Preview

La libertad y sus límites, historia y problemas modernos

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7024 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
La libertad y sus límites, historia y problemas modernos
1. Introducción

Libertad, capacidad de autodeterminación de la voluntad, que permite a los seres humanos actuar como deseen. En este sentido, suele ser denominada libertad individual. El término se vincula a de la soberanía de un país en su vertiente de 'libertad nacional'. Aunque desde estas perspectivas tradicionales la libertad puede ser civil o política, el concepto moderno incluye un conjunto general de derechos individuales, como la igualdad de oportunidades o el derecho a la educación.

2. La Libertad Y Sus Límites

Como es lógico, el reconocimiento de una libertad ilimitada haría imposible la convivencia humana, por lo que son necesarias e inevitables las restricciones a la libertad individual. La libertad se define como el derecho de la persona a actuar sin restricciones siempre que sus actos no interfieran con los derechos equivalentes de otras personas.

La naturaleza y extensión de las restricciones a la libertad, así como los medios para procurarlas, han creado importantes problemas a los filósofos y juristas de todos los tiempos. Casi todas las soluciones han pasado por el reconocimiento tradicional de la necesidad de que exista un gobierno, en cuanto grupo de personas investidas de autoridad para imponer las restricciones que se consideren necesarias. Más reciente es la tendencia que ha subrayado la conveniencia de definir legalmente la naturaleza de las limitaciones y su extensión. El anarquismo representa la excepción a todo esto, al considerar que los gobiernos son perversos por su propia naturaleza, y sostener que es preferible su sustitución por una sociedad ideal donde cada individuo observe los elementales principios éticos.

El equilibrio perfecto entre el derecho del individuo a actuar sin interferencias ajenas y la necesidad de la comunidad a restringir la libertad ha sido buscado en todas las épocas, sin que se haya logrado alcanzar una solución ideal al problema. Las restricciones son en no pocas ocasiones opresivas. La historia

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alejandro de la Fuente is writing an argument on slavery with different point of view, narrating a debate based on the Law in Latin America. The different prespectives are from Tannenbaum who is well known as a big influence during slavery, Christopher Schmidt-Nowara and Maria Elena Diaz. The author started with a confession about what he thinks of the work that this people have done and explaining their position and point of view. Slave opportunites such as slave codes, immigration and education, were part of this debate. To fiish the main claim of his article, the author gave an example of how slaves who claim their priorities gain a little of victory making an impact in the administration of justice, in this case, the local justice. Even…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first argument that the author rises is about the inseparability of faction and liberty. He suggests that the government should not be concentrated on trying to prevent the causes of faction, but just control its effects.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “A society which makes provision for participation in its good of all its members on equal terms and which secures flexible readjustment of its institutions through interaction of the different forms of associated life is in so far democratic. Such a society must have a type of education which gives individuals a personal interest in social relationships and control, and the habits of mind which secure social changes without introducing disorder”.…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the issue of factions, he proposes that there be a clear declaration within the society against factions as a condition for entry. To counter the corruption of individual wills, he proposes the introduction of a Legislator who can make the public see what they want and “conform their wills to their reason” This legislator must be “in all respects an extraordinary man in the State” who can protect the people’s right to a say in the legislature and participation in the legislative process. This is only achievable by being separate from the rest of the civil society and therefore not, himself, corruptible. By being such, he guards the people from their becoming subject to the short-sighted, impulsive goals, or from creating factions within society. This is not, however, to say that he holds all the power.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right,… to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security… such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first source, John Locke present a cautionary notion regarding the pursuit of Classical Liberalism. He advises that without the government intervening and providing citizens with security, tyranny will prevail. Similar to Classical Liberalism, Locke advocates for individualism and precedence of “natural rights” including; the right to life, liberty and property. These were deemed as inherent rights, and ones to take priority over others. Moreover, during the 17th and 18th century, the focus of Classical Liberalism was to limit the amount of laws that could be passed, and thereby unhindered the restraints on individuals.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The continuous development of industrialization bought about a massive expansion of wealth as well as the spread of slums, poverty, ignorance and disease. The increasing social inequalities in society led liberals to question and revise the ideas of classic liberalism. This was clearly seen in their differing views on freedom, the individuals and most important the economy. Classical liberals have argued that the revised version of liberals has effectively broken the principles of doctrines that defined liberalism. While Modern liberals argue that it did not fully depart from the ideas of capitalism liberalism but merely built on classical liberalism.…

    • 966 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Liberalism is a political philosophy which emphasizes on the rights of an individual, and usually the rights will assure by the government. Liberalism has turned up for around 300 years, and the complexity to explain and define liberalism is increasing as there are several forms, including classical liberalism, neo-liberalism, conservative liberalism, social liberalism, libertarianism and libertarian socialism (Mastin, 2008). Although anarchism, communism, democratic socialism, social democracy, communitarianism and liberal conservatism have the same objective with liberalism which support for democracy as well as basic equality and against authoritarianism, but it does not consider as liberalism (Haar, 2015).…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The themes of this week included, liberalism which has two strong commitments to individual freedom: commitment to freedom as an intrinsic value and commitment to individual freedom its recognition of freedom. However, classical liberalism is a political ideology that values the freedom of individuals, including the freedom of region, speech, press, assembly, and markets, as well as limited government. It was developed in 18th century Europe and first drew on Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations, and then the growing notion of social progress. If so, what are some of different classical understandings of capitalism? In this case, I understand I am studying Social Science.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ● The theme of this book is that of individual rights versus public order. As this chapter points…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Explain Natural Law Theory

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay, I will discuss the theories behind Natural Law, as well as the qualities it is seen to possess. I will explain Aquinas’ concepts and theory on Natural Law, discussing eudaimonia and the doctrine of the double effect. Finally, I will reflect on some of the positive and negative aspects, in summarising Natural Law theory.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Liberalism and Freedom

    • 2901 Words
    • 12 Pages

    one may ask whether or not the ideas and goals of classical liberalism have been…

    • 2901 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Natural Rights

    • 4743 Words
    • 19 Pages

    The theory of natural law[->4] is closely related to the theory of natural rights. During the Age of Enlightenment[->5], natural law theory challenged the divine right of kings[->6], and became an alternative justification for the establishment of a social contract[->7], positive law[->8], and government[->9] — and thus legal rights — in the form of classical republicanism[->10]. Conversely, the concept of natural rights is used by some anarchists[->11] to challenge the legitimacy of all such establishments.[1]HYPERLINK \l "cite_note-2"[2]…

    • 4743 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The source given discusses the prominence of the commonly debatable topic of individual rights and freedoms being neglected to fulfill the goals of the state. The source is clearly biased and against modern liberalism; in favor of a more collective society focusing more on the survival and prosperity of the state, rather than individual rights and freedoms. The source evidently identifies collectivism as well as authoritarianism as its most prominent ideological perspectives. If this source was a legitimate society in today’s world it would undoubtedly reject the natural rights of individuals as well as rule of law, egalitarianism along with the general will of the people. This can be most strongly supported by the following sentence stating, “The individual must serve the interests of a state.” The evidence taken from the source depicts a very strong presence of an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. This type of a society most commonly resembles the life in the medieval period, where everything and anything was used to benefit the state before benefitting its people, due to the divine right of the kings, which left no room for individual worth. The source states “Individual rights and freedoms are less important that the survival and prosperity of the state”, this is an excellent example of the thinking of the early English philosopher Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). Hobbes believed that people are motivated by selfishness and greed, to avoid disorder and turmoil; he thought people should give up their freedom to a government that will ensure order, which this government would be strong and able to suppress rebellion. The thinking of Thomas Hobbes and the source, both disagree with liberalism. Both Hobbes and the source given prefer the people of a society to peacefully hand in their rights, so that one single body of government can lead to the progressivism of the state through reform…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    commonplace book unit one

    • 3073 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This might be one of the most important readings in our book and its John Locke’s Second Treatise on Government which describes popular sovereignty and the natural rights of people. John Trenchard and Thomas Gibbons also contributed to our readings by…

    • 3073 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays