Low-Class Eat Foods
Great writers make arguments based off facts, current issues, emotions, and logical reasons to convey an important message on a topic. Authors have different ways of approaching their audience through writing styles such as Pathos, Logos and Ethos which taps into the cognition of people. Writers use the idea of an argument to state their position on various subjects. Others use the concept of argument in their writing to destroy socially constructed norms such as the stereotypical views of African-Americans in the United States. The argument is an important aspect of exchanging information based off one believes and reason to share knowledge with the local people to demand change for the good or bad. Overall, this essay discusses the purpose
…show more content…
It is not spring that most people have a health effect resulting from the foods they eat because it is not compatible with the body. In addition, people of low-class states don't have the time to cook home meals which proves to be a lot healthier than eating hot Cheadle's. In Miller reading, she meets a lady name Tiffany that is a single mother with two kids that work an excessive amount of hours on the daily basis. Tiffany hardly cooks because she does not have the time or energy to cook for her children so she buys them because of her work. This reading has more of an emotional approach which makes it pathos because it deals with human dialogue that allow readers to have empathy. For example " A home cooked meal just don’t happen every night”(Divided We Eat,2010).Miller is found to be credible because she interviews various people regarding their eating habits, fanatical statues, and the statues of household. However, she lacks actual statics of people who are low-income families and if there are a two parent household or not. However, she gives people experience of their eating habits such as Tiffany which subjects readers to become more believable of Miller positioned on food security. Generally Miller proves that food insecurity or bad eating more and likely occurs in low-income families or one parent household because of the lack of in every rather in the two parent household work is shared equally. Nevertheless, Miller is optimistic that every household are able to produce proper home cooked meals which, in the long run, prevents healthy risk such as obesity or heart
It is not spring that most people have a health effect resulting from the foods they eat because it is not compatible with the body. In addition, people of low-class states don't have the time to cook home meals which proves to be a lot healthier than eating hot Cheadle's. In Miller reading, she meets a lady name Tiffany that is a single mother with two kids that work an excessive amount of hours on the daily basis. Tiffany hardly cooks because she does not have the time or energy to cook for her children so she buys them because of her work. This reading has more of an emotional approach which makes it pathos because it deals with human dialogue that allow readers to have empathy. For example " A home cooked meal just don’t happen every night”(Divided We Eat,2010).Miller is found to be credible because she interviews various people regarding their eating habits, fanatical statues, and the statues of household. However, she lacks actual statics of people who are low-income families and if there are a two parent household or not. However, she gives people experience of their eating habits such as Tiffany which subjects readers to become more believable of Miller positioned on food security. Generally Miller proves that food insecurity or bad eating more and likely occurs in low-income families or one parent household because of the lack of in every rather in the two parent household work is shared equally. Nevertheless, Miller is optimistic that every household are able to produce proper home cooked meals which, in the long run, prevents healthy risk such as obesity or heart