Preview

Martha Stewart White Collar Crimes

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
291 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Martha Stewart White Collar Crimes
White collar crimes committed by people with high status, money, or power generally tend to get a lighter sentencing than street crimes. People with power, have the money and the resources to get out of tough situations that can cause lawful consequences.

For example, in December of 2001, Martha Stewart sold over 3,000 shares of Imclone System Stocks to save her $45,000 on her ImClone stocks. She was convicted of conspiracy, false statement, and prejury changes. For this crime she was only sentenced to 10 months imprisonment, had to pay fines and penalties that exceeded $250,000, and was no longer allowed to be President of Martha Stewart Living Omni-media.

No lets take a look at the penalties for committing a street crime such as drug

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Bernard Madoff “Ponzi Scheme” scandal was the biggest and lasted the longest financial fraud in the history of the US. Bernard Madoff was a financial adviser, and also the former chairman of the NADAQ. He established his investment firm named “Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC” in 1960. The Madoff Fraud is a typical “Ponzi Scheme”, in order to attract investors to give money to him, he convinced people to hand over their life saving, and promised them high returns rate, and then he used these money to make payments to those earlier investors. He took the investors for a $65 billion over the course of nearly two decades. In the end, Bernard was sentenced to maximum 150 years prison life and a forfeiture of $170 billion.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    This case analysis offers facts and opinions about Martha Stewart committing insider trading. It will examine how Martha knew about ImClone stock dropping and how she uethically spiraled out control. Severel articles will be used to support how Martha was sentenced and…

    • 2080 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. The situation that I chose for this assignment was, Martha Stewart being arrested for lying about a stock sale. “Stewart, 63, was convicted in March of lying to investigators about why she sold ImClone stock in December 2001, just before the stock price plunged” (NBC News, 2004). Martha is a very intelligent, business woman, but she made a bad decision.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    She eventually spent 5 months in federal prison. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia took a nosedive and her billion dollar empire was soon worth less than $400 million. Oddly, Stewart continued to command media attention and when people saw she wasn't broken, her stock regained most of it losses. The incarcerated Stewart was a billionaire once again.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They believed they were out to get her because she was a celebrity. If it was anyone else, they would either let it go or they would have punished them more. According to other researchers and prosecutors, they believed Martha got lucky. “it has been realized that a celebrity, a wealthy business person, or a political leader can get off more easily and die to their ability to pay the jail-out, they usually od not get the suffering they should feel and deserve in the prison life, instead they pay the find demanded and exchange in small stiff cell bed in jail for a $10,000 cushion at the privacy and safety of their own home while watching their favorite TV show and having an expensive snack” (source). Martha was able to pay her out because she had the money Bututs argued that it is not fair, because poorer people couldn’t afford nearly as much as Ms. Stewart. It makes sense though. As Robert Blakc (Barreta) use to say, “Don’t od the crime, if you can’t do the time.” Everyone, rich or poor, should pay the same amount and jail time should be the…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I do think that the mandatory sentencing is one approach to solving the drug problem, but I do not think that it is the only one. It is clear that the sentencing works to a certain extent, but is not the right choice for every situation. Personally, I feel like this is a gray area due to the fact that mandatory sentencing gives definitive discipline to someone who broke the law. Where in specific cases that approach is too strict. Although I do not have a direct answer to solve this problem, I think that different variables should play into the sentencing.…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not believe that the ends justify the means when it comes to mandatory minimum sentencing for drug offenses. The reason for enacting these laws was to try and deter crime, but research has shown that harsher punishments does not lead to a decrease in crime rates. Incarcerating people for drug offenses is not an effective way to combat drug crimes. The space in prisons, and funds used to fight drug crimes should both be focused more on violent…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reason these laws were designed were to try to put an end to and capture more high level drug lords. The argument that many people are…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I love to cook, so finding and trying out a new recipe for me is great. When I have the time, I love to watch cooking shows on TV, so what comes to mind for me, is the Martha Stewart scandal in 2004. In 2001, Martha Stewart had received an inside tip from her stockbroker that her stock, ImClone Systems was going to fall, so she sold her almost 4,000 shares in the company to avoid an almost $46,000 loss, the next day the stock fell 16%. Over the next few months, Martha's activies were being investigated, she was quesioned and later indicted on nine counts, including securites fraud and obstruction of justice. There was a six week trial in january 2004, in which Martha Stewart was convicted and sencentance to five months in prison. She…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, Mandatory Minimum sentencing should be abolished but the nonviolent drug offenses should still be taken to court. The Mandatory Minimum sentencing has some decent intentions but there needs to be some type of change or beneficial results in order for it to be effective. It weighs more bad rather than good, which justifies that America needs to expunge this system, so as to where America can be an eminent…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Martha Stewart Ethics

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Before one can make an informed decision as to whether Martha Stewart's handled the incident responsibly or whether or not her actions were moral or immoral, one must first understand the basics of ethics and understand whose rights are involved and how they were affected. Then one must also examine who will be helped and who will be hurt by her actions and then make a decision based on the information and personal values as they relate to the issue. Martha Stewart was charged in 2001 with making false statements, conspiracy, and obstruction of justice during her sale of ImClone the day before the FDA announced its refusal to review a new cancer drug. This sale was scrutinized by authorities because it is illegal to have inside information and trade the stock before the bottom drops out.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Race And Crime Essay

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As I wrap up my blog we have seen that crime is not race specific. All races commit crime, furthermore all races participate in gang activity, it is just not reserved for Black and Latinos. All of the examples used in the previous blogs are not exclusive to certain races. What makes the difference is how society views who is a criminal and who commits crimes. Added to this, is the disproportion of how crime is handled. With the exception of heinous and violent crimes, many people who commit crimes will most likely get away with it. How the criminal justice system handles cases can affect who goes to prison and who doesn’t. Furthermore criminals that are more culpable may get away with lighter sentences, than those that are only accessories to the crime, simply because of their race, or because they can afford better attorneys.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between white collar crime and corporate crime are very slight. White collar crime is usually conducted by people and corporate crimes are conducted by an organization. White collar crime is usually conducted by higher classed individuals such as CEO's or high level employee's of an organization. The individuals utilize the organization in order to exploit the company's investors or employee's. A corporate crime utilizes the organization to break the laws. The individuals who conduct white collar crimes usually work for high end organizations with access to investor funds. Corporate crimes can be committed by any corporation. The main difference between white collar crime and corporate crime would be that white collar crime is conducted by individuals who work for a company and corporate crime is conducted by the corporation in a whole.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very famous scandal that has embedded ourselves in our history is the Martha Stewart scandal of 2003. Martha Stewart is a true success story of the American dream in effect. Starting as a housewife, Martha created her career by turning her previous business experience and career into a household name and an enterprise. Having established Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (MSO), which handled everything from print to television to merchandising, with her business partner Sharon Patrick in 1997 the company went public in October of 1999. She became entangled in an insider trading scandal only 4 years later.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tyco. WorldCom. These companies created an environment of public mistrust of big corporations. Lives were destroyed; life savings depleted, and at the end, seemingly light punishments, if any were given to responsible parties. There was no tolerance for continued corporate impropriety. Martha Stewart sold almost 4000 (exactly 3,928) shares of her personally owned stock of ImClone in December 2001. The perception of wrong-doing came about as it related to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) disapproval of an ImClone drug. A friend of Stewart, and ImClone executive, indicated to her that the FDA would not approve the drug. Martha Stewart subsequently sold her shares of the depreciating stock, avoiding a sizeable loss. Stewart maintained that there was a pre-existing agreement with her portfolio manager to sell the stock when its value fell to $60 dollars a share, and that the FDA decision and her actions were…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics