Preview

Locke and Hobbes: Cause of Religious Toleration

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1970 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Locke and Hobbes: Cause of Religious Toleration
Locke and Hobbes Cause of Religious Toleration
Kevin Kang
Professor Bartlett
Section Leader: Alexander Duff

Historically, Locke’s treatment of toleration was one riddled with religious change, religious turmoil, and political changes that were shaped largely by religious tensions. This was a time when religion, specifically the Christian Church, became fractioned and led to widespread war and death in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Locke’s Letter on Toleration promoted separation of church and state, arguing that each institution has legitimacy and power in certain areas. The state exists to protect people’s interests, and can use force to protect these interests. However, the state will not be able to coerce its people to believe in a certain religion. In Leviathan, Hobbes provides ideas that support Locke’s toleration of religion. Hobbes belief in the state of nature, state of war, and covenants helps to paint a clearer picture of a world without religious intoleration. Locke’s plea for tolerations is one of religious toleration in general but more specifically toleration among Christians. Locke speaks out against Christians whom “deprive (men) of their estates, maim them with corporal punishments, starve and torment them in noisome prisons, and in the end even take away their lives…”(Letter p.24). This type of intolerance is itself intolerable because it violates many mandates that should characterize a true Christian. The mandates of charity and meekness are violated, and those who have committed these aggressive and violent actions against others are in themselves hypocritical. These people are usually careless about their own virtues, imposing on others something they don’t practice. According to Locke, instead of looking into others moral salvation, they should practice looking into their own moral salvations as well as the salvations of family and friends. These same people are spending time and effort on trivial things like doctrinal

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At first sight, Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government, seemed quite similar to Hobbes’s Leviathan. They both believed that a state of nature is a state that exist without government. They believe that men are created equal in this state, however Hobbes argues that because of self-preservation, man possessed the desire to control over other man. Locke, on the other hand, reasons with a more peaceful and pleasant place.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Gauthier, D. (1969) The Logic of ‘Leviathan’: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year of 1689 was a year of change. With the beginning of the Glorious Revolution starting just a year preceding, and King James II being overthrown, the time was prime for John Locke to speak out. John Locke wrote the book Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration as written proof of his personal opinion. He speaks out to the reader precisely about his feelings and why he is argumentative against others views. Locke’s purpose in writing this book was to not only attack Sir Robert Filmer’s “Patriarcha (Locke Page 7)” in the First Treatise, but to speak out to the community about what they do not know in the Second Treatise.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Hobbes, the need of an outright power, as a Sovereign, took after from the utter ruthlessness of the State of Nature. The State of Nature was totally grievous, thus objective men would will to submit themselves even to outright power with a specific end goal to escape it. For John Locke, 1632-1704, the State of Nature is an altogether different sort of spot, thus his contention concerning the social contract and the way of men's relationship to power are subsequently entirely distinctive. While Locke uses Hobbes' methodological gadget of the State of Nature, as do for all intents and purposes all social contract scholars, he utilizes it to a very distinctive end. Locke's contentions for the social contract, and for the privilege of residents…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke and Hobbes

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    How does the founders' view of power affect the framers' reactions to John Locke? According to Locke, how does man enter the political society and what is the purpose of that society? What obligations does the government have in the civil society? What obligation does the individual have? How do Hobbes and Locke differ? Do you think Americans would agree with Locke? You may read the first paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence to assist you. What evidence do you have to support your view?…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the eighteenth century philosophers John Locke and Francious-Marie Arouet.supported the idea of religious toleration. Locke philosophy was that people were born good or pure. According to Locke, people were generally good that they should be allowed more rights and freedoms. In which also his philosophy was that people were entitled to three natural rights (life, liberty, and own property which he defended. Locket said in the letter concerning toleration.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Exegesis of Thomas Hobbes

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes was an Englishman who wrote the Leviathan during the English Civil War in the 17th century. Naturally Hobbes spends chapter five, and most of the Leviathan describing how to avoid internal conflict. Hobbes argues that by using logical reasoning and eliminating disagreement a state can avoid internal conflict. Hobbes begins chapter five with a definition for reason and the operations that are involved. Hobbes continues his explanation of reason by describing the proper use of reasoning and how absurdity arises. He elaborates on errors and absurdities, explicitly their causes. Hobbes ends chapter five with his description of the connection between reason and science.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs. Locke

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Locke, John, and C. B. Macpherson. Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub., 1980. N. pag. Print.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To Locke’s claim that men cannot give away power they do not have, Hobbes would respond that the power of a sovereign “was not given, but left to him” because his power comes from nature, not from the people (XXVIII.2).…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke's reasoning for religious tolerance is all over the place. He first explains that no man has any right to enforce his beliefs on another man, stating that faith comes from within one's self, and it is not considered faith if it be thrust upon another. He also states that the civil government shall be separate from the church. The government has no authority in the confines of the church, and the church cannot enforce its teachings in the…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke's second treatise, the announcement of his own political logic, rejects numerous announcements in Leviathan (1651) by Thomas Hobbes, which advocates total power in the individual of the…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    [3] Fred Anderson, Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the fate of Empire in British North America 1754-1766,(New York: Alfred A. Knopf, February 11, 2000; London: Faber and Faber, 2000).…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes' Leviathan and Locke's Second Treatise of Government comprise critical works in the lexicon of political science theory. Both works expound on the origins and purpose of civil society and government. Hobbes' and Locke's writings center on the definition of the "state of nature" and the best means by which a society develops a systemic format from this beginning. The authors hold opposing views as to how man fits into the state of nature and the means by which a government should be formed and what type of government constitutes the best. This difference arises from different conceptions about human nature and "the state of nature", a condition in which the human race finds itself prior to uniting into civil society. Hobbes' Leviathan goes on to propose a system of power that rests with an absolute or omnipotent sovereign, while Locke, in his Treatise, provides for a government responsible to its citizenry with limitations on the ruler's powers. The understanding of the state of nature is essential to both theorists' discussions. For Hobbes, the state of nature is equivalent to a state of war. Locke's description of the state of nature is more complex: initially the state of nature is one of "peace, goodwill, mutual assistance and preservation". Transgressions against the law of nature, or reason which "teaches mankind that all being equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty and possessions," are but few. The state of nature, according to Locke's Treatise, consists of the society of man, distinct from political society, live together without any superior authority to restrict and judge their actions. It is when man begins to acquire property that the state of nature becomes somewhat less peaceful. At an undetermined point in the history of man, a people, while still in the state of nature, allowed one person to become their leader and judge over controversies. This was first the patriarch of a…

    • 3013 Words
    • 87 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Age Of Enlightenment

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should this ruler fail at that task Hobbes called for a transfer of allegiance of the people. As an atheist, Hobbes argued that religion was a useful propaganda machine as it was very capable of reminding the ignorant masses of their roles and duties. He was of the opinion that human life was, by nature, ‘solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short,’ and was doubtful about the prospects for progress in a world so short on ethics. As a result, Hobbes represented the pessimistic side of the Enlightenment, who viewed progress as the result of the suppression on man’s instincts, rather than the freedom granted to those instincts. Next, diametrically opposed to the pessimistic Hobbes was John Locke. In his Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Two Treatises of Government, Locke presented his idea that man’s mind is a “table rasa,” or blank slate. His optimistic belief was that every human is inherently good, and that they can all improve through conscious effort. Locke argued that human nature was mutable, and that knowledge was gained through accumulated experience, rather than the accessing of some outside truth. He also believed in the necessity of…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are humans naturally good or evil? I will mention two philosophers with two different thoughts on this. Hobbes believed we are all naturally evil and should be contained. Locke believed humans are reasonable and can rule themselves. I think humans are naturally evil, but Locke brings up some valid points as well.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays