Preview

Employment Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2383 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Employment Act
Table of content Content | Page | 1. Question 2………………………………………………………………. 2. Question 3 ……………………………………………………………… 3. Question 5 ……………………………………………………………… 4. Question 6 ……………………………………………………………… | 24912 |

Question 1
In Malaysia the governing law that addresses partnership matters is provided in the Partnership Act 1961. a) The general rule for the extent of a partner’s liability is that every partner in a firm is liable jointly with the other partners for all debts and obligations of the firm incurred while he is a partner. Discuss.

b) What are the ways in which a partnership may be dissolved?

Question 2
Fact of case: a. Mr. Pity bought a BMW (reg. no. KK 8888) from Mr. Kaya at purchase price of RM 32,000.00. b. Deposit RM 9,900.00 was paid and a loan of RM 22,100.00 has been granted by Mr. Kaya with repayment period 35 month’s installment. c. Mr. Pity want to do full settlement as he have a purchaser for the car but was told that the transfer of the car could not be done due to the registration number (KK 8888) is belong to a motorcycle (FR80). d. Mr. Pity had returned the car to Mr. Kaya and requested to refund the deposit of RM 9,900.00 and RM 17,192.00 for the amount of 28 month repayment from Mr. Kaya. e. Mr. Pity also claimed damages arising out of the expenses of hiring a car for his use and damages for anxiety caused as being blacklisted by financial institution.
In this case, Mr. Kaya had no good title to the BMW car No. KK 8888 when the hire purchase agreement was entered into on 19 March 1991 because it is not suits with Section 27 of the Sale of Goods Act 1957.
In Section 27 of Sale of Goods Act implies that if goods are bought from a person who is not the owner, and who does not sell them under his authority, the buyer does not acquire any title. This 'Nemo dat qoud non habet' (which means, no one can give a better title than he has himself) rule serves to protect the right of the owner.
As in the case of Ng Ngat Siang vs.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    PASS 2 UNIT 3 A

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sale of Goods act 1979 – All goods must meet the main three criteria. The goods must be as described, of satisfaction quality and fit for purpose. If the seller does not meet the criteria they are breaching the contract and the buyer will have to claim under the Sale of Good Act 1979…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legt2741 Week 4

    • 1192 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Section 9 (partners jointly liable for partnership contracts”: “Every partner in a firm other than an incorporated limited…

    • 1192 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have to pay especial attention to the agreement reached with the former Co-owner of the company, Mr. Verden. This agreement is affecting the cash flow of the company since the interest expenses raises by around $12,000.00 more per year, this together the financial interest of the Metropolitan’s Bank loan makes that the company needs a larger amount to finance its debts, that by the way regarding the agreement with Verden should not being paid by the company but by Jones personal income since this agreement was not reached between the company and Verden but between Verden and Jones. Furthermore, we are assuming that the company is paying this agreement since the Metropolitan’s interest rate if not will be of 12,45% per year which it seems to be very high for a bank of this kind. See Table 3…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referring to the Sale of Goods Act there are two types of contract. One of them is sale and the other one is agreement to sell. Sale is when the ownership of the goods transfers to the buyer at the time of sale. Agreement to sell is the transfer of ownership takes place some time after the contract is agreed. When sale happens the buyer has real rights which can be used against everyone that means full rights. But in the case of agreement to sell the buyer has only personal rights. It is good only against the seller.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Property Law 2 Notes

    • 9380 Words
    • 38 Pages

    | s 42 (1) – Key indefeasibility provisionThe registered proprietor’s title is not to be postponed against anyone (they are paramount from unregistered interests) * Paramount from unregistered interests * Subject to exceptions – i.e. previously registered interest in his land and frauds 40 (1) – Manual folio shall be conclusive that the person named in the folio as the registered proprietor is the registered proprietor of that estate or interest (evidence of title) * Not a major source of indefeasibility, but is designed to assist in relation to the proof of title * Should be read subject to the key indefeasibility section (s42)s 45 –Extension of protection: for registered proprietor who is a bona fide purchaser for value * this Act cannot be interpreted as to leave them open to a court action for recovery of damages or for ejectment or for the possession or recovery of land, on the ground that vendor may have been registered through fraud or error…

    • 9380 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Section 12 of the Act implies a term that the seller of the goods has title to those goods i.e. he owns them and/or has the authority to sell them. Once transferred the term also pledges that the buyer will take those goods free from any encumbrances and is entitled to enjoy ‘quiet possession’ of them. Section 12 incorporates into the contract a term that the seller either has legal title to the property to be sold or that he will have title at the time when property is to pass. Two warranties are additionally implied that the buyer will enjoy quiet possession of the goods and that the goods will be free from any encumbrances (such as sellers ' lien or a third party having lien over the goods).…

    • 2063 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    law case study

    • 2210 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The next night, at Buyer 's 18th birthday party, Buyer discussed the deal with Investor. After buying the van, Buyer planned to start a document courier service, and he had spent $1200 on business cards, flyers and a cellular phone. Buyer projected a profit of $50,000 in the first year. Investor was impressed with Buyer 's plans and agreed to loan Buyer $20,000 to buy the van.…

    • 2210 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Time Value of Money

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Gomez Electronics needs to arrange financing for its expansion program. Bank A offers to lend…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sales of Corvette

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ms Daughtery sent our client an offer note on February 13, 2008, selling her 1965 Corvette Stingray for the amount of 25,995 plus all title transfer fees. Approximately thirty days later our client Mr. deCapo sent Ms. Daughtery his acceptance of her terms for the sale of her vehicle with the additional cost for title transfer fees. Our client chose accept her terms, via a note on a napkin and sent in the mail.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    previous owner's bank had a lien on the tractor. Under the Sale of Goods Act, this is…

    • 1253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 6 JKL

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jack, Kenny and Lenny were partners in JKL Wedding Bridal Gallery (JKL) since three (3) years ago, having their business in Serdang Raya. To expand their business, Kenny, the managing partner ordered a brand new of 30 pair of bridal clothes and accessories worth RM80,000-00 from Jai Pong Brides Couture. Kenny had been financially assisted from Bank Berniaga Berhad (BBB) under the business name. The lending transaction was not disclosed to the other partners. In fact, Kenny was fully in charge of JKL’s financial aspects.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coveyancing

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. The open contract that was entered into is a bare agreement and the rights and obligations of them hereinafter referred to as “the Purchaser” and Diego Suarez hereinafter referred to as “the Vendor” is regulated by case law, statute and conventional conveyance practices.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law of Malaysia

    • 5007 Words
    • 21 Pages

    In the Phing case, she is unable to pay for luxury car Audi R8 which is already delivered to her. Under the Sale of Goods Act (1979) Phing is against the section 32 of the Act goes on to say that unless…

    • 5007 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LPL 4802 ASSIGNMENT 5 Final

    • 3251 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In accordance with the scenario in question, different contractual agreements were established. The first agreement was between Alberton Motors and Easy Car Dealers concluded in Polokwane on 28 December 2013 to purchase a gold Mercedes Benz 2012-model for R820 000. “In terms of the agreement Alberton Motors would pay the purchase price before date of delivery and it…

    • 3251 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eraser

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    That I JOSEPH M. EUGENIO, of legal age, Filipino and residence and postal address at Km. 39 Gulod Pulong Buhangin, Sta. Maria Bulacan for and in consideration of the amount of THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND PESOS ONLY (35,000.00) Philippine Currency, and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged from JOSELITO ALCANTARA, of legal age, Filipino and with residence and postal address at Pulong Buhangin, Sta. Maria Bulacan hereby SELL, TRANSFER AND CONVEYS and by these present have SOLD, TRANSFERRED AND CONVEYED unto said JOSELITO ALCANTARA, the following motor vehicle as follow:…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics