2, 3, 1, and Fidelio. Most of Beethoven’s scholars could not explain regarding it so that they followed a Nottebohm’s claim. Further, Hector Berlioz also believed Nottebohm’s claim, and he stated Leonore No. 1 as the third version. However, the theorists, Albert Levinson, Hugo Riemann and Josef Braunstein denied Nottebohm’s claim in the nineteenth century and asserts the chronological order of four overtures: No.1, 2, 3, and Fidelio. Even though the chronological order of the four overtures is still debatable after discovering since 1827, it is more reasonable that Leonore No. 1 is the first version of four overtures due to the statement from Schindler regarding Leonore No. 1 as the first version, musical connection with the sketches of the Fifth symphony, and the musical development from Leonore No. 1 to Leonore No. 3. Therefore, this paper will argue the chronological order of four overtures from Leonore No. 1 as the first
2, 3, 1, and Fidelio. Most of Beethoven’s scholars could not explain regarding it so that they followed a Nottebohm’s claim. Further, Hector Berlioz also believed Nottebohm’s claim, and he stated Leonore No. 1 as the third version. However, the theorists, Albert Levinson, Hugo Riemann and Josef Braunstein denied Nottebohm’s claim in the nineteenth century and asserts the chronological order of four overtures: No.1, 2, 3, and Fidelio. Even though the chronological order of the four overtures is still debatable after discovering since 1827, it is more reasonable that Leonore No. 1 is the first version of four overtures due to the statement from Schindler regarding Leonore No. 1 as the first version, musical connection with the sketches of the Fifth symphony, and the musical development from Leonore No. 1 to Leonore No. 3. Therefore, this paper will argue the chronological order of four overtures from Leonore No. 1 as the first