Preview

Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
133 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor
The ethical issue of altruism has been a question of debate among philosophers. This is something explain that nature of the concepts. In “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor,” Hardin employs the metaphor of a lifeboat to illustrate the potentially destructive consequence of unlimited foreign aid, as to oppose the act of altruism; in “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” the singer makes scenario that two series to the people to help children who are in poverty. First of all, people have a lot s of differences of views, but these imaginary situation make us to a distorted reality. The usage of hypothetical scenarios and statistics have the problem of misrepresentation and oversimplification of actuality. Therefore, the incorrect
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    An Analysis Of Peter Singer's Idea Of Altruistic Poverty
    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page

    An Analysis Of Peter Singer's Idea Of Altruistic Poverty

    I was first introduced to Peter Singer’s idea of altruistic poverty at Governor’s School. It suggests that to achieve social and economic equality, individuals have to give away all they have until they reach the poverty line. While trying to wrap my mind around this questionable solution to such a complex issue, I realize that my previous way of thinking had been so egocentric. If I gave everything unnecessary for my survival what would my life look like? However, as this idea unveiled my own inadequacies as an altruistic individual, I began to wonder why capitalism does not encourage this altruism from all economic classes.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PSY 301 Week 4 DQ1
    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    PSY 301 Week 4 DQ1

    Examine the concept of altruism and altruistic behavior. What does it mean for someone to behave altruistically? What is gained from this action, and how does it differ from egoistic behavior? What are some reasons why people would want to help one another, without regard for personal gain or benefit? In addition, explain the bystander effect. If we all have a genuine desire to help one another, why is the effect so common? How can we prevent it from occurring?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping Poor
    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping Poor

    In the seventies and eighties, a neoconservative development broke with the official talk of America's great intentions. New voices started to substitute an intense, hardcore anticipation of what was required for national survival in an overpopulated world. Garrett Hardin is a main neoconservative scholarly who in his generally distributed about compositions assaults the conventional compassionate perspectives of the "blame ridden," "inner voice stricken" liberal. He has a doctorate in science from Stanford University, has taught at the University of California at Santa Barbara, and has addressed at different colleges. He is the writer of books and articles on "human biology"- the investigation of how human life is maintained on our planet.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lifeboat Ethics By Nancy Ehrenberg: Article Analysis
    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lifeboat Ethics By Nancy Ehrenberg: Article Analysis

    In the United States and in many other countries when women get pregnant, they often talk about the immediate bond between mother and her unborn child. However, in other countries and cultures, women don't feel a bond with their unborn children until the child is born healthy, happy and grows to a certain age. There are people who think the issue of bonding with your child is culturally based and others argue that this bonding takes place naturally. While Nancy Scheper-Hughs argues that mother-infant bonding is culturally based and occurs over a period of time, Lucinda J. Peach refutes this argument by saying that there is an immediate and natural bond between a mother and unborn child. I will compare and contrast these two articles and their…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor
    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor

    The world consists of different people, civilizations, and ways of life. There are many situations that call for different ways of handling them, like poverty, overpopulation, resources, and famine aid. Two very different points of view about these issues are espoused in two very different essays written decades apart, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor” by Garrett Hardin and “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift. Hardin’s view of civilization and the world, although harsh, has facts that could help improve the issues. Even though Swift’s opinion has personal perspective, it isn’t very realistic.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment
    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer Famine Rhetorical Analysis
    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peter Singer Famine Rhetorical Analysis

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Deaton's Analysis: Corresponding Money To Saving Lives?
    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Deaton's Analysis: Corresponding Money To Saving Lives?

    In his essay, Deaton claims that sending money to save lives doesn’t have the impact that effective altruists believe and can even cause harm to those they are trying to help. He argues that if we truly want to help the most people, we should solve the larger issues that are behind the poverty and lack of healthcare that effective altruists commonly target with their donations. While it is true that only sending money to charities won't necessarily solve all of the problems in poor countries, Deaton overlooks the importance of the lives that are saved through these donations. There are still many people who would die or suffer without the work of charities like those that effective altruists donate to. We should not only try to create larger political and societal change, but also…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Motivation And Justification By Peter Singer
    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Motivation And Justification By Peter Singer

    Effective altruists recognize that the worth of anyone is equal to their own and believe that everyone should work towards good (Singer, 2015 p. 82). Through this reasoning, effective altruists are not influence by strong emotions to help out a single, recognizable person, but are motivated to reach out to the most number of people as they can even if these people were to remain anonymous. Their minds operate so that they prioritize helping out more people rather than a smaller group (Singer, 2015, p.82). In short, in this chapter, Singer emphasizes that actions must be grounded in the reasoning of working for the good of as many people as…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Famine Affluence And Sacrifice By Peter Singer Analysis
    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Famine Affluence And Sacrifice By Peter Singer Analysis

    For those who frightened much to abandon their life, goals, projects and interests in order to save one’s life, say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, also in “ the life you can save”, Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer, Giving, sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction, it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises, “1, suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad, (2), if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening,…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor
    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor

    I already know about this topic is everything judge from mind. Ethics moral is people judge everything right or wrong; true or false; good behavior or bad behavior, as a ruler. However, the moral’s jurisdiction is wider range than the legal. Sometime we judge one’s behavior is good or bad, but who is not illegal, we should judge that in moral standpoints, he/she is vices. However, we choosing side by side in ethical dilemma, and what will we choose the side opposite with normal people’s choice?…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy 490 Altruism And Psychology Paper
    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Psy 490 Altruism And Psychology Paper

    Now, let’s look at a definition of altruism: Altruism involves the unselfish concern for other people. It involves doing things simply out of a desire to help, not because you feel obligated to out of duty, loyalty, or religious reasons. (psychology.about.com)…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Critical Response
    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Critical Response

    Singer argues that many people are not willing to put aside their wants, and make a sacrifice to help impoverished children. Now, evolutionary psychologists tell us that human nature just is not sufficiently altruistic to make it plausible that many people will not sacrifice so much for stranger (327). This statement saddens me, because what if that is your or your family, and somebody thought of you all strangers, and would not want to help your family out of poverty? Singer then explains that we ought to do things that predictably most of wouldn’t (327). Majority feel that if does benefit them in the end then why bother. Honestly, donating will benefit you it makes you feel like a better person, and you have helped an individual in need. Sometimes you should sacrifice your wants for others needs. As singer states the life of a child is more important then going to fancy restaurants, the next time you dine out know that you could…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayn Rand's Definition Of Selfishness
    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ayn Rand's Definition Of Selfishness

    Premise 4: Altruism therefore means that it permits no concept of a self-respecting, self-supporting man- a man who supports his life by his own effort and neither sacrifices himself nor others.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ayn Rand
    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ayn Rand

    1. Is Rand correct that if you accept altruism, then you end up with a lack of self-esteem and a lack of respect for others? I think Rand is wrong about altruism because, not everyone wants help; therefore it is not another persons obligation to help another if they don’t want to. When we help someone it should come from the heart not because we feel as though we have to, also when we give, without expecting in return that is true charity. However, it has nothing to do with neither lack of self-esteem nor lack of respect for others. It’s like a baby who is learning to walk. Do we continue to help the baby walk, if we do the baby may become overly dependent, and will never learn on it’s own. Now aren’t we hurting the baby by doing this? I would think so.…

    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics