Preview

Machiavelli's 'The Prince'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli's 'The Prince'
Tough Love

“If you have to make a choice, to be feared is much safer than to be loved” (46). Niccolò Machiavelli declared this in The Prince while explaining how to be an extraordinary leader. If leaders are feared they will be respected by their people and other countries, thus keeping justice and maintaining control. If a leader is feared, they will receive respect from their people and other countries. People will not turn against the leader, but if the people love him they would willingly take advantage of him. Likewise, if a country is in fear of a certain leader or country they would never think of turning against or taking advantage of them. As Niccolò Machiavelli stated in The Prince, “People are less concerned with offending a man who makes himself loved than one who makes himself feared; the reason Is that love is a link of obligation which men, because they are rotten, will break any time they think doing so serves their advantage; but fear involves dread of punishment, form which they can never escape” (46).
…show more content…
Machiavelli declared, “…Hannibal… having an immense army, which included men of many different races and nations, and which he led to battle in distant countries, he never allowed them to fight among themselves or to rise against him, whether his fortune was good or bad. The reason for this could only be his inhuman cruelty, which, along with his countless other talents… without the cruelty, his other qualities would never have sufficed” (46-47). This leader used forms of cruelty to instill a feeling of fear in his people. His people lived in apprehension of all injustice to avoid penalty many times defined as death. People will be less likely to act out against or try to over throw their leader if they are afraid of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince examines how to acquire and maintain power of a nation. Machiavelli states that nations are either republics or principalities. The four types of principalities are hereditary, new, mixed and ecclesiastical. Hereditary principalities occur when the prince inherits the nation from his ancestors. Hereditary states experience fewer difficulties compared to newer states because they are accustomed to the family of the prince. New Principalities are acquired either by the power of others, one’s own power, luck, or ability. New Principalities are either accustomed to the rule of a prince or was a free state. When a prince conquers a free state it threatens the people’s lifestyle and customs. Therefore, the people…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A good leader is one who can stand up against the norm and take risks to uphold their state. According to Machiavelli, in his book The Prince, this includes taking actions that are not favored by the majority. Though Machiavelli was born on May 3rd, 1469 and only wrote his book in 1513, his ideas were so significant that they apply even to contemporary leaders. Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, is facing situations that can either prove her strength as a leader or set the European Union on a road to destruction. On top of dealing with the major Greek debt crisis, she has been faced with the task of deciding how to handle the Syrian refugees. Using the examples and analysis provided by Machiavelli, Merkel’s best plan would be to pressure…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a significant analysis of Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince. This book explores multiple concepts on leadership and governance for a Prince to legislate on his road to success. Therefore, I will bring a compelling conclusion on how Russian President Vladimir Putin is a modern Machiavelli. To get a full understanding towards Niccolo Machiavelli’s political theory, we must first examine what’s managed to inspire his view of an ideal government. In the book, The Prince, Machiavelli introduces insightful claims on how the Roman Empire’s legitimacy brought a secure and stable society. In fact, presenting the Roman Empire’s platform helped the reader to thoroughly understand Machiavelli’s political theory regarding governance and the…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to gain control over his people he uses fear. ”[M]en are less hesitant about harming someone who makes himself loved then who makes himself feared….” (44) Since man is so hesitant to betray someone who they fear, the prince remains in control of his people. The terror of punishment keeps the people in order, which enables a smooth running government. According to Machiavelli this fear is the only way for a prince to govern his people and avoid harm. Lao-Tzu’s thoughts are completely different from Machiavelli’s. Tzu believes in a smaller government, where the people actual govern themselves. He believes that the people should feel equal to the ruler and that the ruler must place himself below the people. Tzu stresses self control throughout the reading. Unlike Machiavelli he believes it is better to be loved than feared and he states that “if you want to lead the people, / you must learn how to follow them” (Section…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hongwu apply Machiavelli’s teaching by making people to fear him.From the class handout, it said ”Men will quickly offend a beloved person; but fear creates a dread of punishment which never fail.” this quote explained that people can easily betray a beloved leader but not a fearful leader.It also showed us that a king should make people to fear, scared about…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu vs Machiavelli

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When utilizing the rhetorical strategy of comparing and contrasting in relationship to literature, a number of pieces of can qualify. In particular, the idea of leadership is arguably one of the most written about topics with regard to comparing and contrasting. Throughout history, it can be argued that the majority of successful societies have been based upon effective divisions of leadership. Accordingly, in their pieces of literature, The Tao-te Ching and The Qualities of the Prince, Lao-tzu and Machiavelli have sought to convey a more complete and concrete understanding of their respective definitions and duties of a ruler (leadership). The theme of political leaders and their intricate relationship with society indeed validate itself within both texts. However, both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli approach this issue from almost entirely opposite positions, though sharing minute similarities. Lao-tzu appears to focus the majority of his attention on letting problems or situations take their course, and consequently good would prevail. On the contrary, Machiavelli advocates the necessity for a successful leader, or prince, to take control of his deeds, and the skills or qualities necessary to maintain power. Since both writers propose a question as to what is in essence the same dilemma, effective leadership, it becomes almost natural literary etiquette to contrast the two in an effort to better understand what qualities a prosperous leader must possess. Despite each author’s contrasting approaches to rhetoric, they agree that a ruler should avoid being hated and despised, but disagree in areas such as government involvement in citizens’ everyday lives.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Bonaparte is a well known political leader of the modern world. His conquests into other European countries and his military knowledge make him the historical legend that he has come to be. He made himself emperor of France and ended the French Revolution. Bonaparte’s successes in France cause him to be revered as a great leader who exemplifies Niccolò Machiavelli’s beliefs regarding the leadership of a country. Machiavelli offers advice to political leaders in his novel, The Prince, which is proven relevant through Napoleon’s ability to be war-minded, feared, and a good leader.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Prince was written in the 1500’s by Niccolo Machiavelli, whom name became a synonym for crafty plotting. As noted, it is a political and social document, as relevant today as when it first appeared. Machiavelli’s work became thought of as a blueprint for dictators instead of a guide for efficient democratic government. The Prince does not give us all of Machiavelli’s political thinking; however, he devised this reading for the man who seeks power. It treated the most severe problem of Italy, its inferiority in political organization and military strength to nearby states like Spain and France and was addressed to princes like the Lorenzo “The Magnificent” Medici, to whom it was dedicated. As difficult as it was to read, I did not find…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli intended The Prince to serve as a guide to creating and holding on to a principality. In it, he also characterizes a "good" society and the necessary tools for building one. Although Machiavelli conceives the republic as being the most practical form of government, he reasons that it is still possible to create a good society under a monarchy, as long as the leader of the monarchy follows the stipulated guidelines. Machiavelli realized that humans are predisposed to act perniciously and therefore it is the responsibility of the prince to exploit that nature in a way that will benefit society as a whole. In this way, Machiavelli's prince is an ideal crafted from the actual, rather than an actual crafted from the ideal.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The world is unsettled. There seems to be continuous conflict at every turn. The feeling of being unsettled creates fear. The greatest levels of fear in the short-run come when one does not feel assured of one’s safety and one’s family's safety. The fear of the unknown is the most tangible fear for the long-term, that is, the feeling of terror of what lies ahead. Everyone wants freedom from fear, particularly the fear of the unknown and the feeling of one’s lack of safety. Unfortunately, with a continuous flow of unrest and unsettling around the world, we continue to feel fear. Our leaders do what they can to minimize this unsettled feeling.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From George Washington to Mao Zedong leaders throughout history have made their mark. Leaders are either loved and or feared neither necessarily go with good or bad leaders. Leaders have been loved throughout history, but a few in the crowed think differently, regardless of whether the leader fixed world hunger or cured cancer there will always be a few that still despise that leader. Imagine the most feared leader, everyone will be scared. Weather a great or terrible leader, it doesn’t matter how loveable a leader can be, some will hate them but if a leader is truly feared then everyone will fear them. Not everyone will love the most lovable leader but everyone will fear the most fearful leader.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Hope Bryant, an American entrepreneur, stated “leadership is love in operation.” A government official cannot be considered a leader if they aren’t readily willing to defend their nation. Because citizens aren’t inclined to rebel, the workforce doesn’t suffer from a negative environment, and a positive country inspires rather than discourages, a society is more effective when its population loves its leader .…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli, the well-known philosopher of the Italian Renaissance, poses this question in this famous book excerpt The Morals of the Prince: "is it better to be loved than feared, or vice versa?" Machiavelli answers his own question, arguing that a prince is much safer being feared than being loved. Inducing fear upon his subjects with cruelty will keep them united and loyal. Those who are fearful of a person of any authority are more inclined not to cross the boundary of disrespect, for fear of punishment. Without a doubt, being loved is desired and has a greater value compared to being feared. Love has the power to nurture, support and ultimately, liberate; fear restricts, denies and imprisons. Personal growth and human achievement thrive on love, while fear hampers and destroys potential.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays