Preview

King Richard Iii and Looking for Richard

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1605 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Richard Iii and Looking for Richard
Essay 1 – King Richard III and Looking for Richard
How has your study of the connections between King Richard III and Looking for Richard deepened your understanding of the context of and values within, each text?
William Shakespeare’s play King Richard III and Al Pacino’s docu-drama Looking for Richard have enriched my understanding of how context shapes the values inscribed within each text. In light of this, the connection that exists between the two texts is: how the central character of the texts embodies the values of theatricality and language in order to attain their own perception of power as shaped by their respective contexts. Whereas Richard III relentlessly pursues political power in the context of a late 16th century Shakespearean play, Pacino embarks on his desire to enhance and exert his cultural power in a late 20th century America through a hybrid, postmodern rendition of Shakespeare’s play.
In the opening soliloquy if King Richard III, the audience is introduced to and captivated by the actor Richard, an antagonist who wields his skills of theatricality and language to strengthen his villainous intentions of marching towards political power: the throne of England. In his Elizabethan context, Shakespeare was the leading figure in the entertainment world, a man who recognised the value of theatre to entertain and educate. He was aware that his audience were well acquainted with the Tudor myths and conventions of theatre and thus, it was within his interests to draw a well-considered line between being artistic and politically astute. In doing so, he allowed Richard III to embody the tension that existed between the more conservative, divinely sanctioned principals of God with elements of emerging Renaissance humanism that suggested an individual could actively engage in self fashioning their own destiny. This would allow Richard III to “clothe his naked villainy” and in turn, foster a charismatic connection that would see him confiding and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare’s, King Richard III, and Al Pacino’s film, Looking for Richard, conversely explores key ideas and values portrayed in both texts. The comparison accentuates the deep similarity of ideas and values, which drive the two texts. Villainy and power in King Richard III highlights the values of moderation and stability of the Renaissance age. Similarly, Al Pacino examines these same ideas to emphasise the values of creativity and artistic integrity. Examining how each composer relies on an exaggerated and heightened characterisation of Richard…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    An examination of the impacts in texts reveals that whilst these concerns may reflect universal human weaknesses, the treatment of these issues in Shakespeare’s historical play King Richard III and Al Pacino’s Looking For Richard, reveals the eternal role that context plays in the presentation of these themes. Shakespeare examines the moral ramifications of the relentless pursuit of power, which reflects the politically unstable period of the 16th century from which he wrote. However, Pacino reappropriates Shakespeare’s depiction of power and deception for his contemporary audience to explicate the enduring nature of these concerns.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hsc essay 33

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard III- Richard, himself is very aware of the gap between his outwards reality and inward reality. As a consequence he carefully constructs his façade while fully acknowledging his Machiavellian motivations to the audience in his asides.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Richard III and Looking For Richard directly relate to historical and social contexts respectively, social drawing on historical’s challenge to the context in which it was written. Shakespeare’s play was crafted in a difficult time of political and religious adherence. Shakespeare’s portrayal of Richard focuses on his devilish and Machiavellian nature. Machiavelli’s The Prince teaches that an adept ruler should aim to achieve power at any cost. Richard is a Machiavel; he calls himself a devil, ‘Thus like the formal Vice, Iniquity, I moralise two meanings in one word.’…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard III is an historical play written by William Shakespeare during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, depicting the contentious rise to power of King Richard III of England and his short reign as King. Richard III is the final play in a cycle of eight plays written by Shakespeare dramatizing English history from 1398 to 1485. The theme of villainy is intricately explored throughout the play as one of its main themes. Shakespeare effectively explores the theme of villainy through the use of dramatic techniques such as character soliloquies and literary techniques such as symbolism. These techniques enable Shakespeare’s ideas of villainy to be developed and explored, which…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Deposition of Richard II, it is obvious that the English king was disliked by all. A list of his grievances was drawn up, citing all of his poor choices as king and the reasons why he should be dethroned. The number one cause of the hatred of him was “his evil rule, that is, he has given the goods and possession…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like many writers, Shakespeare’s purpose of writing was driven by the context and audiences of his times. Based on the political situation of Queen Elizabeth I, who had progressively enlarged her power at the expense of the…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Al Pacino’s Looking for Richard and Shakespeare’s King Richard III, there are many similarities between both texts. This can be seen through values such as the importance of integrity as well as trust. However, it is only to a certain extent that both texts portray these similar values. Throughout Al Pacino’s modern remake of Looking for Richard, many modern cinematic techniques such as the specific use of colours, rearrangement of the original text as well as comparisons made in commentary are heavily included. Instead of using such visual, modern techniques, Shakespeare uses much literary techniques in order to convey the importance of certain values. It is through the different methods taken to convey the importance of such values that it can be said that it is only to a certain extent that similarities are more revealing than differences.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In spite of the fact that the plot evokes the implication that it occurred between the close of 16th century and the start of the 17th century, Shakespeare’s Hamlet surpasses the constraints of time and muses upon both the primitive and contemporary man. In the late 16th century in England, people of all classes on the social echelon, with the exception of royals, were able to publicly eyewitness theatre. Audiences craved new plays to assuage their appetites. One of numerous dramatists that capitalized this abundance of opportunity was Shakespeare. Opposed to the modern time, audiences spectated the play to hear it rather than see it. The articulation of the lines and significance of how the story was recited was crucial…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Shakespeare’s works are not limited to expressing the concerns and interests of a narrowly confined historical period. They have in them the…

    • 3051 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Doty, Jeffrey S. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, “Popularity,” and the Early Modern Public Sphere.” Shakespeare Quarterly 61.2 (Summer 2010): 185-205. Project MUSE. Web. 09 Sept. 2010.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richard III challenges notions of how history is created and presented. Shakespeare’s play depicts the infamous Richard not only at odds with the other characters, but also fighting for a different interpretation of history. Richard and Margaret function as two characters opposed to each other with regard to history; Richard attempts to cover up the past as Margaret attempts to expose it. However, the creation and acceptance of history is largely predicated on more common figures. In particular the scrivener, a seemingly small side character, becomes an integral figure who creates the documentation of history, cementing the written version as a truth. The scrivener, tasked with the duty to write the documents falsely indicting Hastings at Richard’s request, approaches the audience in Act III, scene 6 and laments his position of falsely creating a legal document construed as truth, and manifests the complicated truth of history. The scrivener’s position as a figure entrusted with written truth is observantly figured against both Richard’s approach to history through his language and the play as a whole–a text figured with propagandistic interests with the Tudor line. The scrivener’s scene, with its focus of documented history, exposes Richard’s verbal tricks and the play’s reliability as a historical document. While critics including Paige Martin Reynolds and Linda Charnes have identified both Richard and Margaret of Anjou as figures who engage with and distort history, lesser characters serve similar vital functions. Overall, Charnes and Reynolds contribute much to the conversation of history within the text and are essential to this particular reading, yet the level that the scrivener as a character works on contributes to the social and formal designs of the history play is not addressed in their essays. Reynolds, in her essay “mourning and Memory in Richard III,” addresses the role of historical construction in…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays