Preview

Machiavelli entering into evil

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli entering into evil
Machiavelli entering into evil
In chapter VIII, Machiavelli believed that the necessity of being cruel is really important for the princes or leaders. He does not hesitate to support the necessity of cruelty and crime in founding power; however the cruelty has to be limited; otherwise the princes will be hated. Machiavelli argued that cruel acts must be committed only as necessary, but all at once and then ceased, so that the populace will forget them. “Hence it should be noted that in talking hold of a state, he who seize it should review all the offenses necessary for him to commit, and do them all at a stroke, so as not to have to renew them everyday and, by not reviewing them, to secure men and gain them to himself with benefits” (Prince, 38). What does Machiavelli mean on entering into evil? Machiavelli believed that as a prince or leader, that person has to know how to do either good by mercy and force by cruelty when it is necessary.
Machiavelli believed that there are two kinds of combat that the prince should know how to use it properly. They are laws and force. Machiavelli refers laws to the humankind, which is mercy, and force to the beast, which is cruelty. Being a prince has to know how to use either laws or force at the certain time (Prince, 69). For instance, in chapter XVIII, Machiavelli used two animals, the fox and the lion, in order to strengthen his idea of using force as necessity. The fox is used as a symbol for wisdom and cunning. As a fox, it is able to recognize traps. Thus, a prince must be able to outmaneuver his enemies; however, since a fox can’t drive away the wolves, it is not enough for a prince to have just only fox. He must also be like a lion. Lion is a symbol for courage, ferocity, strong, and cruel. As a lion, it is able to drive way wolves, but the lion can’t recognize traps like the fox “Thus, since a prince is compelled of necessity to know well how to use the beast, he should pick the fox and lion, because the lion does

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the excerpt Machiavelli uses logos to talk about this issue in a logical manner. His first step in approaching this topic is when he states to the reader that others have tried to discuss how a prince should act. Machiavelli states that he is doing something along the same lines but what he says is that a prince must be able to do what is not…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of Machiavelli’s standards for rulers of a country is to be focused on warfare by claiming, “A prince ought to have no other aim or thought, nor select…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli Paper

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Machiavelli also talked about how to become a military genius. The prince must be “half human and half beast” in war. If one is only human than he will lose most of his battles to equally strong and stronger powers. The prince must study numerous battle tactics and the geography of his territory to make elaborate battle plans. “A prince ought to have no other aim or…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli thought human nature was two-dimensional. He saw humans as predictable, foreseeing their responses to the princes’ actions. Because humans are so unsophisticated in Machiavelli’s eye, they can only love or hate their prince, making them unable to see an intermediate to the good and bad in their ruler. Humans’…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "prince must know how to make good use of the nature of the beast…..he should choose from among the fox and the lion; for the lion cannot defend itself from traps and the fox cannot protect itself from wolves. It is therefore necessary to be a fox in order to recognize the traps and a lion in order to frighten the wolves." Machiavelli in this chapter describes how necessary it is for a person to have instincts of two kinds. You can't be a powerful leader if you don't know how to win a war, and you can't be a smart leader if you cannot get out of one. Kastely argues "We argue by description, by narration, by types of inference, by ethical embodiment, and by other means…..acknowledge that both reasoning and character do play important roles in argument." It is proven that Machiavelli metaphor does support Kastely's argument. As Kastely had said, both reasoning and character play important roles in argument; as the fox and the lion play as characters and the concept of the fox being the smart one, the lion being the aggressive one, it shows reasoning. So is that why we have two sides to make one…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Strength of argument): For Machiavelli, he believes that a prince should be feared than loved by the people and he specifies, “..a wise prince should build his foundation upon that which belongs to him, not upon that which belongs to others; he must strive only to avoid hatred, as has been said” (Jacobus 47). However, in this case, his argument can be flawed and turned against him. (Tempering the Position): Although Machiavelli does a really great significant job of using logic, reason, and history to convince his readers the proper way a prince should rule; however, he didn’t imply support to show how a prince to avoid being hated by his people because, he too knows, that there will be some people who will learn to hate one from their actions they perform. (Conversation): As a matter of fact, I have experienced a situation similar to what Machiavelli doesn’t want to happen. I am not at all a prince, but I have had people hate me for my beliefs, my attitude, or my actions. There was this one time where this girl began to grow this hatred towards me just because I kicked a pit-bull so he wouldn’t bite this little 6-year old I baby sat. My intention wasn’t to harm the dog, but it was the only way to buy me some time to be able carry the boy back inside my house safely. Even though this act I committed was considered animal cruelty, I had to do it to save the child. However, the girl still went against me on this action, so there goes to show that people can hate someone else because of how they see and…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Queen Elizabeth of England was prime example of a Machiavellian leader. She was both loved and respected by her people, was politically and militarily strong, and sly in advancing her career as the monarch of England and leader of the Anglican church. All of which are examples of a Machiavellian ruler. In Machiavelli's The Prince there are many things he entails a prince must be in order to gain and maintain power.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Cruelty

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Hobbes, causing harm without a cause creates an environment where a certain type of war thrives: cruelty (Hobbes 1996, 101)…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Machiavelli, it is better to be feared than it is to be loved. Of course, being loved and feared is ideal, however, this is impossible. In that case, the prince should opt to be feared by his subjects. For one thing, a prince needs his subjects to be obedient. In order to make them obedient a prince must inspire his subjects to fear him.…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's Analysis

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Even when a prince wishes to be merciful, the fear must overpower to insinuate the control over the people the ruler is watching over. Fear brings order in Machiavelli’s eyes. It is difficult to bring both fear and love into the same category, but a prince is better off being feared rather than being loved. Hannibal, a man who led an army against Rome, was known for his cruelty. Hannibal was in charge for more than fifteen years in 200 B.C.E. It was extremely necessary for Hannibal to be seen as cruel due to the fact that he was leading an army, and he must show no mercy against the opponent, this gives the entire army strength and hatred for the opponent also. Hannibal’s inhuman cruelty brought the community together as one (Jacobus,…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli, arguably the finest political theorist of his time, wrote in his famous work “The Prince” that a ruler use any methods available to him to maintain stability, for even though some methods might seem abusive and purely attempts toward staying in power, in reality they benefit the people because the ruler manages to maintain stability which is all the people could ask for. If another country is about to attack yours and your people are at risk, would you even hesitate in bribing the other country's ruler or diplomat to prevent escalation? True, the ethics are questionable, but being that the ends are so positive, it would be futile to look at it otherwise. Plain and simple, the means are irrelevant if the ends are positive enough to trump them. Machiavelli defends these conclusions using both explicit and implicit language.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli and Morality

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When reading Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince, one can't help but grasp Machiavelli's argument that morality and politics can not exist in the same forum. However, when examining Machiavelli's various concepts in depth, one can conclude that perhaps his suggested violence and evil is fueled by a moral end of sorts. First and foremost, one must have the understanding that this book is aimed solely at the Prince or Emperor with the express purpose of aiding him in maintaining power. Therefore, it is essential to grasp his concepts of fortune and virtue. These two contrary concepts reflect the manner in which a Prince should govern while minimizing all chance and uncertainty. This kind of governing demands violence to be taken, however this is only done for the strict purpose of maintaining his throne, and generating both fear and admiration from his people. In all cases of violence, Machiavelli limits the amount of violence that needs to be taken down to the minimum, and most cases the victims of these acts are enemies of the people. Behind the violence, the prince is essentially taking the role of the villain and assuming all "bad" acts so that his people do not have to suffer and commit the acts themselves. In addition, all the Prince asks for is to not threaten his power and to respect it. In the 16th Century, this request is feeble compared to those of other hierarchical Monarchies. In the end, Machiavelli's Prince assumes all the burden of violence while leaving his noble people to act as they feel accordingly without worry of their lively hood. This is Machiavelli's ultimate stroke of morality.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Insight on Machiavelli

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many times in philosophy people will bounce around the topic of a god, and even some who believe a god is real may not necessarily believe that their god is working in their lives daily. For me, Yahweh is the only logical explanation for our existence that I can come up with. Most philosophers would look at the last statement and tell me that it is not logical from their point of view for a god to even be in the picture. Humans have many emotions and many different aspects of their lives that form who we are. When you look at the work The Prince, written by Machiavelli you can clearly see how the mind can be filled with so many different ideas on how we are supposed to live this life. From the basics, which includes creation versus evolution, to even how people perceive you on a daily basis? Machiavelli is very concerned with power of all things. In his book, he has devised his ultimate plan to be a successful and powerful ruler. There are real questions to be asked when studying his works though. As I was reading I noticed that faulty logic was one of his main problems throughout the course of this work. The mind is a very powerful thing. We were created so smart that we can literally believe anything that we can come to consider. Logical stability is key to maintaining the power of the mind, which I believe Machiavelli did an extremely poor job of.…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays