Preview

Machiavelli Vs Rousseau Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli Vs Rousseau Research Paper
MACHIAVELLI VS. ROUSSEAU

Machiavelli and Rousseau were two great minds of European history. They both developed ideas on how to run a country. The two shared some of their views even though they were centuries apart, however, some ideas were very contradictory. Machiavelli believed in a very strict form of government. His time, 15th century Italy, was a time of princes and control over everything. People fought wars just to gain another city and blood and guts was a common occurrence. Machiavelli knew that a prince must be strong to gain his power, and must be strong to keep it. He thought it right to do anything it took to get this power, whether it was moral or not. Perception was everything to Machiavelli. Even though a prince

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli Paper

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If I were a prince during the time of Machiavelli, then his methods would be very useful because power was constantly being moved. If I wanted my power to last then I would want to be cunning and feared. His methods of being devious and deceiving are perfect for winning battles and maintaining a city.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a Prince should break his promises to man because man is evil and will break his promises to the Prince. I believe this theory to be true. If one desires to be a successful Prince, one must be able to understand and accept that evil characteristics are in all men. I also believe in order to be successful, it is necessary to take into account the fact that one may have to arouse fear in ones people in order to preserve and keep them well off. At times it may be necessary that those who hold power are the ones who are most inhumane; if this is held with low regard, one may bring collapse to their people, and unto oneself. However, as someone in power, one cannot be so merciless as to alienate ones people. There is a balance that must be kept. There may be certain situations where one feels a compelling need to lie and be deceitful; however, as a general rule, to maintain credibility one be trustworthy and loyal whenever possible. As a Prince, one must come off as moral and self-sacrificing but know at times that might not be the case. Machiavelli knows that for a Prince to be successful, his people have to be loyal and respectful. If one gains the respect of his people, both aspects will be successful and benefit…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, known as the founding father of modern Political Science, lived between 1469 and 1752 in Florence in what is known today as Italy. He is not only known for his work in politics and diplomacy, as he was also a well-versed historian. He employed the method of citing historic figures and events in his justification for the suggestions he made in his famous book: The Prince. In the book that was dedicated to Lorenzo Medici, Machiavelli raises many important aspects relating to the political environment, governance and ethics of an individual in possession of political power citing political actions that should and should not be taken, the state briefly and violence in governing which is studied by political philosophers today as there are many ancient concepts…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To give his advice structure, Machiavelli used an abundance of historical references. One leader he refers to is Francesco Sforza, Duke of Milan. Sforza fought and won power as a Duke, he passed that power on to his sons. His sons avoided war and lost power. This a great story to persuade the reader to think that the advice Machiavelli is giving should be taken. His message is that if a prince is not willing to fight, as Sforza's sons were not, they too may lose power. Machiavelli stresses the point that it is better to be feared than loved. A perfect comparison of the two sides is Hannibal and Scipio. Machiavelli…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The idea of self-preservation is presented at two different extremes in the Machiavelli's The Prince and Rousseau's The Origin of Civil Society. Machiavelli presents self-preservation as something you consciously do for your own needs and the needs of society. Rousseau presents the idea of self-preservation as an action that began as instinctive and evolved into a conscious…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that everyone should be ready for any attack or for him or her to be able to defend his country. Machiavelli says “… in peacetime he must train himself more than in time of war” (3). What he is saying that the peacetime that is given, they are to be training the most. He believes that a leader should have his soldiers ready for action. He would train with them daily. He set up multiple training stations to know their way in and how to escape difficult traps. Machiavelli as a leader would have them well trained because he knows at any moment any one would attack him. He rather is feared than loved, so that would only make many people hate him. He would act like he showed interest in his people but only did that so people would be on his side during times of…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It has been the general outlook among political philosophers that there is a particular association between moral goodness and legitimate authority. Many authors believed that the use of political power was only correct if it was employed by a ruler whose personal moral character was strictly virtuous. Therefore, rulers were advised that if they wanted to be a successful ruler, they must behave according to the conventional standards of ethical goodness. It was thought that rulers did good when they did well; they earned the privilege to be obeyed and respected when they showed themselves to be virtuous and morally decent.…

    • 2927 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli’s The Prince is teaching the politically ambitious rulers how to use violence in order to secure the power as a personal end. Machiavelli advises a ruler to use violence as part of politics in order to maintain the rule but most importantly he should use violence to aim at political stability and the overall benefit of the community. In this regard, Machiavelli opposes the illicit use of political violence because he believes that ultimately that will be destructive to the user. Machiavelli’s view on political violence does seem to be strict however it distinguishes the practical and moral use of violence. The two historical figure whom Machiavelli uses models in order to explain his theories are Cesare Borgia and Agathocles. These…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau (28 June 1712 – 2 July 1778) was a Genevan philosopher, writer, and composer of 18th-century Romanticism of French expression. His political philosophy influenced the French Revolution as well as the overall development of modern political, sociological and educational thought. Rousseau was a successful composer of music. He wrote seven operas as well as music in other forms, and he made contributions to music as a theorist. During the period of the French Revolution, Rousseau was the most popular of the philosophes among members of the Jacobin Club. Rousseau, a Freemason,[3] was interred as a national hero in the Panthéon in Paris, in 1794, 16 years after his death.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lead with Example

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stability in a ruler’s morals and ethics are a vital asset to have when ruling a group of people. With similarities shared between the ruler and the common person the ruler will then be able to relate and be more respected amongst the population, as opposed to a ruler who rules with his own self interest at hand. In the piece, The Prince, Niccolò Machiavelli argues the many principles of how a prince should and should not rule. In order to rule successfully he states a prince must possess some of the following characteristics; morality, a strong army, strict rule, common ground with his people and also to be widely respected. Machiavelli laid the ground work for many rulers in the future with his modern view in a time where rulers were primitive and ruled through fear and terror. The Prince and its ideas can even be seen today in our modern day presidents and kings proving that Machiavelli had compelling ideas and arguments for how leaders can obtain and hold a position of power successfully.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the key principles of the foundation of Machiavelli’s teachings is that the realm of politics needs to be in its own scene, its own arena. Throughout his teachings, Machiavelli does his best to separate political ideology and religion. He also comes to the understanding that politics is not ruled from above, but that the ultimate power of politics comes from men. In Machiavelli’s time, people were becoming entrenched with moral goodness while leaving behind ambition. Essentially, Machiavelli’s The Prince cries out for a separation of church and state. It is upon this foundation that Machiavelli establishes his arguments.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli describes the relationship between the ordinary citizens and the nobles, which are the upper classes from aristocratic families. The nobles want to oppress the people, and the people want only to avoid oppression. As a result, of the opposition between the two groups results in the establishment of anarchy. The prince comes to power through the favor of his fellow citizens and it is important that a prince created by the people must retain the people’s loyalty. On the other hand, if the prince is created by the nobles must still win the people’s affection because they will always serve as protection.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prince Book Report

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is said Machiavelli’s thoughts were unusual and cruel. Machiavelli stated in The Prince that to rule a country well you have to be “ruthless” and have an “evil” mentally as a leader to proficiently run a country. Machiavelli’s perspective remains important and relevant for many reasons. One reason is, “Human nature has not changed. Hence, his insights about politics are still valid.” and another reason is, “Business is an important part of our modern life and businesses are essentially autocratic institutions that operate much like the Renaissance principalities that he wrote about in The Prince” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli’s perspective is…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He also was a political philosopher. Machiavelli’s thoughts was a handbook for politicians and still is for many today. He tried to persuade people to try to get the state to be unified, orderly, and balanced and to get people to be happy, honorable, secure, and strong; he believed that rulers should do whatever they need to enforce order. In total, Machiavelli was a political and military theorist, a diplomat, a military planner, a playwright, and a world renowned author. Some of his books include Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livius, The Art of War, Mandragola, History of Florence, and The…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli claims to posses the knowledge of ruling, and ruling well. He claims that the key is to look at prince hood from the eyes of the people and consider their plights rather than his own. It is to be generous and just while also keeping order and safety within all classes of people being governed. This is helpful to Lorenzo De Medici, as he is a prince that does not see the people, only himself and as Machiavelli puts it “...to know the nature of princes well one must be of the people” (Machiavelli, Dedicatory letter). So, in essence, Machiavelli is saying to be a well- liked prince, one must consider the point of view of the people to truly understand the nature with which he himself rules.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays