Preview

Machiavelli's Cycle of Governance and 'Checks and Balances' Ideology (Discourses) 516 Word Summary.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
542 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Machiavelli's Cycle of Governance and 'Checks and Balances' Ideology (Discourses) 516 Word Summary.
Nicolo Machiavelli's 'Discourses on Livy' written 1513-1517, is a commentary on the work of Titus Livy (59 BC - AD 17) a Roman historian who wrote a monumental history of Rome entitled 'Ab Urbe Condita' literally translating as 'from the founding of the city (Rome)'.
What Machiavelli set out to detail within the Discourses in essence, is the refined knowledge gleaned from an in depth analysis of Livy's accounts, observations of the legislative, socio-political and military management structures that provided Ancient Rome such a stable and economically fruitful empire.

Concerning the structures of governance as it was in 16th century florence, Machiavelli expressed the opinion that only six forms of government exist that maintain a perpetual cycle of short lived power before sucuming to, what he viewed as a natural end. This is brought about either due to a successful insurection and instalment of a form of government which evolved out of oppression or a form of government that eventually grew to become greedy and corrupt through generational changes.
The model Machiavelli presents begins with a society in a 'state of nature' or 'Anarchy' that exists until the people begin to realise strength in numbers and seek leadership from the foremost individual who assumes rulership, thus evolving into a 'Monarchy'.
The good Monarch is however, succeeded by corrupt rulers who use their power for their own gain and control through 'Tyranny'. The Tyrant is eventually overthrown by a rebellion and the rebels retain control amongst themselves collectively producing an 'Aristocracy'. The Aristocrats are then succeeded by a generation that again, begins to use its powers to oppress the people and becomes an 'Oligarchy'.
Like the Tyrant, they are overthrown by the oppressed who then form a 'Democracy'.
As time progresses, order and control dissolve completely until we find ourselves in a 'state of nature' or 'Anarchy' once again.

As Machiavelli saw it, because of man's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This is a significant analysis of Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince. This book explores multiple concepts on leadership and governance for a Prince to legislate on his road to success. Therefore, I will bring a compelling conclusion on how Russian President Vladimir Putin is a modern Machiavelli. To get a full understanding towards Niccolo Machiavelli’s political theory, we must first examine what’s managed to inspire his view of an ideal government. In the book, The Prince, Machiavelli introduces insightful claims on how the Roman Empire’s legitimacy brought a secure and stable society. In fact, presenting the Roman Empire’s platform helped the reader to thoroughly understand Machiavelli’s political theory regarding governance and the…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was at his time and continues to be now days one of the most influential and revolutionary authors known throughout the centuries. His writings, distinct from other renaissance authors of the epoch, make emphasis on his personal views and his opinions on the political matters taking place in Florence, Italy. Further discussed in the text are two of Machiavelli’s most renowned works, The Prince and the Discourses on Livy. Both books comprehend Machiavelli’s understandings of politics and explicit analysis on the various methods of governments with respect to principalities and republics.…

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Machiavelli, no matter how extreme, violent at times, rigorous, and blunt he may come across, by setting examples and guides structured around the utilization of ruthlessness and egocentric cunning as the process of gaining political power, showed what a clear mind he had on what it takes to be an awe-inspiring leader, master of the art of winning a battle, and conquering lands. In this paper, by comparing the two, human nature and political potency, through the use of different ideologies of both, Plato and Machiavelli, corroborated that they were very powerful, unparalleled influences in the philosophy of human nature and the processes of political power as theorist of their…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Niccolỏ Machiavelli’s lifetime, Italy’s city-states were in turmoil, and he was extremely interested in the politics behind the chaos.1 Machiavelli advised principalities on the proper way to conduct themselves by using his study of human nature. His understanding of human greed, disloyalty, and predictability created a vision of politics that utilizes power for a prince to maintain stability. Machiavelli created power-politics, his vision of how to stabilize a principality, in The Prince.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu and Machiavelli on Government and Those Who Govern Machiavelli, in “The Prince” and Lao-Tzu in “”Thoughts from the Tao-te Ching” have very opposing views. In their writings, they differ on topics such as qualities of a leader, functions of government, and human nature and the world around them. Here I will describe each of their views and compare the differences. Both Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu are philosophers writing in regard to Government, giving advice in ways that they feel people should be governed. Although they both composed their writings long ago, some of the advice given can still be put to good use in our modern world today. Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu are both very intelligent men, and have very clear perspectives on the topics they write about. On the topic of “Qualities of a leader”, Machiavelli has such strong opinions as to how a ruler should carry himself. He writes about whether it is best to be loved or feared, ultimately coming to a conclusion that a leader must be feared in order to govern his people. In his opinion, a leader who is loved is not doing his job. Machiavelli is almost demanding and has a strong need to control. He advises to be a stern leader, obtaining and maintaining power. He seems very power hungry. He discusses trustworthiness, good and bad reputations, and being knowledgeable in history and military. He believes that a leader needs to be perceived and strong and powerful. Machiavelli takes credit for all good in the government. To Machiavelli it is important to not appear weak to others, especially the people. He does not trust his people, and his role is a dictator. Lao-Tzu’s opinion on the qualities of a leader is very different than that of Machiavelli’s. His idea of a leader is compassionate, modest and moral. He believes that a leader should be loved by his people. It’s important to him to be content and confident, stating, “Because he…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli believed in the idea of a strong leader. The leader should be feared more than he is loved, if he is even loved at all. A leader shouldn 't be hated, a hated leader will be rebelled and possibly killed, but a leader can not be loved at all. He believes that if a leader is loved, he wouldn 't be feared and no one will listen to him or what he wants to do. Machiavelli believed that war was needed and a nation should keep a strong military at all times. War shouldn 't be high on taxes though, because taxes have a possibility to cause a rebellion. A rebellion is an act of hatred and could possibly lead to death of the…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    He begins with the final fact of history on how the decision to remain in Rome came to be with a satirical and ironic undertone that after Camillus long oration of persuasion it came down to what he says was the ‘’chance remark of a centurion on duty’’. He clearly states of which words had convinced the Senate to accept the omen—‘’we might as well stop here’’ and his presentation of this part of history is undeniably truthful, although he might add in his sarcastic comments. Yet his judgement becomes impaired as soon as he begins to outline the city’s reconstruction. Now it may have been that the city was ill-planned, but Livy goes on about how ‘’nobody bothered to see that the streets were straight’’—it seems to be instead of a presentation of history, that he goes on a little rant of what could have been done to maintain the precious state that his beloved Rome was and he is unable to stop his prejudice of the city’s beauty. He describes Rome as a ‘’squatter’s settlement than a properly planned city’’ and it is clearly shown that Livy has also contribute bigotry comments into his presentation of history. Although Livy may have presented a very well written book of facts of Rome his judgement has been clouded by his passionate patriotic views of…

    • 4675 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli wrote and studied the change in political beliefs in France and Italy. Machiavelli was a descendant from Florence like Dante but Machiavelli came from a different political climate. Florence had changed many times since Dante’s oligarchy succumbed to the power of rich Signori who gained control of the councils of government. The Signori passed laws that had the upper classes fight to take away power from the lower classes. Slowly the oligarchy became a monarchy with fake republics to be able to give the people a place to air their grievances.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli analyses the strengths and weaknesses of both auctorial governments and monarchal governments in his works The Prince and The Discourses. According to Machiavelli, governments, no matter what form they take, descend into corruption. Aristocracies become oligarchy’s, monarchies become tyrannous, etc. (Machiavelli, 111). Thus, Machiavelli states that the superlative governmental system is for all three forms of ‘good governments’ to be combined under one constitution. In this way, each form of government is better able to keep the others in check. However, Machiavelli favors the republican form of government over principalities because he believes it is better able to stave off corruption and is able to make better decisions.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under this system, what is the balance between the people and the government? How much power do the people have? In Machiavelli’s system, the monarch has all the power and the people have no power. In order to stay in power, the ruler can use dishonesty and cruelty to his…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classics

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The ways in which history is recorded and expressed is an art itself. There is only one truth to the past, but there are infinite ways in which an author can convey the truth. Focusing on a subject like Rome where the records are scarce and the legitimacy of those records are challenged; Livy and Polybius use two different methods to express the past. Although these authors differ in their methods, similar explanations of ideal roman virtues can be seen through comparison. These various records of Rome’s history allow readers to better understand the context based on their interpretive preferences. Essentially, Livy expresses ideal roman virtues through a narrative context, while Polybius uses a more analytical context.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We will discuss the type of Constitutions that were laid out in both books. In The Prince, Machiavelli begins with descriptions and definitions of different types of principalities, making it clear that The Prince is concerned with Autocratic (Government by a single person having unlimited power) or Monarchical regimes (a form of government in which supreme authority is vested in a single and usually hereditary figure, such as a King, and whose powers can vary from those of an absolute despot to those of a figurehead), not Republics (The Prince, pg 14-15). In The Discourses, Machiavelli, describes using three good forms of government, which are Monarchy, Aristocracy and Democracy (a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives) (The Discourses on Livy, pg 27). He makes this statement by observing…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: The History of Rome by Titus Livius. Translated from the Original with Notes and Illustrations by George Baker, A.M.. First American, from the Last London Edition, in Six Volumes (New York: Peter A. Mesier et al., 1823). Retrieved from: http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=170&Itemid=27…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s essay, “The Qualities of the Prince” is a very interesting piece of literary work that has an atypical way of depicting the qualities of a successful leader. Machiavelli developed a way of thinking that changes the human perspective on what a quality leader is made of. He took what people were afraid to say aloud and voiced it in a way that almost unraveled the truth about what people in power were really like. Machiavelli comes to a junction is his essay when he writes; “being disarmed makes you despised”. When Machiavelli says this he means to say that in order for someone to appear powerful they must be armed and physically capable of warfare. In his essay he very clearly portrays that in order for someone to have control and ultimate power, they must have the means to start a war.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays