Preview

Legal 100 Quiz 2

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1039 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal 100 Quiz 2
Question 1
0 out of 5 points
Incorrect
Robert had a dispute with his neighbor regarding the location of the property line. Robert’s attorney suggests to Robert that both parties contribute funds toward hiring individuals to serve on a nonbinding jury and render a suggested verdict. Which of the following is the appropriate term for that type of procedure?
Answer
Selected Answer:
Private jury trial
Correct Answer:
Summary jury trial
Question 2
5 out of 5 points
Correct
The doctrine of stare decisis means
Answer
Selected Answer: to abide by decided cases
Correct Answer: to abide by decided cases
Question 3
5 out of 5 points
Correct
A lawsuit may be resolved before trial by the judge granting a[n]
Answer
Selected Answer: motion to dismiss
Correct Answer: motion to dismiss
Question 4
5 out of 5 points
Correct
Most states have ________ statutes, which can subject an out-of-state defendant to jurisdiction within the state.
Answer
Selected Answer: long-arm Correct Answer: long-arm Question 5
5 out of 5 points
Correct
Which of the following was the result at the U.S. Supreme Court level in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, the case in the text involving the issue of whether the plaintiffs could proceed with a class action against Wal-Mart alleging sex discrimination?
Answer
Selected Answer:
That a class action was inappropriate because the plaintiffs had failed to show that the company operated under a general policy of discrimination.
Correct Answer:
That a class action was inappropriate because the plaintiffs had failed to show that the company operated under a general policy of discrimination.
Question 6
5 out of 5 points
Correct
Case law, the legal rules made by judges when they decide a case where no constitution, statute or regulation exists to resolve the dispute, is known as ________.
Answer
Selected Answer:
Common law
Correct Answer:
Common law
Question 7
5 out of 5

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Employees of General Motors (GM) sued GM for refusing to sponsor a Christian employee affinity group. GM’s policy was to not sponsor any religion based affinity groups. GM was successful in defending against the lawsuit because it upheld its policy not to sponsor any religious affinity groups.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Final Exam

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages

    6) Which of the following forms of alternative dispute resolution allows both parties to see the strengths and weaknesses of both sides of the case through the presentation of evidence?…

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. A business fails to meet the criteria if its practices are not equal and if has procedures unrelated to necessary job functions in the organization. In the case of McDonnell Douglas vs Green the Supreme Court holds that a charging party can prove unlawful discrimination indirectly by showing a failure in the organizational business process. In this case the hiring and firing of an employee, McDonnell Douglas was taken to court over their unethical tactics. The charging party has to only prove four things: they are a minority (protected group), they applied and were qualified for the position, the job was not offered to them, and the employer continued to seek applicants with similar qualifications. If the plaintiff can prove these four elements, the employer must show a legitimate lawful reason why the person was not hired.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Dunlap VS Tennessee Valley Authority, the legal issue that was presented was discrimination, disparate treatment and disparate impact. According to the EEOC, race discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because he/she is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race (such as hair texture, skin color, or certain facial features). Color discrimination involves treating someone unfavorably because of skin color complexion. The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers from discrimination, and when it comes to the case, discrimination was seen in many ways.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Vaughn Case Brief

    • 3486 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Plaintiff-Appellant Emma S. Vaughn contests the judgment rendered in favor of defendant Texaco, Inc., dismissing with prejudice Vaughn's race and sex discrimination suit filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. Because the magistrate clearly erred in finding no racial discrimination, we reverse.…

    • 3486 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employers must understand that the persons who evaluate and decide the outcome of employment discrimination cases (the EEOC investigator, federal or state judge, and/or jury) have keen senses of fairness and expect that employees will be treated in a fair manner. As a result, employers are exposed to substantial liability for any acts, including perceived acts, of discrimination in the workplace. Employers should take any charge of discrimination seriously and the employer must keep in mind that, at a minimum, it needs to have a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for taking the action in question. In addition, an employer's response will be evaluated by persons who have a different perspective than the employer. What…

    • 964 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great Society Dbq

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    32) a & b) The approach to bring discrimination cases before the courts that I would have disagreed with most would have been using violence to gain attention. This approach only caused an uproar that required law enforcement and resulted in injuries of many people. Although it did bring attention, it brought…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eeoc Paper

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The EEOC’s role in the lawsuit was to find out whether or not the claim was valid. Once they decided that the claim was valid, they tried…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analysis. The court found for the Civil Rights Act stating that Ledbetter should have filed suit against Goodyear when the rejection of pay decision occurred. Since 180 days had elapsed the suit violated the statute of limitations for discriminatory…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * A class-action lawsuit and the threat of more litigation accusing management of hiding problems…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it clear to you why a court would be able to include in its remedies those who were not directly discriminated against by any employer?…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An employee is refused e.g. training or lost a job, because of their beliefs, race or sexuality…

    • 2120 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence and Points

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment? (3 points)…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years, the English legal system has followed the doctrine of precedent and concreted itself by the rules of stare decisis. Courts were taught to follow previous judgments, in other words “to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed.” However, over centuries, principles and decisions set and made by judges were refined, confined, and distinguished. Such decisions came about because judges in later cases felt the need to make amendments, due to specific reasons under crucial circumstances.…

    • 2425 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The court reversed the intermediate court's judgment and reinstated the administrative law judge's decision that respondent was terminated for racial reasons. The intermediate court erred by rejecting the permissive inference of intentional discrimination as insufficient where the fact finder found the proffered reasons to be a pretext…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays