Preview

Machiavelli Lao-Tzu

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
755 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli Lao-Tzu
Lao-tzu and Machiavelli are political philosophers writing in two different lands and two different times. Lao-tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher from 6th century BC, the author of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived 2000 years after Lao-tzu's time, author of Prince. They are both philosophers but have totally different perspective on how to be a good leader. While both philosopher's writing is instructive. Lao-tzu's advice issues from detached view of a universal ruler; Machiavelli's advice is very personal perhaps demanding. Both philosophers' idea will not work for today's world, because that modern world is not as perfect as Lao-tzu described in Tao-te Ching, and not as chaotic as Machiavelli illustrated in Prince.

Perhaps Lao-tzu and Machivelli's political system will not work for today's world, but some of their philosophies are still exist in some of modern issues. One of those issues is gun control, which has become a dividing line in America. Lao-tzu advised in Tao-te Ching "weapon are the tools of violence; all decent man detest them. Weapon are the tools of fear; a decent man will avoid them except in the direst necessity and, if compelled, will use them only with the utmost restraint." On the other hand Machiavelli wrote in Prince, "Francesco Sforza became Duke of Milan from being a private citizen because he was armed; his sons, since they avoided the inconveniences of arms, became private citizens after having been duke. For, among the other bad effects it causes, being disarmed makes you despised; this is one of those infamies a prince should guard himself against" (page 36) in which he pointed out that taking arms from a people can make a difference between a prince and a citizen. To gun control activists, the issue is about crime and the regulation of the weapons used to commit crimes. In their opinion, law-abiding citizens should have no need for guns, which is similar to Lao-tzu's idea.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Lao-tzu and Machiavelli are political philosophers writing in two different lands and two different times. Lao-tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher from 6th century BC, the author of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived 2000 years after Lao-tzu's time, author of Prince. They are both philosophers but have totally different perspective on how to be a good leader. While both philosopher's writing is instructive. Lao-tzu's advice issues from detached view of a universal ruler; Machiavelli's advice is very personal perhaps demanding. Both philosophers' idea will not work for today's world, because that modern world is not as perfect as Lao-tzu described in Tao-te Ching, and not as chaotic as Machiavelli illustrated in Prince.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the fourth paragraph, under the subtitle The Prince, Vincent Barnett states that Machiavelli refers to all men as “ungrateful, fickle, liars, and deceivers.” He also states that men were not loyal, but greedy and self absorbed. Machiavelli also wanted the “prince” to make himself feared, but not hated.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu have very different aspects about how a prince should govern his people. Machiavelli dwells over the fact, whether it is better to be loved or feared. He believes that the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finally, in the Jataka text, Siddhartha explains how the "Ten Duties of the King" help realize a just government. The most vital part of it is avihimsa, which means non-violence. According to the Buddhist view, government should not only harm nobody, but also try to promote peace (Rahula). With gun-control laws, government can prevent gun violence. So I believe that moderate gun-regulations are necessary to insure a secure…

    • 69 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu vs. Machiavelli

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Government is the essential authority of a country or state, which directly affects society because it provides key securities. How directly involved should the government be in the personal lives of society? To answer this I will look to the ideas of Lao-tzu (sixth century B.C.), believed to be author of the Tao-te Ching, and Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527), author of The Prince There are few ways in which they are similar, but have very opposite views and ideas of government.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The Master leads by emptying people’s mind and filling their cores, by weakening their ambition and toughening their resolve. He helps people lose everything they know, everything they desire, and creates confusion in those who think that they know.” (Page 19). This passage supports a number of readings. All of them centered on government. The definition of government is the organization, machinery, or agency through which a political unit exercises authority and performs functions and which is usually classified according to the distribution of power within it. Peter Bondanella insinuated, “The twentieth century has contributed a number of important…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ideas on the same topic always seem to differ from person to person. This holds true to the ideas of Machiavelli and Castiglione. The Prince, written by Machiavelli, and The Courtier, written by Castiglione, are both somewhat how-to guides for nobility, royalty, and princes. However, there are many distinct differences among the ideas of Castiglione and Machiavelli. Castiglione's philosophy leads down the path of a well-rounded person; a more peaceful manner. Machiavelli's philosophy is more straightforward and violent, where you should do anything and everything you have to do in order to achieve your goal. Both books and figures were of great importance to society.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli dictates his ideas of a great leader, and how a leader should guide his people. King offers ideas to people to better society through nonviolent courses of action. Both do seem to meet eye to eye when it comes to being merciful and not cruel towards people. The one thing that I greatly admire is Martin Luther’s individuality, he is not afraid to speak up for himself and stand up for his rights, and most importantly speak his mind. That is a big difference between the two writers; Machiavelli tries to learn from the accomplishments and mistakes from past leaders such as Cesar Borgia, Alexander, Scipio, Cyprus, etc who were all mentioned in The Qualities of the Prince. MLK becomes a leader from his truth, courage, and personal experience rather than others experiences. King distinguishes himself from the others because he was so brave and modest and didn’t ask for anything in return for trying to help the movement of racially equality. Martin Luther King’s view is more impractical when the two ideas are compared but then again, I personally agree with King’s point of nonviolent demands that will hopefully and eventually become a pure ending. If life was easy as MLK makes it sound, and if these ideas were actually implemented then we, for the most part, would live…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli claims to possess the knowledge of the “actions of great men”. What Machiavelli really means by this is that he knows much of how leaders of great nations handle their power. However, he also knows much of how these great leaders should handle their power, which is essentially what he is trying to explain to Lorenzo de Medici throughout the text. Through a large number of examples involving past leaders and their successes and failures, as well as a large amount of knowledge on the topic of political affairs accumulated over many years of study, Machiavelli explains to Lorenzo de Medici how he should go about attaining the greatness Machiavelli knows he can attain. This “greatness” that Machiavelli refers to is Lorenzo de Medici’s…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government assumes that if society confines gun control that criminal activity will be reduced, however, offenders generally aim for victims who are unarmed. This would make it effortless for the criminal to assault a bystander while it leaves the victim vulnerable.Controlling weapons will not keep them out of felon’s hands. Each individual has the entitlement to protect themselves against unjustified acts. Righteous residents would have a sense of security knowing that firearms could be carried legally for his or her own protection and safety. A decrease in rifle sales, along with ammunition, will damage a state’s economy. Aside from criminal abuse, firearms are valued for friendly competitions and hunting purposes. Individuals who possess guns are put to a challenge to see if they can handle true responsibility. Besides regulating firearms completely, there are other alternatives to resolve gun…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to bear arms has a long history in American tradition. From the time colonists settled the North American soil, Americans have held weapons to protect themselves. Armed citizen-soldiers won America 's freedom from English rule more than two centuries ago. Partly because of this long-standing tradition, attempts to restrict a citizen 's right to own a gun evoke strong emotions. When the Mayflower landed on American continent, the first group of immigrants faced the deserted soil and various beasts, weapons helped them survive. (Sandra M. 2009, p.1)Then, weapons played an important role in open up virgin soil in the west. Americans regard guns as their lives because they believe the guns can against to tyranny. The War of Independence is an example. At that time, American people realized that guns were the last shelter of protecting the rights of people. People have their freedom to overthrow the tyranny, but they could not do it without guns. So the gun ownership is an individual right guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Although the Constitution confirms all the freedom of citizens, they are still afraid if the government goes to the bad. So people rely on the guns. Times have passed and circumstances, the government of the USA stays away from the danger of tyranny, the purpose of gun ownership has changed. People use guns to protect themselves and their family. There used to be an eighty-year-old lady…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Locke, distinguished themselves from the ideas and philosophies of the ancients by their own exploration of the individualist, the responsibilities of the state and government and the nature of the two. But what really distinguished these modern thinkers from those of the ancients, is their ability to take the teachings of the ancients and evolve it with the society that is very much alike to our modern day world. As many political theorists may know, Plato and Aristotle is generally seen as an inspirational and transitional figure between the ancient and the modern political philosophers. Unlike that of the ancients, Machiavelli was not concerned that a government should be an living moral force that was capable of inspiring its people. In Machiavelli's The Prince, he advocates that order is more important than virtue and thus, morality is in many ways impractical. The Prince is an blueprint created by Machiavelli for those who seek to obtain and maintain power in ways that the ancient works did not . Opposite to those of the ancients, Machiavelli's work could be characterized as an down-to-earth, realistic and self-interested text, which is the direct opposite…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confucius And Plato

    • 867 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Confucius and Plato were two of the most respected and widely known thinkers. There philosophies of how people should be governed, what characteristics make for a good leader, and other thoughts have influenced many aspects of the ancient and present world. Confucius and Plato’s ideas have benefited their own civilizations and later civilizations, and they both shared many similarities and differences in their ideas.…

    • 867 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays