Preview

Knights Vs Samurai Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Knights Vs Samurai Essay
When you think of a warrior, which do you think of more, a knight or a samurai? You might be thinking that they are both basically the same, but you are wrong. They may seem similar, but they really have quite a few differences. Three things that are comparable between the two are weapons and armor, religious beliefs, and views on women. These are three important facts about the two.

Even though they exist for the same purpose, the weapons and armor are actually very different between knights and samurai. For example, the samurai's armor were metal plates that were both bendable for them to move, and strong enough to block attacks. The samurai also has a horrific mask that they use to look menacing in the face of their enemy. With the mask the samurai are allowed to traumatize their enemy so they can attack them with a couple extra seconds to spare. They also have a kimono under their armor. The knight’s armor on the other hand are not the same, it covers more of the body because they are not plates like the samurai. The knights armor is different because they don’t have that menacing mask like the samurai, their helmets were
…show more content…
Knights and samurai each had their own way of treating women. One example is that the knights treated women with the respect they rightfully deserve. They do this because of their code of chivalry which is putting the acts of ladies in front of your own. If you were a woman married to a knight, you would have a lovely gentlemen that respects you like a person. The only downside to this is that you will not have the freedom to be a knight if you wanted to. However, for the samurai, women were allowed to become these warriors and fight for their shogun. Of course, there is a catch, if you were a woman married to a samurai, you would tend to the need of every man in the house. So either way, women don’t get

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Knights Vs Samurai Dbq

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first way that samurais have an advantage is by their armor. In document D written by Terry Bennett it says “ A knight’s armor could weigh 40 to 60 pounds.” This made it harder for the to be able to move around in. The weight would slow the knights down. This gave the samurai’s an advantage to be able to hurt the enemies way faster. Another piece of evidence that supports the claim is in Document D written by Terry Bennett it says how the samurai’s did not wear armor on their right arm so that they could easily draw their bow. This helped them out because if someone was coming at him unexpectedly they would have the time to draw their bow. Since they didn’t have armor on their right arm they would be able to draw it faster and attack back. Therefore, others may think it is an disadvantage but it is not due to how quickly the samurai would be able to pull out the bow and defend their self. This would be one out of so many reasons why the samurai would beat the knights in a battle.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai Dbq Analysis

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think that the Samurai would win in a battle against a knight. While knights ad samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the Samurai and this can be seen in weapons, training, and their honor code…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feudalism started in both Japan and Europe at the same time, but does that mean that samurai and knights are the same? Feudalism is when the knight/samurai provide service for the lord, and in exchange, the lord provides land for the knight/samurai. Samurai and Knights: were the similarity greater than the differences? Samurai and knights were more similar than different in 3 broad areas; social position, training and armor, and honor and death.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai didn’t wear armor or any protection on their right arm so they could easily draw their bow without any trouble(Document C). This made it easier for them to kill a knight or anyone who they were in conflict with. This was also very dangerous because, their arm would be vulnerable to anything that it came in contact with which then you would have one less arm. Their armor created a “shell” that provided both mobility and protection(Document C). A knight’s armor was really heavy to move as quickly, but they were very well protected from anything. This “Shell” like armor that the samurai wore made it easier to move and they were also protected. For these reasons that even though a samurai has good protection and great mobility, doesn’t mean he couldn’t…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    However, from the earliest days, armor almost always had more than one layer. The first layer would be a pair of loose breaches (see picture on next page) and a shirt. Over the breeches the knight would wear hose, which were like two separate tight-fitting trouser legs. Over his hose, a 12 th-century knight wore mail leggings, called chausses. Next, to cushion his armor, he would put on a padded coat called a gambeson. On top of this would be a tunic (kind of like a robe), which was very long and used as a mark of wealth and status. The knight’s armor consisted of chain mail-sheets of interlocking iron rings-mostly worn over some sort of quilted padding that absorbed the shock of a blow. As his main piece of armor, the chain mail shirt was called a hauberk, which usually had a chain mail hood called a coif. The hauberk was really weird because over this the knight would wear a short surcoat known as gipons, where it would really hard to wear in the summer because it would get very, very hot. The knight also had a helmet, called a bastinet, to protect his head, and a wooden shield. He was armed with a heavy sword that was used for cutting mainly, and not stabbing. Some were equipped with long lances, like those long sword like weapons that would be seen in tournaments where two knights would charge at each other while on horses. In the 14 th-century, the lower…

    • 3342 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On Samurai Rising

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Written by Pamela Turner and illustrated by Gareth Hinds, Samurai Rising is a biography on the fascinating life of Minamoto Yoshitsune, one of the most well known samurais in Japan. Yoshitsune was a member of the Minamoto family, who were defeated by their main rival, the Taira family, when he was still just an infant. Most of the adult Minamoto were killed, while their children were sent to live in exile in various parts of Japan. Little is known about Yoshitsune’s early childhood, but there are many accounts on the battles that he led against the once victorious Taira. The personalities of the characters, and the relationships between them, though, are what stood out to me the most in this book.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The samurai (or bushi) were the soldiers of premodern Japan. They later created up the ruling military category that eventually became the best ranking social caste of the Edo amount (1603-1867). Samurai used a variety of weapons like bows and arrows, spears and guns, however their main weapon and image was the arm.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Samurai Knights Dbq

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever wondered what the similarities and the differences were between the Samurai and knights? Samurai and knights were very strong warriors in the medieval era, they had different cultural ideas, but Samurai and Knight also had similarities. Samurai and Knights were similar, but also different in some areas. The similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at three areas, social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Samurai and Knights were different but the similarities were greater because of their rankings, training, armor, fighting technique, code of honor, and death viewpoint. The Japanese called their warriors Samurai, and the Europeans called their warriors Knights. They both swore oaths of loyalty to noble lords and fought to the death to defend them. This happened at the same time even though Japan and Europe were thousands of miles apart.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tokugawa era Japan was a very different period than those before it, instead of proving loyalty and honor on the battlefield it was drawn from more diplomatic situations. The Tokugawa period brought with it an era of lasting peace for nearly 250 years, and with it came different ways in which to occupy ones self. Many things in society changed including, the warring ways of the samurai where honor was drawn from the strength and skill turned into peaceful times when martial skill was practiced to maintain. However, besides the peaceful times many things remained the same about the Japanese social structure. Men and women still were very aware of honorable behavior, which held the basis for social culture. Although some similarities between the two were apparent, the more interesting seem to be the ways in which women were observed to display honorable behavior. The seemingly confined life of a women was very basic yet very strict in conduct. While men presented the strength of the household outside women held up the integrity of the house from within.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Body Paragraph#1: Both the Europeans and the Japanese had successful warriors that helped them succeed. In both feudal Japan and Europe, constant warfare made warriors the most important class. Called the “Knights” in Europe and “Samurai” in Japan, the warriors served their local lords. In both cases, Knight and Samurais were bound by a code of ethics. Knights were supposed to agree to the concept of Chivalry, while the Samurai were bound by the Bushido, or “The way of the warrior.” Both Knight and Samurai rode horses into battles, used swords, and wore armor. The European armor, which was worn by the knights, was usually all metal, made of chain, or plate metal. Japanese…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It consisted of the knight being loyal to their church and lord as well as being honest.(STEWE-2)They were also expected to treat women with respect and perform acts of gallantry. Much of their code of behavior still exists today in the way that men should treat women. (SIP-B)Another part of a knight’s daily life was his participation in jousting tournaments. (STEWE-1)Jousting was done with two knight’s both armed with lances. They were on horseback as they rode toward each other with their lances held straight out. They would try to knock each other off their horses. Who ever could do this would be the winner.(STEWE-2)When the knight’s were jousting for exercise or battle they had to wear heavy suits of armor. The armor they wore changed over time. In the 11th century it was made of linked metal rings and 300 years later they wore plated armor (CS)Becoming a knight meant you had to live your life a certain way by following a code of behavior and preparing yourself for…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this first paragraph I will be focusing how I believe the samurai's armor better prepares him for battle than the knight's armor. the samurai wear a mask to strike fear into their opponents to find an opening to attack. The knight's mask prevent heavy attacks and fatal blows by cushioning the attack to lessen the impact. The samurai’s armor was less protective but it gave them more flexibility to move around and use martial arts with the armor on. While the knights armor focused more on protecting them then flexibility, so the knight's armor did limit the movements they can make. So overall the samurai's armor is more focused on flexibility to allow them to not have limits on movement whilst the knights armor is focused on protection which does limit their movements because of the weight. So that is why I think the samurai armor is better in my opinion.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The First Knight Essay

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A. Introduction: Write an introduction that introduces the themes of courtly love and chivalry; also,…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all, they were both used for the same purpose (to protect their Lord or Daimyo). They also were paid with land and peasants to farm that land. Although these two facts are true, there are many more reasons on why the empires were different then why they were the same. For example, some facts are, these two empires were around 5100 miles apart which at the time was nearly the whole discovered world. The Knights were better prepared and took longer to train the Samurai, who armorwise were not very beetle prepped. In document C, it says how much time each warrior takes to train. It states, “At about age 14 the trainees officially became samurai in a ceremony called genpuku” (Doc C). It also states in document C, “If a squire [gained approval from] an examining knight, he would usually [become] a knight at around the age of 21” (Doc C). These two statements are saying that usually a Samurai trainee would become a Samurai at around age 14 when a Squire would become a knight around 21 years…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays