Mariano Azuela Analysis
AZUELA
• Mariana Azuela, medical Dr aswell as an author … YOU MUST TALKE ABOUT HIM
• He was chief of fiscal affairs in his home town, so a middle class person, a medical DR, a local politician … is this linking us into a certain type of revolutionary? If you wanted to call him one, which type would he have been, diaz? Madero? … he was an intellectual revolutionary, certainly a modero stance … I would think so, why would he not be nesicailary villa, he was a scruffy bandit, later on he becomes more respectiable but I tend to agree with you that he was following modero … he just wanted to reform … so shannas saying as a maoesta he would be a reformoist more than social revultionary and if we wanted to help you out we would back up that MADONISTAS WERE REFORMERS RATHER THAN ANYTHING ELSE, PS, …show more content…
who come sout worst, who does he treat most badly, which character or group is he most harsh? Some of the men following Demitire, blonide because of his violence, his ruthlessness there and in actualy fact could tag closely pancho villas dorados, someone who was just mental, would kill people ruthlessly. Who else, or which group? The federals, we only get it decriped through demitiri, but to a ceftain extent you get that, they were alwys the enemy … any group within the revolution? this is what mexico is like, cervantes, his life … they had the odeology, they had the drive and revolutionary direction and then they dithced the revoltuiona dn elft it high and dry, abandoned the revoltuion, he should hav eben giving direction, at a time were he should, he leave for america and encourages people to come, what happened the ideals they once had? The ciritiism of the revolutionw as that the middlecalss bourgeouis failed the revoltuioon and didn't give it direction, from 1914-17 it was almost directionless and that when people in the revolution got killed, at this time the stone was rolling down the hill and your cant challenge
• Mariana Azuela, medical Dr aswell as an author … YOU MUST TALKE ABOUT HIM
• He was chief of fiscal affairs in his home town, so a middle class person, a medical DR, a local politician … is this linking us into a certain type of revolutionary? If you wanted to call him one, which type would he have been, diaz? Madero? … he was an intellectual revolutionary, certainly a modero stance … I would think so, why would he not be nesicailary villa, he was a scruffy bandit, later on he becomes more respectiable but I tend to agree with you that he was following modero … he just wanted to reform … so shannas saying as a maoesta he would be a reformoist more than social revultionary and if we wanted to help you out we would back up that MADONISTAS WERE REFORMERS RATHER THAN ANYTHING ELSE, PS, …show more content…
who come sout worst, who does he treat most badly, which character or group is he most harsh? Some of the men following Demitire, blonide because of his violence, his ruthlessness there and in actualy fact could tag closely pancho villas dorados, someone who was just mental, would kill people ruthlessly. Who else, or which group? The federals, we only get it decriped through demitiri, but to a ceftain extent you get that, they were alwys the enemy … any group within the revolution? this is what mexico is like, cervantes, his life … they had the odeology, they had the drive and revolutionary direction and then they dithced the revoltuiona dn elft it high and dry, abandoned the revoltuion, he should hav eben giving direction, at a time were he should, he leave for america and encourages people to come, what happened the ideals they once had? The ciritiism of the revolutionw as that the middlecalss bourgeouis failed the revoltuioon and didn't give it direction, from 1914-17 it was almost directionless and that when people in the revolution got killed, at this time the stone was rolling down the hill and your cant challenge