Lowering The Drinking Age
The legal drinking age in the United States is set at twenty-one years of age. I believe that considering twenty-one as the legal age of maturity is absurd. Who is it to say that just because an individual is twenty-one means that they are mature enough to consume alcohol in a responsible manner? Changing the legal drinking age to eighteen should be imposed. Eighteen year-old individuals can take on many adult responsibilities, but they do not have the right to consume alcohol. Many people feel this is unfair while others disagree and think it’s best. There is a huge controversy over whether to keep the legal drinking age at twenty-one, or to lower it to the legal age of adulthood, eighteen. Congress passed the National Minimum Purchase Age Act in 1984. This law was passed to push each state to alter their legal drinking age to twenty-one years of age. The congress thought that if they increased the minimum drinking age that it would save a substantial number of lives each year. They assumed that a twenty-one year old individual was more mature than the usual eighteen year-old. That, in my honest opinion, was a big mistake. Just because an individual lives to be twenty-one does not define how mature they are. For instance, there are many teenagers in the world that are noticeably more mature than the typical twenty-one year-old. The deciding factor of legality in drinking should not be age, but relatively maturity and ability to handle responsibility. 4,6 The twenty-one restriction look as if it’s out of date in today’s society. Many guardians of today’s teenagers were legally permitted to drink at the age of eighteen. Teenagers today face more responsibility and are treated much differently from the way their parents were treated. If twenty-one is considered so mature, then why is eighteen considered an adult? At the age of eighteen, an individual can vote, serve on a jury, stay out without a curfew, leave home, drive,...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document