Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Law and Order

Powerful Essays
1269 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law and Order
POLS 1101
2/4/13

The fact of keeping law and order when it comes to terrorism is a very important, but very looked over issue. Terrorism has been around since the first attack in 1920. Most of the attacks on the United States has happened in New York. The most famous and well remembered is the attack on September 11, 2001, hijackers crashed 2 commercial jets into twin towers of World Trade Center; 2 more hijacked jets were crashed into the Pentagon and a field in rural Pa. Total dead and missing numbered 2,992, 2,749 in New York City, 184 at the Pentagon, 40 in Pa., and 19 hijackers. The Al Qaeda terrorist group was blamed and held responsible for the attack. Osama Bin Laden was the leader of this terrorist group and was ultimately punished for what he did. In 2011 Osama Bin Laden was hiding in a bunker, which was raided by an elite team of Navy Seals and shot down. This brave and heroic attack ultimately ended, or so we thought the war on terrorism. The fact of the matter is we will always have that fear of terrorists attacking huge events in the U.S. We can rest assured knowing that the FBI is risking their lives day and night protecting against another attack while we carry on with our busy, sometimes meaningless lives.
In protecting us there is a certain order that must remain in the fight. If ever it gets out of control the president can declare a national state of emergency. With this declaration comes martial law. Martial law is defined as, temporary rule by military authorities, imposed on a civilian population especially in time of war or when civil authority has broken down. Martial law has only been used on the national level once and on the regional level once in the United States.
It was used on the national level during the Civil War and on the regional level during World War 2. Martial law can be declared on the national level by Congress or the president. Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 15, of the Constitution, Congress has the power "to provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel Invasions (Lowi, A16).” Article II, Section 2, Clause 1, of the Constitution declares that "the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States (Lowi, A19)." Congress has never declared martial law. However, at the outset of the Civil War, in July 1861, Congress ratified most of the martial law measures declared by President Abraham Lincoln. Its martial law declaration gave the Union military forces the authority to arrest persons and conduct trials. In the movie, The Siege, we saw that it wasn’t the president that was Commander in Chief of the Army.
Martial law is very concerning to citizens everywhere. As in the movie innocent people were tortured, put in fences like caged animals, and had every single right they were ever entitled stripped away from them like they never even existed. In history at least one governor we know has used martial law to enforce state agency regulations. In 1931 Governor Ross S. Sterling, of Texas, sent Texas National troops into east Texas oil fields to force compliance with limits on the production of oil and an increase in the minimum number of acres required between oil wells. Martial law usually is used to try to restore and maintain peace during civil unrest. It does not always yield the desired results. In May 1970, for example, Ohio governor James Rhodes declared limited martial law by sending in National Guard troops to contain a Kent State University protest against the Vietnam War. Four protestors were shot and killed by the troops. In a case brought by their survivors, the Supreme Court held that the governor and other state officials could be sued if they acted beyond the scope of state laws and the federal Constitution. The book really doesn’t speak much on terrorism and keeping law and order, but I as a registered voter of the United States of America believe that in dire situations when there is civil unrest and the FBI and CIA cannot keep it under control the military should become involved. The only problem I have with this is the fact of innocent people dying and being tortured. Can we not torture everyone just because they fit into a certain group you may be looking through to find the certain person or persons that have been causing the unrest and catastrophes? It is a last resort only for martial law and should remain a last resort. A lot of times things get out of hand before they get better, so the suggestion is to give it a little time to work it out. Of course that then brings up the question of how much time is enough. It also brings up the question of what if things don’t get better. The point of knowing if things will not get better should at that point and time incorporate martial law into the POT or plan of attack. Never take for granted your safety or the life that you live. Someplace somewhere there are men and women are laying down their lives for you every single day. We must not only remember them but also we need to remember their families and what they have to go through day in and day out being without their family member. If you take what you have for granted I challenge you to try and live in their world for a week. I guarantee you’ll be a hell of a lot more appreciative of what you have in your life. Take time out of your day and just say thank you to a veteran. I bet it’ll make his day and you’ll more than likely get a smile after seeing their face light up. They’ll definitely know someone cares about them and what they’re doing for us. To finish off my thoughts on keeping law and order in terrorism I must say history has shown that our military and economic power can thwart Saddam. But in the early 1990's we let him off the hook in deference to misguided notions of stability. We saw that kind of stability in action on September 11. As long as Hussein is around, building weapons whose sole purpose is to incite global destabilization, the world can never be safe and the war on terrorism can never be won. Bin Laden and the Taliban make a nice showpiece of what U.S power coupled with resolve can do. But the Afghan war will be a hollow victory if we will fail to take the next logical step. President Obama must go all the way to Baghdad, where he will find the head of the snake. And when he finds the snake, he must not let it strike again. So once again only use martial law in dire situations if needed, if not just forget about it.

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001454.html#ixzz2KGZc0bPp http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/martial+law Lowi, Theodore. Ginsberg, Benjamin. Shepsle, Kenneth. Ansolabehere, Stephen,, 1990,. American Government Power and Purpose. New York, New York: W.W Norton and Company Inc.

http://www.un.org/law/cod/finterr.htm

I have abided by the Catawba College Honor Code during the preparation of this paper.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The United States code described that militias are always subject to federal, state or local government control. It also described a “private” militia or army not under government control could be considered illegal and in rebellion, and as a result is subject to harsh punishment.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A natural disaster places an immense amount of strain on our civilian population as well as the political leaders who are responsible for their state’s overall well-being. Hurricane Katrina was a perfect example of how bad a natural disaster can affect a single state. Louisiana was in a state of emergency and the state elected officials held all the power to assist in the palm of their hands. At the time of this state’s crises, Governor Kathleen Blanco was charged with this responsibility. Each state’s governor has the authority to enact Posse Comitatus. Whenever they feel that their state is in an unruly state and Marshall Law is needed. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 outlines the right of states, which can affect the wellbeing of citizens.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the War Powers Resolution, the Commander in Chief can only send American personnel abroad to take military action against another country only with a declaration of war from Congress. However, according to “statutory authority” or in the case of an attack on the United States, the president reserves the right to take action against a sovereign country, given that the president has issued a forty-eight hour notice to Congress, and the personnel remain active for no longer than sixty days. This important resolution severely limits the power of the Commander in Chief, and lays within the system of checks of balances which is vitally integral to the United States government.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The importance of orders to the military become clearer when it is taken into account that Article 15 punishments are administered without a jury or judge. The military recognizes that respect for authority is what maintains order and prevents the eruption of chaos and is hence willing to set an example for all who might be tempted to oppose their leaders, by administering these punishments first hand without any judicial representatives. Furthermore, article 90 makes it clearly illegal to disobey an order by a military officer. The extent to which obedience is safeguarded through strict laws and intolerance of disobedience or disrespectful behavior, underlines…

    • 3006 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many changes have been made within the United States criminal justice system in an effort to combat terrorism more effectively however; many would argue that some of the changes are useless and racist. In many ways they are, but since the September 11, 2001 attacks, there was no other choice. For many years after, America was right on top of every suspicious person and or act. With the development of Homeland Security, and help from the Government, it was nearly impossible for an attack to occur. This did not mean that the war on terrorism was over by any means. Many terrorist tried yet failed to conduct such attacks against America and other countries, but they…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president is named by the Constitution as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, giving him an incredibly powerful position in times of war. The Framers worried that the president's wartime role was too powerful, in fact, and thus gave Congress a powerful set of checks and balances on the president's war powers. Only Congress, not the president, has the power to declare war. Perhaps even more important, only Congress has the power to pay for wartime expenses. That means that if the president tries to launch an ill-advised military escapade, Congress can effectively pull the plug, forcing the president to bring his troops home by refusing to fund their continued deployment. This is considered effective as it means that the president has to involve congress to gain representation of the country before making big decisions. However, the president has exploited his role as commander in chief to effectively take over Congress’s power to declare war. For example, President Bush gave congress false intelligence in order for them to authorise the War on Terror, an international military campaign which included the war in Afghanistan launched in 2001 and the war in Iraq launched in 2003.…

    • 597 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In times of war, laws are silent. Throughout every war there are legal issues that are brought to the table. These issues decide the fate of our country. The government must act fast to protect its citizens. Inter arma silent leges may seem unconstitutional but we deem it necessary because in the end, it comes to our benefit. Laws should be silent in times of war because it saved our union from falling apart, it allowed America to receive vital information, and allowed the united nations to win World War Two.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlawful Arrest

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This study will examine the shift in its implementation in the United States from 1863-2015. And how its change has conspired against civilian life. People have failed to recognize how its declaration can affect civilization, leading to the increase in unlawful detainment of citizens and non-citizens. Yet even so has made considerable contributions to settle disputes. Its regime has reconstructed the use of authority in society in addition alleviate complications in time of distress. Its implication can be based off existing exploitations and can undergo a change at any time. If we continue to believe that martial law efforts only improve social functions, we’ll never fully understand the larger question of how it its declaration has impacted the rise in an unlawful arrest of citizens in the United states from…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to understand rights and liberties during wartime situations, some background information needs to be addressed and explained. This paper will explain the definition of habeas corpus and the role of the Judicial, Legislative and Executive Branches of government during wartime and conflicts, how the President will sometimes take matter into his own hands.…

    • 2011 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Power to Declare War

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Congress and the president use their powers to check and balance each other. One power of Congress is the ability to declare war. However, Congress generally gives the president control during war time. Because of this, the president is able to acquire more power over the war while Congress can do little if they have already given their approval. After the Vietnam War, in which Presidents Johnson and Nixon continued to wage despite a divided Congress[i]; they decided that the Constitution did not warrant the president to have the power to declare war, so they passed the War Powers Resolution[ii]. While the War Powers Act was meant to explicitly limit presidential war powers, it is largely ignored by the president, who holds the power to send troops into combat.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper examines the measures and initiatives taken by local law enforcement organizations in the U.S. in response to increased terrorist attacks. It analyzes, and interprets information obtained from the studies conducted by other academic scholars on this topic, in addition to information sourced from the resources of a number of law enforcement organizations operating at the local level in the United States. This research established that the initiatives and measures taken by local law enforcement agencies in the U.S. have been largely successful, but some of them are inappropriate and need to be abandoned or improved because they result in harm to some innocent groups of people in American society.…

    • 3056 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Homeland Security Threats

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because of this, the organization of Homeland Security was created to protect the safety of the American people and its soil. Since then Homeland had held the perpetrators accountable and has worked to prevent the recurrence of similar atrocities on any scale whether abroad or at home. “The War on Terror extends beyond the current armed conflict that arose out of the attacks of September 11, 2001, and embraces all facets of continuing U.S. efforts to bring an end to the scourge of terrorism.” (The White House) There have been may success due to the relentless actions of DHS: “They have deprived al-Qaida of safe haven in Afghanistan and helped a democratic government to rise in its place. Once a terrorist sanctuary ruled by the repressive Taliban regime, Afghanistan is now a full partner in the War on Terror.” (The White House) There has been “a multinational coalition joined by the Iraqis, which is aggressively prosecuting the war against the terrorists in Iraq and have strengthened the ability of the United States to disrupt and help prevent future attacks in the Homeland by enhancing counterterrorism architecture through the creation of the Department of Homeland.” (The White House) Yet, we are still not sate, we still continue to face terrorist attacks and challenges. “Terrorist networks today are more dispersed and less centralized. They are more reliant on smaller cells inspired by a common ideology and less directed by a central command structure.” (The White House) Although, the United Sates has considerately improved the economy such as; air, land, sea, and border security, Homeland is not immune from attack. “Terrorists have declared their intention to acquire and use weapons of mass destruction (WMD) to inflict even more catastrophic attacks against the United States, our allies, partners, and other interests around the world.” (The White…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First thing is National Security. The government is always a wanting to protect our country and everyone in it. With all the terrorist groups today, our countries government is going to want to do everything that they can to protect the country from attacks. The terrorist groups today are growing in numbers every single day, and it is only getting worse. Every day as people are watching…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    syrian conflict

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Security Vs Privacy

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1776, America’s founding fathers made it clear the primary and constitutional responsibility of the United States government was to provide safety for its citizens. In addition, it became the American government’s duty to protect its constituents against any threat of terrorism. This role is not taken lightly in the United States, due to the fact that Americans value the security and safety of their country. However, there are others who believe civil liberties are much more valuable than their safety. Ever since September 11th and the bombings during the Boston Marathon the nation has realized that they are not immune to the threats of terrorists around the world. As a result, this has triggered…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics