Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Lewis Corporation. Case Solution

Satisfactory Essays
885 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lewis Corporation. Case Solution
Units Unit Cost Total Cost
From the Beginning Inventory 1840.00 20.00 36800.00
From the first purchase 600.00 20.25 12150.00
From the second purchase 380.00 21.00 7980.00
2820.00 56930.00
From the Second purchase 420.00 21.00 8820.00
From the third purchase 400.00 21.25 8500.00
From the second purchase 200.00 21.50 4300.00
1020.00 21.20 21620.00
Units Unit Cost Total Cost
From the Beginning Inventory 1020.00 21.20 21624.00
From the first purchase 700.00 21.50 15050.00
From the second purchase 700.00 21.50 15050.00
Inventory Statement for 2006, FIFO Method
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of Goods Sold
Total / Cost of Goods Sold
Ending Inventory
Total / Ending Inventory
Inventory Statement for 2005, FIFO Method
From the third purchase 660.00 22.00 14520.00
3080.00 66244.00
From the third purchase 40.00 22.00 880.00
From the fourth purchase 1000.00 22.25 22250.00
1040.00 22.24 23130.00
Units Unit Cost Total Cost
From the Beginning Inventory 1040.00 22.24 23129.60
From the first purchase 1000.00 22.50 22500.00
From the second purchase 700.00 22.75 15925.00
From the third purchase 210.00 23.00 4830.00
2950.00 66384.60
From the third purchase 490.00 23.00 11270.00
From the fourth purchase 700.00 23.50 16450.00
1190.00 23.29 27720.00
Submited By;
Manish Parmar, Section: C
Roll # 2010PGP179
Inventory Statement for 2007, FIFO Method
Cost of Goods Sold
Total / Cost of Goods Sold
Ending Inventory
Total / Ending Inventory
Total / Cost of Goods Sold
Ending Inventory
Total / Ending Inventory
Units Unit Cost Total Cost
From the fourth purchase 200.00 21.50 4300.00
From the third purchase 400.00 21.25 8500.00
From the second purchase 800.00 21.00 16800.00
From the first purchase 600 20.25 12150.00
From the beginning inventory 820 20.00 16400.00
2820.00 58150.00
From the beginning inventory 1020.00 20.00 20400.00
1020.00 20.00 20400.00
Units Unit Cost Total Cost
From the fourth purchase 1000.00 22.25 22250.00
From the third purchase 700.00 22.00 15400.00
From the second purchase 700.00 21.50 15050.00
Inventory Statement for 2006, LIFO Method
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of Goods Sold
Total / Cost of Goods Sold
Total / Ending Inventory
Ending Inventory
Inventory Statement for 2005, LIFO Method
From the first purchase 680.00 21.50 14620.00
3080.00 67320.00
From the first purchase 20.00 21.50 430.00
From the beginning inventory 1020.00 22.24 22684.80
1040.00 22.23 23114.80
Units Unit Cost Total Cost
From the fourth purchase 700.00 23.50 16450.00
From the third purchase 700.00 23.00 16100.00
From the second purchase 700.00 22.75 15925.00
From the first purchase 850.00 22.50 19125.00
2950.00 67600.00
Fromt the first purchase 150.00 22.50 3375.00
From the beginning inventory 1000.00 23.50 23500.00
1150.00 23.37 26875.00
Submited By;
Manish Parmar, Section: C
Roll # 2010PGP179
Total / Cost of Goods Sold
Total / Ending Inventory
Inventory Statement for 2007, LIFO Method
Cost of Goods Sold
Total / Cost of Goods Sold
Ending Inventory
Ending Inventory
Total / Ending Inventory
Units Avg Cost Total Cost
2820.00 20.46 57685.16
1020.00 20.46 20864.84
Units Avg Cost Total Cost
Cost of Goods Sold
Inventory Statement for 2005, Avg Method
Total / Ending Inventory
Inventory Statement for 2006, Avg Method
Cost of Goods Sold
Ending Inventory
Total / Cost of Goods Sold
3080.00 21.51 66249.30
1040.00 20.51 21330.40
Units Avg Cost Total Cost
2950.00 22.30 65773.17
1190.00 22.30 26537.00
Submited By;
Manish Parmar, Section: C
Roll # 2010PGP179
Total / Cost of Goods Sold
Inventory Statement for 2007, Avg Method
Cost of Goods Sold
Total / Cost of Goods Sold
Ending Inventory
Total / Ending Inventory
Ending Inventory
Total / Ending Inventory
FIFO LIFO Avg
2005 Total Total Total
Cost of goods sold 56930 58150 57685
Ending Inventory 21620 20400 20865
2006
Cost of goods sold 66244 67320 66249
Ending Inventory 23130 23115 21330
2007
Cost of goods sold 66385 67600 65773
Ending Inventory 27720 26875 26537
FIFO LIFO Avg
2005
95880 95880 95880
Less: Cost of goods sold 56930 58150 57685
Profit in 2005 38950 37730 38195
2006
110110 110110 110110
Ans: 1. Comparison of all the three methods
MAC - 1. Assignment # . Lewis Corporation.
Revenue
Revenue
Less: Cost of goods sold 66244 67320 66249
Profit in 2006 43866 42790 43861
2007
105463 105463 105463
Less: Cost of goods sold 66385 67600 65773
Profit in 2007 39078 37863 39689
Total Profit 121894 118383 121745
Income tax @ 40 % 48758 47353 48698
Submited By;
Manish Parmar, Section: C
Roll # 2010PGP179
Revenue
Ans:2
As can be seen from the above table, the lowest profit is found when it's calculated with the LIFO method, and same is the case with the income tax. So It's recommended that the company switches from FIFO to LIFO.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In November 2008, Danle Corporation,a public company engaging in the design, development, manufacture, and assembly of motors,was sued because of safety issue of parts it manufactured. Danle made no disclosure of the lawsuit in Form 10-K since it determined that the risk of potential loss was remote and no amount of potential damages could be reasonably estimated. In October 2009, Danle was served a second complaint for the same reason. Danle’s external counsel believed that Danle could potentially be liable for a percentage of recovery. Management made no disclosure in Form 10-k for this fiscal year since they did not believe that it was probable a loss would occur and could not reasonably estimate an exact amount of the loss. For the first and second quarters of 2010, Danle disclosed related information about the loss in the notes to its financial statements in Form 10-Q. At the end of 2010, it disclosed updated related information of the loss in its notes to consolidated financial statements in Form 10-K.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hrm 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 4852 Words
    • 20 Pages

    87. On April 1, Robert LLC purchased two units of inventory, A and B. The cost of unit A was $650, and the…

    • 4852 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sellier and Bellot company is famous as a supplier of cartridge ammunition and other firearm products since 1825. All the products are exclusive in quality and are awesome in design. Best part of Sellier and Bellot company ammunition products is high quality components used for production. It is the fact raising the company to heights among all. Sellier and Bellot .22 LR Ammunition is good choice for hunters especially for competitive shooters. Apart from them, it is awesome for militaries and law enforcement agencies. Neroxin is used in the production of ammunition which acts as anti-corrosive primer avoiding corrosion strictly. This ammunition is available in wooden boxes or crates. One crate can be used for 6250 rounds.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Berrys Bug Blaster

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Expense | $50,000.00 | | | | $805,358.66 | $805,358.66 | | Total Expenses | | $2,756,440.78 | $2,756,440.78 | | Net Income | | | $493,139.75 | | Balance Sheet 12/31/2008 | | Current Assets | | | Cash | $818,440.68 | | Accounts Receivable | $812,395.13 | | Inventory | $205,934.30 | |…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    E3-2

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Week 2 Geronimo CompanyTrial BalanceApril 30, 2012 | | Debit | Credit | Cash | $2,100 | | Accounts Receivable | 2,750 | | Prepaid Insurance | 1,700 | | Equipment | 8,000 | | Accounts Payable | | $ 3,500 | Property Tax Payable | | 560 | Geronimo, Capital | | 11,200 | Service Revenue | | 6,690 | Salaries Expense | 4,200 | | Advertising Expense | 1,400 | | Property Tax Expense | 1,800 | | | $ 21,950 | $ 21,950 | E3-2 P3-4 (a) Nov. 30 Store Supplies Expense………………1,500 Store Supplies………………… 1,500 30 Depr.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Note: Balance in AOCI, December 31, 2014 = $10,270 debit ($873,480 – $883,750) since all securities were purchased in 2014. The Anderson shares make up $49,580 - $48,750 = $830 credit of this.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Shoose For MOOs Inc

    • 869 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The market which Jim is going to penetrate is two countries in North America Canada and USA. Jim has an advantage because he located in Ontario which is the second biggest Canadian province after Quebec for the population of cows i.e. 7557 farms. The fact that Jim collected some marketing information from his students before starting the business talks about his professionalism. It means that he is a person whose data we can trust. His business idea is to sell special shoes to the farmers, whose cows have cow leg illnesses, thru three different distribution channels such as direct advertisement, farm equipment dealers, veterinaries.…

    • 869 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) This transportation model problem consists of 18 decision variables, representing the number of barrels of wastes product transported from each of the 6 plants to each of the 3 waste disposal sites:…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) Estimate the WACC that is appropriate for discounting the Collinsville plant’s incremental cash flows. You should estimate and present each component of the WACC separately, explaining briefly but clearly what assumptions you are making for each of them. In the same spirit, estimate the appropriate all-equity cost of capital for the APV-based valuation.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    a) Without considering the possibility of making the timing unit evaluate whether Waterways should buy or continue to make the small fitting.…

    • 325 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lakeside Case 2

    • 7160 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Abernethy and Chapman have to consider whether to accept new client. To do this they created a three-partner committee to screen these new clients. A partner in charge is assigned to each of the potential clients and is driven by guidelines set out by this three-partner committee.…

    • 7160 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Supply Chain Task 1

    • 2981 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Marketplace simulation helped me realize how complicated and difficult decision making can be when trying to build a company. Among the most important simulation results were utilizing the budgets and pro forma statements. Budgets are beneficial as a financial plan by listing all planned expenses and income. The purpose is to be able to forecast revenues and expenses and create a business model that operates effectively to make sure overhead can be paid.…

    • 2981 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arrow Electronics is a broad-line distributor of electronic parts, including semiconductors and passive components. It was founded in 1935 and grown to the number two position by 1980. When Stephen Kaufman, who became president in 1982 and CEO in 1986, Arrow once more began to climb, reaching the number one position among electronics distributors by 1992.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GROUP SUBMISSION: Due 27 June 2011 Midnight American Chemical Corporation CASE QUESTIONS Read the American Chemical Corporation case that was handed to you. The underlying question to be answered is should Dixon acquire the Collinsville plant. In your case write-up, you can discuss the questions given below. Please note that the given questions are to be used only as a guide for your discussion. You do not need to answer the questions in the sequence they are presented. You can use the spreadsheet called AmericanChemCorp.xls (posted on instructor) to do your computations. Financial analysis 1. Extract all the important information given in the case study (text, footnotes and exhibits) that you will need as part of your set of assumptions in cash flow analysis, e.g. the marginal tax rate, net working capital, salvage value of the Collinsville plant, etc. 2. Using the information extracted in (1) above and relevant tables in the exhibits, estimate the expected incremental free cash flows associated with the acquisition of the Collinsville plant a. Without the laminate technology. b. With the laminate technology. 3. What is the IRR for the Collinsville investment with and without the laminate technology? Using the IRR, which of the two options is better? Estimating the discount rate 4. What is the appropriate beta for the Collinsville project? 5. Estimate the cost of equity capital appropriate for the evaluation of the incremental cash flows associated with the Collinsville investment. 6. Determine the after-tax cost of debt for the project. 7. Estimate the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) appropriate for the valuation of the Collinsville investment. Project Valuation 8. Using the discount rate determined above, estimate the net present value (NPV) of the Collinsville investments a. without the laminate technology b. with the laminate technology 9. Should Dixon Corporation acquire the plant? Is the Collinsville investment attractive on economic grounds?…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ------------------------------------------------- A ------------------------------------------------- Case Study ------------------------------------------------- On ABRAMS COMPANY -------------------------------------------------…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays