Braddon establishes this conflicting identity through the symbolism of the pre-Raphaelite portrait of Lady Audley. The angelic imagery Braddon achieves through depiction of “feathery masses of ringlets with every glimmer of gold” and “delicate face as to give a lurid lightness to the blonde complexion” is one of beauty that subscribes perfectly to the passive and diminutive Victorian ideal of a woman. Moreover, the use of “gold” emphasises the value placed on the features that contribute to the fulfilment of this idea. Yet, there is an ominous duality to the portrait; something “sinister” captured by the artist. Braddon’s choice of language alludes to a threat, positioning Victorian readers to consider that Lady Audley is not all that she seems, and that the very standards of Victorian womanhood can literally mask ominous intentions. Moreover, as the depiction progresses, this masked deviance emerges overtly through the hellfire imagery of the crimson dress that “hung about her in folds that looked like flames”. It therefore becomes ironic that Lady Audley can conform to the roles of both the villain and the innocent ideal woman, thus linking madness with power in the image of a
Braddon establishes this conflicting identity through the symbolism of the pre-Raphaelite portrait of Lady Audley. The angelic imagery Braddon achieves through depiction of “feathery masses of ringlets with every glimmer of gold” and “delicate face as to give a lurid lightness to the blonde complexion” is one of beauty that subscribes perfectly to the passive and diminutive Victorian ideal of a woman. Moreover, the use of “gold” emphasises the value placed on the features that contribute to the fulfilment of this idea. Yet, there is an ominous duality to the portrait; something “sinister” captured by the artist. Braddon’s choice of language alludes to a threat, positioning Victorian readers to consider that Lady Audley is not all that she seems, and that the very standards of Victorian womanhood can literally mask ominous intentions. Moreover, as the depiction progresses, this masked deviance emerges overtly through the hellfire imagery of the crimson dress that “hung about her in folds that looked like flames”. It therefore becomes ironic that Lady Audley can conform to the roles of both the villain and the innocent ideal woman, thus linking madness with power in the image of a