Preview

Mark Antony: Unscrupulous Denotation

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
265 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mark Antony: Unscrupulous Denotation
Clara Chu
Ms.Courey
English10 Honors, Period 7
10 February 2015
Title
Unscrupulous denotation is having or showing no moral principles; not honest or fair. While Machiavellian denotation is cunning, scheming. Mark Antony is both a unscrupulous person and Machiavellian. He is manipulative by using rhetoric devices to manipulate people, and Antony is also liar because he talks behind his allies back or he tricks his enemies, and finally he is not a faithful to his country when he causes chaos and harms the citizens.
One of the reason Mark Antony is unscrupulous is because he is deceitful and backstabbing. For instance when Antony is talking with Octavius he verbally abuses Lepidus, an ally “The threefold world divided, he should stand/ One

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the assassination of Caesar, Brutus explains his reasons for committing such an act. Antony deceives Brutus into believing that Antony understood their reasons and would join them as an ally. By becoming a supposed ally, Antony gains the advantage of trust, as Brutus trusts him to speak at Caesar’s funeral. At Caesar’s funeral, Antony goes against Brutus’ trust, and reveals Caesar’s will, and incites the plebeians to come to the conclusion that Caesar had been a good man, and that Brutus was in the wrong. Antony reveals his true intentions when he says to himself, “Mischief thou art afoot; / Take thou what course thou wilt” (III. iii. 275-276). Antony had taken advantage of the trust bestowed upon him by pulling off a brilliant act on his part, that effectively persuaded Brutus. Not only that, Antony also takes advantage of the trust that the plebeians had given him. His ulterior motives are revealed when he criticizes Lepidus’ ability to stand besides them and asks, “Is it fit, / The threefold world divided, he should stand / One of the three to share it?” (IV. i. 15-17). This shows how Antony has no intention of fulfilling his promise made to the plebeians to uphold Caesar’s will. Instead, he wants to gain power for himself, and gets rid of Brutus and the other conspirators to get his way. He had acted as a perfect friend/ally to the plebeians as he acted to Brutus, and he also took advantage of them as well.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word “honorable” is an uplifting term used to describe a person with great honor and ethics, but Antony says he “should do Brutus wrong, and Cassius wrong/ Who, you all know, are honourable men”(3.2.135-136). By the time Antony says this, he had already used the word “honorable” to describe Brutus and the conspirators five times, which indicates repetition. By using rhetorical devices such as repetition, Antony can get his point across, which is that the conspirators might not have actually done a very honorable thing.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He even went against Octavian, which was Julius’s nephew. When he went up against Octavian, and he lost that battle. Antony is the least honorable character. For example, Antony caused a war by causing a riot. Antony isn’t ignorant, but his actions make him look like he’s ignorant.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He illuminated their worries and played into to their weak minds. His gift of rhetorics is able to seduce every man in the city into killing the conspirators; and they do kill the conspirators. Antony states that they are all honorable Romans, and the Romans think Antony respects them. In reality he wants the conspirators dead, and uses the Romans to do so. As a leader in our society today Antony would be able to get rid of the untrustworthy leaders and keep order, law, and loyalty in our government. He would also be able to invoke a healthy sense of fear into the hearts on our citizens, fear that is not currently present.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marc Antony was Caesar’s right hand man and best friend. He was a noble person until Caesar was murdered and he became part of the new triumvirate. Having this power made him crave more and he began using public money to fund his army and to become more powerful. He used Lepidus to do his small jobs along with bullying Octavius into doing what he wanted. All this because he was power hungry.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony’s use of repetition showcases brilliant sarcasm. He utilizes the word “honorable” to describe Brutus and Cassius, two of Caesar’s assassins, on nine different occasions: “for Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2. 82), “so are they all, all honorable men” (3.2. 83), “and Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2. 87), “and Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2. 94), “who, you all know, are honorable men” (3.2. 124), “I will wrong such honorable men” (3.2. 127), “I fear I wrong the honorable men” (3.2.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mark Antony Research Paper

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Life in Ancient Egypt was one of cycles, dictated by the Nile. The time to plant, the time to harvest, even the time to build, were dictated by its flowing waters. The Nile ruled Egypt for over two thousand years. However in 31 B.C., a new force came to rule Egypt, as it had never been ruled before. The Assyrians, Hyksos, Persians, had all conquered the people of the Nile. Yet later, all had been expelled by the Egyptians. Even the mighty Greeks had been assimilated into the Ptolemies, ruling Egypt as Pharaohs, not as Greeks. However the legions of Rome could not be expelled, nor assimilated. They brought with them little respect for the existing culture, religion, and rulers. They began sweeping yet effective change for the Egyptian people…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mark Antony speech, uses the repetition to appeals the emotions by repeat two words “ambitious” and “honorable,” the words take on the opposite of what it means.“Brutus is an honorable man.”Brutus is not an honorable man, Mark Antony use the sarcastic tone to emphasizing…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus is continuously making bad decisions, the biggest of which is letting Mark Antony live; "...For Mark Antony, think not of him; for he can do no more than Caesar's arm when…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony betrayed Brutus and Cassius by saying he was on their side then turned Rome against them mainly because Caesar’s death. “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears. I come to bury Caesar, not praise him, the evil that men are evil”. Antony is telling Rome that the killing of Caesar was wrong and the people were wrong for doing it. Antony stands up for Caesar to protect his honor and to prove to the city of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The rhetorical device Antony took hold of throughout his persuasive argument is verbal irony. The use of verbal irony in his speech is so strong that it borders on sarcasm. "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears/I come to bury Ceasar, not to praise him." (3.2.81-82) says Antony when introducing himself to the crowd. The use of verbal irony is exemplified in this quote with the use of “Friend” He addresses the plebeians as "Friends" with the purpose of persuading them into believing that they were equal, and that he just wanted to say farewell Caesar, even though there is a clear distinction between Antony and the Plebeians. As his speech develops, Antony begins to plant the seed of doubt and anger in the Plebeians’ hearts towards the conspirators. "The noble Brutus/ hath told you Caesar was ambitious,/If it were so, it was a grievous fault, /And grievously hath Caesar answered it,/ Here, under the leave of Brutus and the rest-/ For Brutus is an honorable man,/ So are they all are honorable men" (2.3.84-91) Antony starts off his speech agreeing to not demize the conspirators. However, it is clear to the reader that Antony does everything in his power to show they were not honorable men without saying they were dishonest.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony, one of the main characters of Shakespeare's play, Julius Caesar, is made out to be one of the “good guys” all throughout the play, but as seen later after Caesar’s death, he actually had bad intentions from the start. It was not known that Mark Antony had bad intentions, until he was alone in the play. When he was alone, he showed who he really was, proving the quote true. In a play, the best way to find out a character's true identity is through a soliloquy: “Fierce civil war will paralyze all of…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus was a devious man, even though what he thought he was doing was right. Brutus told his fellow conspirators to kill Caesar "boldly, but not angerly."(3.1.256-257) Brutus was one of Caesars right hand men, and yet Brutus kills his own friend. When Antony asks to speak at Caesars funeral, Cassius says no, but Brutus tell him that Antony will speak, but only what Brutus tells him to say. Brutus also embraces the fact that he just killed his friend, and also tells the senators who had just witnessed it to not be afraid, but to stay because ambition has paid its debt.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He defends the noble Brutus. " Brutus is an honorable man"(300), so if he tells of Caesar being ambitious then you all should believe him. He expresses to everyone the reasons and times, "as he was ambitious"(300). Everything had a reason and truth behind it and for this is why they believed Antony. For, " Antony himself was an honorable…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays