Preview

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
457 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Essay
Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Many people are victims of a crime, or they’re the ones committing the crime. Some of these crimes that have been committed are sentenced as Mandatory Minimum Sentencing. Mandatory Minimum sentencing is when a person convicts a crime, and must be in prison for a minimum term, the days of punishment is up to the judges to decide. In this occasion the kind of crime that they commit depends on the amount of time the assailant will serve. What does the world have to offer of this law.
The history of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing (penalties) according to the web, in the early 18th century, congress has used Mandatory minimum penalties since it first present the first federal penal (a code of laws concerning crimes and offenses and their punishments). Mandatory minimum penalties has always been important for serious offensive, for instance murder or treason, it's also important to address immediate problems and exigencias. The Constitution permitted Congress to established criminal offenses and established the punishments for those offenses. First comprehensive, created by congress, of federal offenses with the passage of the 1790 Crimes Act, which it
…show more content…
Increasing up to 10th, the number of offenses that qualified mandatory minimum penalty, which involves piracy offenses specified four different forms of criminal conduct. Treason, murder and piracy remain punishable by a mandatory penalty today ( 2017 ). Left with 13 of the crimes were punished by the meaning of been in prison with a maximum of up to one year (three offenses ), three years (seven offenses ), or seven years (three offenses ). The remaining three crimes were punishable by fines and corporal punishment or left to the court’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Think about that.” Mandatory minimums are an outdated, destructive policy that the U.S. never has, and never will need. In order to reform our criminal justice system, and ensure that the people who go to prison are there for a time that’s proportional to the crime they commit, we must get rid of mandatory minimums. Aside from the harm they cause to the prisoner, law-abiding American taxpayers are burdened by the unnecessary cost of keeping people in prisons for much longer than is needed. Of course, mandatory minimums are far from the only problem within the U.S. criminal justice system, however, abolishing these ridiculous laws will help thousands of current American prisoners, as well as innumerable future offenders. Overall, mandatory minimum sentencing policy must be ended in the near future, should America hold true to its values of “freedom and justice for…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Another contrast between cigarettes and cannabis, is that cannabis has medicinal properties. The most common use for marijuana in medicine is to diminish the effects of chemotherapy on cancer patients. The two most familiar components of marijuana to the medical industry is tetrahydrocannabinol or THC and cannabidiol or CBD. Both THC and CBD are noted in the US Patent # 6630507 as having antioxidant properties and being useful in treatment of side effects “caused by oxidative stress” such as chemotherapy (Hampson). Chemotherapy is the method of treating cancer in which you kill or stunt the growth of cells, in order to eliminate the cancerous ones. The possible side effects include headaches, pain from nerve damage, nausea, and vomiting. THC…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “mandatory minimum sentencing means a person convicted of a crime must be imprisoned for a…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentences are another method that was designed to limit judicial discretion while maintaining a “get tough on crime” approach. Mandatory sentences are sentences where all people convicted of certain crimes will be punished equally with a set minimum prison term. I believe the intentions were good when these reforms went into place. I think the intended purpose was to get tough on crime, eliminate bias on the part of the judge, to make criminals think twice about breaking the law, and provide equal punishment to all criminals who commit the same crimes. Unfortunately these sentence guidelines do not allow a judge to take into consideration the first time offender, differentiate the deviance level of the offender, and it does not allow for the judge to tailor a punishment to each individual case. The “drug war” they were trying to control with these sentences has had a backfire effect. The drug lords they were trying to stop are not the ones being affected by the sentences; it is the nonviolent, low-level drug users who are overcrowding the prisons as a result of these sentences.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Those in support of MMS state that they keep the justice system fair and safe from radical judges and juries who’s views on sentencing will vary greatly for each individual; therefore, actually preventing disparities. MMS are a powerful deterrent that prosecutors can use against the accused to get plea bargains and information on those higher in the drug organizations; however, those opposed say that MMS cases have no advantage when it comes to cooperation rates because most who are arrested are low level offenders who are not affiliated or know little about the organization (Mandatory Minimum sentencing 1). This means it is usually those who are higher up the chain- those who are doing the more serious crimes- that end up getting their sentences cut…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following paragraphs will define and explain the differences between determinate and indeterminate sentences. This discussion may seem, at first blush, to be somewhat theoretical. However, the issue is a life-altering one for parole as an institution. In a determinate sentencing structure, there is no role for a paroling authority in making release decisions.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mandatory minimums are laws which require automatic prison terms for certain crimes, such as drug possession. These laws were passed to ensure that individual criminals served long prison sentences. However, there some critics that have voiced their concerns about mandatory minimum penalties in the United States.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges have lost the ability to tailor the sentence to fit the circumstances of each individual case. One size does not fit all. The Guidelines are one cause of the dramatic growth in the federal justice system. A system intended to streamline and simplify the sentencing process has instead created a far more complex system that has clogged the courts with appeals over Guidelines' applications. Furthermore, the federal Guidelines are not simply guidelines, as the name suggests: they are mandatory. Judges are required to follow them, no matter how inappropriate the result (Anderson,…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This book explains the law and surrounding debate on mandatory minimum sentences, the fulfillment of the objectives, cost and consequences, and the details of the static analysis. It additionally reviews the differences in drug quantities (level of violation) and the sentences applied.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today 's sentencing includes imprisonment, fines, probation, and for serious offenses death. (Schamallenger, 2011). Sentencing has not…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Earlier responses to crime were to be brutal, which included torture, humiliation, mutilation, and branding. These kinds of punishments often attempted to relate the punishment to the crime, as close as possible. The first response to crime incorporated linking criminal acts to sin and developing strict punishments. Throughout the years, this thought process has changed into a more humane system. The reason for corrections to is to protect the society but also to provide rehabilitation to these individuals. Punishments for criminals now include main objectives that widely differ from the first believed aspects of punishments. Punishments now embrace objectives pertaining to deterrence, incarceration, rehabilitation, retribution and restitution.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sentencing Proposal

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The last stage of a criminal trial is known as sentencing. During sentencing the convening authority over the criminal court proceedings makes a determination of how the guilty party should be punished. Prior to that determination being made both the defense attorneys and prosecutors may make their arguments as to why or why not the defendant should be punished to the fullest of the law. The judge taking these arguments into consideration makes his or her decision on what type sentence to hand down. While the main goal is to punish those that are found guilty there are five sentencing rationales in use in the American criminal justice system. These rationales are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, restoration, and incapacitation. In the case of State v. Stu Dents, the judge will use the rationales of rehabilitation and incapacitation. The defense and prosecutors will make their arguments and propose the type of sentence Mr. Dents should receive which in turn will protect him and society.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Minimum mandatory penalties have been used since the enactment of the first federal penal laws in the 18th Century. The United States Constitution granted Congress the power to set the punishments for serious offenses, such as…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Philosophies

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page

    The factors that go into determining sentencing are broke into three steps. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. A factor that can change incarceration time is that of “good time”, this is when a reduction in time served by a prisoner is based on good behavior and other positive actions. This is said to promote discipline…

    • 353 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays