Preview

Legal Defense

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
671 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Defense
Legal Defenses
Barbara Butler
CJS/220
2/1/13
Harvey Smith

Introduction
This paper will give brief description on three types of legal defenses and the elements of a crime, how the crime applies to the overall criminal procedure. It also will give a definition to what each element means.

Legal Defenses and Their Definition
A legal defense is one that satisfies all legal requirements of a court case. The three legal defenses I will be describing are insanity, self-defense, and mistake of fact.
Insanity-his or her insanity at the time of a crime meant he or she could not rationally form mens rea to commit a criminal act. (Meyer & Grant, 2003)
“Being insane at the time of one’s crime is a complete defense to crime. The idea is that the system should not punish people who do not possess mens rea. (Meyer & Grant, 2003)
Different country uses the insanity tests. The most common one used is the M’Naqhten Rule, that a person is insane if he or she was doing, or literally did not know it was wrong.
Self-defense-his or her actions were meant to protect him or herself from death or serious bodily harm. The victim of an actual or apparent deadly attack may kill another person if it is reasonably necessary to use such force to protect oneself from death or serious bodily harm. (Meyer & Grant, 2003)
Self-defense is different from other defenses to crime in that the defendant who claims self-defense is actually asserting that she or he acted appropriately.
Mistake of fact- the acts arose from an honest and reasonable mistake, such as accidentally picking up someone else’s umbrella instead of own. Mistake of fact is more akin to innocently switching briefcase at the airport because of being rushed.
“Being in aware if or misunderstanding a law is a valid defense only under limited circumstances such as violations of confusing or complicated law like as the tax load. (Meyer & Grant, 2003)
Crimes Elements
“There are three elements that must be



References: CJI Interactive Meyer, J. F., & Grant, D. R. (2003). The courts in our criminal justice system. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    A person's right to self defense begins at the moment the person reasonably believes that he or she is facing deadly force and reasonably…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJS 220: Legal Defense

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If reasonable force us used against an individual and there is a threat of imminent bodily harm or death, and the individual defends themselves, that person may be acquitted of first-degree murder. To argue perfect self-defense, and…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-defense: To assert this doctrine, the use of self-defense must be both necessary to avoid an imminent deadly attack and the force used must be both necessary and reasonable to avoid that deadly attack. No force can be used merely in retaliation or for revenge.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: The insanity defense has been used for many years and believed to began around the 1720’s where the first formal defense was used in a court in 1724. Judge Tracy, the judge that ruled over the first case coined a term “The wild beast standard” that states “for someone to be insane he must be totally deprived of his understanding and memory, and not know what he is doing anymore than an infant, a brute, or a wild beast” (Neville, 2010, pp.3-4). After the Daniel M’Naghten case, a man who attempted to kill a prime minister due to his belief that the prime minister was conspiring against him ended up killing the secretary, there was a new rule many states began to follow. After M’Naghten was found insane by multiple experts because he was unable to know the difference of right and wrong therefore he was acquitted of all charges (Neville, 2010, p. 5) a rule was developed labeled after M’Naghten.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Excuse Defense Process

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the first two weeks of this criminal justice course, this class has discussed the structure of the criminal justice system and also has reviewed the models that comprise the criminal justice system. In this paper I will examine the aspects of criminal law. I will describe the purposes of criminal law, which will entail the two main functions of criminal law, and will address how criminal responsibility could be limited. In this paper I will identify one justification and excuse defense. I will also explain why they are used. By reading this paper, one should have a description of the procedural safeguard that protects American Constitutional rights.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defensive Homicide

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The law of self defence in relation to homicide case are that a person is not guilty of murder if he or she carries out the conduct that would otherwise constitute murder while believing the conduct to be necessary to defend himself or herself or another person from the infliction of death or really serious injury. In regard to an Alternative verdict of defensive homicide on charge for murder, If on the trial of a person for murder the jury are not satisfied that he or she is guilty of murder but are satisfied that he or she is guilty of an offence against section 9AD (defensive homicide), the jury may acquit the accused of murder and find him or her guilty of defensive homicide and he or she is liable to punishment accordingly.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cja 354: Criminal Capacity

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    115). When one has committed an act of violence, he or she naturally wants to justify the reasons. For many who commit a criminal act the best defense is justification. According to the author, some examples of justification can be, “self-defense, necessity, and defense of others (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 116). Self-defense is when “a person has fundamental right to protect his or her self and that to rationally safeguard oneself from an illegal assault is a natural response when faced with a threatening situation” (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 119). Necessity is a claim made by the defense, in which, “the defendant believed it was necessary to behave illegally to prohibit or deter a greater damage or injury” (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 116). The defense of others occurs when one person defends another who appears to be in harm’s way (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 126). However, as the author states, “defense of others is sometimes called “defense of a third person,” is circumscribed in some jurisdictions by the alter ego rule” (Schmalleger, 2010, pg. 126). The defense of others can be tricky because it does not mean one can intervene in an altercation of one’s friend when that friend started the altercation itself. The alter ego rule is accepted in some jurisdictions but not in others. The alter ego rule, as stated by Schmalleger (2010), is that “some jurisdictions will hold that an individual can solely protect a third party under certain conditions and solely to the degree in which the third party could perform for his or her own benefit” (pg. 126). For example, the state of Texas, based on the Model Penal Code ignores acknowledgement this rule by allowing an individual to defend another person if, “he or she has a rational…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper will talk about the meaning of the insanity defense. It will also include the definition of the words not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) and guilty but mentally ill (GBMI). Will answer question how insanity and psychology’s role in the definition. As well as how frequently is the insanity defense is used and how successful it is. In addition to the common beliefs about the insanity defense and their accuracy. For example, it will discuss some of the concerns or major criticisms about the insanity defense and the legitimacy to those concerns.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    64). An example of this is the case of Nancy Seaman, Nancy claimed to the court that her husband, Bob, picked up a kitchen knife and chased her into the garage. Nancy in fear of her life grabbed an ax and proceeded to kill her husband (United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan South Division, 2010). Although she was unsuccessful in justifying her use of forces, this is still a good example of how someone can appeal to the court a case of self-defense. In addition, the Necessity Defense is used when the person commits a crime to avoid a larger or more dangerous crime from being committed. An example of this is the appellee of Terelle Young vs. The State of Indiana. In this case, Young fled the scene of an automobile accident, which caused injury to a woman in the opposite vehicle (In the Court Appeals of Indiana, 2014). During Mr. Young’s appeal, he stated that he only left the scene of the accident because he was in fear that the owner of the other vehicle was going to seriously harm him (In the Court Appeals of Indiana, 2014). In this case, Terelle Young did not prove his Necessity Defense (In the Court Appeals of Indiana,…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The common awareness that our legal system is based upon the belief that a person is responsible for his action, but this is not applicable to the mentally insane who commit crimes. The mentally ill use the insanity plea to keep them away from prison or the electric chair whenever they commit crimes, and these crimes are in most cases very severe. This (Insanity Defense) is an endeavor to place in morality into our so called perfect law because there is no perfect test to know if the acclaimed criminal is insane or not. Contrary to what a few people who have lost their loved ones through the act of an insane person, and most people who oppose the insanity plea say, a person who commits a crime and at the time the crime was committed he was not in his correct sate of mind and cannot differentiate between wrong and right, the person should not be held accountable for that crime according to the M'Naghten rule.…

    • 865 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stand Your Ground Law

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Nevada the justification of self-defense can only be used if you are not the original aggressor. As well as the other states, it says that the Stand Your Ground law can be used if you are at a place where you have the right to be in, you are not breaking the law and you have reason to believe your life is in danger. The Castle Doctrine in Nevada includes other several requirements such as the force used must be immediately necessary, must be in good faith, and must be a reasonable response to the aggressor's actions. (Gun Laws 101) Also the Castle doctrine specifies that the use of deadly force must be while protecting oneself from immediate threat of; rape, kidnapping, serious injury, or death. Nevada allows the doctrine to be extended to ones place of work. As well as allows no duty to retreat inside one’s home or place of…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Insanity Defense

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Despite public notions about the use of the insanity defense in criminal trials by defendants as a method of reducing their punishments, the reality is that the defense is rarely invoked, difficult to feign, and when proven, often leads to longer incarcerations than if the defendant was criminally convicted. Due to the fair nature of the insanity plea, it remains a valid form of defense for mentally handicapped people charged with crimes. Not only is it a valid form of defense, but it is a necessary one. It was set in place…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To this day, only five states deny the defendant of the use of insanity defense. The insanity defense has such a firm historical and moral origin that provide fairness to defendants who suffer from mental disorders. It is important that the government and the public to treat them with consideration; provide them with the treatment that suitable for the individual’s illness to make them better in hope of release them back into the community when they are no longer a threat to the public rather than to confine them in prison and let them…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are various types of criminal defense when it comes to criminal trials. This means the defendant and their attorney have to present evidence and arguments to show why the person should not be found guilty of the charges that have been filled against them. In every trial, a defendant has the right to argue the reason why they are innocent as well as the right to a fair and impartial jury.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Champion, D., Hartley, R., & Rabe, G. (2012). The Prosecution. In Criminal Courts: Structure, Process and Issues (Third ed., pp. 20-22). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays