Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

King George III Tyranny?

Good Essays
851 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King George III Tyranny?
King George III, was the symbol of English Tyranny to the American Colonist. The colonist blamed him for all his usurpations and faults. They failed to see the truth. He was just an image to blame, behind all his actions was the Parliament. The Parliament dominates this Monarchy, not King George III. In addition, Americans condemned him for unjust laws, but in reality, these laws were fair and reasonable. In the American Colonies, colonist accused the kings for unjust laws and treatment. The Sugar Act, Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, and Intolerable Acts were seen as an obstruction against American Colonist’s freedom and rights. In 1764, the Parliament passed the Sugar Act to raise the tax revenue for England and increase the duty on foreign sugar imported from the West Indies. Sugar is a luxury not a necessity, but colonist refused to see this. The Sugar Act was only passed because Britain needed to recoup money that defended the colonist during the Seven Years’ War. Also, because of this war, Britain had a huge debt. American Colonist were stubborn and oblivious to this fact, instead, they admonished King George and protested. In fact, after multiple protests and predicaments, the Parliament reduced the sugar taxes that were imported. The Stamp and Townshend Act was enacted by British Parliament in 1764 and 1767. The Stamp Act mandated the use of stamped paper or the affixing of stamps, certifying payment of tax. The Townshend Act was light taxes on lead, paper, paint, and tea. Because American Colonist protested and created more problems again, the Stamp Act and Townshend act were repealed; however, tea was still taxed. These acts were only passed to raise money for the new military force. With new military force they could protect the colonist from future attacks from foreign countries. Americans felt that they were unfairly taxed for an unnecessary army. They saw this as an unruly decision. They believed Britain had no right to tax them and that they are taking all their money, thus, they disparage King George and label him as a Tyrant. American Colonists were not even taxed as much as Britain to begin with, so they should have no reason to riot and protest. In 1773, British East India Company, was overburdened with 17 million pounds of unsold tea; thus, was facing bankruptcy. American Colonist dressed as Indians and raided the this British ship full of tea from the British East India Company and dumped 342 chests of tea overboard, and this was known as the Boston Tea Party. This was a serious crime against the British Monarchy. To punish the colonies, namely Massachusetts, series of “Repressive Acts” was passed by the Parliament. Americans called this the “Intolerable Act.” The Intolerable Acts included: The Boston Port Act closed the harbor in Boston, self-government was limited by forbidding town hall meetings without approval, and the charter to Massachusetts was revoked. This only provided stability and order in society. American colonist viewed this as an absolute use of tyranny. This was perceived as a violation of their freedom. American Colonist viewed this as an offense against the law, but in truthfulness, this was a rational punishment and a necessity for order within society. The Boston Massacre was the killing of five colonists by British regulars on March 5, 1770. British troops had been stationed in Boston since protest and chaos were prompted by the Townshend Act. Because of these problems, The Quartering Act was passed. The Quartering Act stated that colonial governments to provide provisions and housing to British soldiers stationed in the 13 Colonies of America. Americans viewed this as tyranny because King George III was violating their individual rights. They saw this as a violation of their privacy. As such, the presence of British troops in the city of Boston was increasingly unwelcome. A "patriot" mob, threw snowballs, stones, and sticks at a squad of British soldiers. Even though these were not guns, these were potential objects that can harm and kill the soldiers. The soldiers accidently heard someone say open fire, and so they did. This was an accident not a massacre. The British soldiers did not brutally slaughter these victims, but the American Colonist still labeled this to be a crime against humanity and the unrighteousness of killing these innocent people. As such, this event ultimately was blamed on King George III. It was his responsibility and his fault for allowing this event to occur. Americans labeled King George III as a menace of society, a tyrant, but in fact they were the cause for all the usurpations and predicaments. American Colonist denounces King George as a Tyrant. They repeatedly censured him for unjust laws and violations against their rights. His injuries and infringements were cause by not him but by the Parliament and American Colonist. Since the king was the symbol of Britain’s Monarchy, he was the one to be condemned. Parliament enforced the laws, while American Colonist caused the problems. American Colonist was so obstinate to see the truth, so they disparaged King George III and label him as a tyrant.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Restated Thesis. Taxation without representation was common in the 13 colonies. Colonists often debated about why a small island, Great Britain, should rule a piece of a continent, the 13 colonies, from 3,000 miles away. The Stamp Act was issued by the British Parliament in 1765. The Stamp Act directly taxed printed materials. In Document 2, John Dickinson, a political leader from Pennsylvania, shows his disagreement with the Stamp Act. John Dickinson shares that Great Britain never thought the colonies would thrive as much as they did, so when the British Parliament issued the Stamp Act, and it was just for the purpose of raising Britain’s revenue, he disagreed with it. In addition, all the laws regarding the colonies only talked about regulating trade but it never intended the raising of taxes. John Dickinson, like many other patriots tolerated the old taxes, but at the Stamp Act, they drew the line, because Britain was taking money from the abundant colonies, with no benefits in return. The Townshend Acts followed the Stamp Act in 1767. Similarly, in Document 2, John Dickinson talks about the Townshend Acts having the same purpose as the Stamp Act, bringing more money to Britain. However, this time, when the Townshend Acts were issued, the tax was hid in the price. Charles Townshend hoped the colonists would be glad there were no more taxes even though the taxes would be right in the price. Unfortunately for Great Britain, the colonists realized that Britain was trying to be sneaky and hide the tax, so they got even madder. Moreover, the British never…

    • 528 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stamp Act Dbq

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the French and Indian war Britain had a lot. To help repay this debt they started taxing the colonists. In 1765 Britain passed the stamp act. The stamp act taxed many written and paper documents. The stamp act taxed so many documents that the colonists were paying a lot more money for things they buy everyday, like newspapers. If they wanted to buy some land they also had to pay a tax. The british did not let the colonist have a say with this act. The stamp act was against the law. The king was betraying his country. Document 1.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During 1765 the British Parliament imposed stamp tariffs on the American colonies. When George Grenville tightened up the administration of the colonial customs service and revised the rates which was “to make them produce a revenue, he knew that he was only beginning, that the colonies could and should contribute more to the cost of their defense. During the summer of 1763 he had already begun to consider the possibility of a stamp tax”. When introducing the idea to Parliament, “he managed to put the colonies in a position where a Stamp Act would be results of their own failure” this was because they would feel guilty for not supporting their mother country in a time of despair. England intended to raise revenue by tariffs on trade with a…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a patriot there are many reasons why I, Patrick Henry, dislike King George III (3rd). One of the many reasons is all the taxes that were passed by parliament. He started taxing us on sugar; or known as the sugar act. One of the worst things was the taxation without representation; they would tax us but not represent us. The one thing that didn’t involve a tax was that we couldn’t print our own money; we wanted our colony to print the money not Britain. Nobody except the loyalist wanted to keep King George III; well actually they didn’t want to disobey him. All the things he was doing was unfair to us, we had no benefits. The financial problems of Great Britain complicated the situation even more than it already has. They started out taxing us on stamps; they knew we needed them for official documents. Then the Townshend act was put into effect, that’s when we were taxed on goods which included basic items such as glass, tea, paper and lead. We had to import them because we didn’t make them. We all are just tired of all the taxes that parliament imposed. We felt like only our representatives had the right to tax us. After the Boston tea party happened, they set out the intolerable acts. They closed the Boston harbor until the Massachusetts colony paid for the ruined tea. The laws took away many of our rights, they were also making the Boston people shelter soldiers in their own homes. Those were just some of the reasons why I disliked King George III (3rd). I think it wasn’t necessary to tax us, people could barely afford food for their families even before the taxing started. What King George III (3rd) did just isn’t the right thing to do.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King George III ruled Great Britain during the years of the American Revolutionary War. American colonists were unsatisfied with his rule. As indicated by Bob Ruppert, between 1774 and 1776, he passed out many acts that people detested. Passage of the Coercive Acts, the Quebec Act, the New England Restraining Act, and the Prohibitory Act. King George lost all of the people's trust and faith. "A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may be define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people", Thomas Jefferson stated, saying that the king is a tyrant who violates people's natural rights and should not have power upon free people thus convincing them to support independence.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Software piracy and illegal file shares is becoming a bigger issue in modern day society, more likely with the youth of society. All computers now come with burn-ware technologies in which the user can take a product and create copies of that software. Originally, this process was created in order to provide methods of backing up a person’s computer files, in case of hardware crashing and system reboots. However, the situation has changed. People are now able to copy any type of media file (DVDs, CDs, operation systems, etc) and give out these products, free of charge. Do you like that CD that your friend bought the other day? Ask him to burn you a copy, then you can have it too. Did your latest version of Microsoft Windows crash…

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The king was also a tyrant. First, he let all of the above happen, and other things too, like the Proclamation of 1763. He declared the colonies ‘out of his protection’ and then proceeded to start the Revolutionary War. If he never sent people out to colonize America, this probably still would’ve happened, but people would overthrow him to create a new government.…

    • 63 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    My father was a local merchant in the city of Boston in 1764 when Parliament passed The Sugar Act1 in yet another attempt to increase Britain’s revenue after the end of the Seven Years War. One of nine children, my family struggled financially during the upcoming years. I suppose my parents worried constantly that we would suffer economic loss as Great Britain passed many taxation acts2 which further tightened any financial gain attained from the trade of goods. My father was friends with Samuel Adams3 and one cold winter night I snuck out, following my father, as I knew something big was about to happen. Father had been ranting all through supper how Parliament needed to be taught a lesson and he and Sam had gathered several men to protest this taxation without our consent.4 Hidden in the fog on the night on December 16, 1773, at the age of fifteen; I watched as my father, along with several other men dressed as Indians, threw barrels and barrels of tea shipped from the East India Company into the waters of the harbor.5 It was this event that made me determined, like my father, to remain true as a patriot and take a stance against the imperial government. This night was just the beginning of the political, economical, and social issues that I witnessed throughout the next two decades.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sugar Act taxed all common goods such as sugar, lumber, animal skins, and whale bone. The colonists responded in a mild protest, but it was not a huge issue for most. The next act past was the Stamp Act. The stamp act highly taxed stamps and made it so every paper had to have a stamp. The colonist were very angry about this act so they rioted until the act was repealed. The next revolutionary act was the Townshend Acts. This taxed common goods such as paper, tea, paint, and glass. The colonists responded to this act by boycotting British goods. Eventually British government repealed all the taxes except for the one on tea. This was not good enough for the colonist, they wanted all the taxes destroyed. They acted on this by going out in the middle of the night and throwing in 342 crates of tea into the Boston Harbor. As a punishment British government passed the Intolerable acts. There was four laws included in this act, the Boston Port Act, Massachusetts Government Act, Administration of Justice Act, and the Quartering Act. In the Boston Port Act the Boston Port was closed until the people of Boston had payed for it all. This was very significant because that port was used to import food, the citizens would starve without it. The Massachusetts Government Act stated that all town meetings or…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The colonist had power but not much. However, with what little they had, they used against the king. The stamp act and sugar act were placed which made the colonist angry. This placed all tax on printed material. The king wanted money from everyone. They felt as if they had no power or a voice to speak up for themselves.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stamp Act of 1765 was passed by the parliament basically to raise revenue. That led to new taxes being imposed on all American colonists. The Townshend Acts of 1767 was passed by the parliament to impose duties on the colonies. The Colonists were becoming more n more enraged. Then On March 5, 1770 The Boston “Massacre” happened. This was the big event that united the colonists and makes them go to war against the British. The Boston Massacre was when the British Soldiers began shooting at a crowd of colonists. Many people were dead and more was wounded. The picture shows how the British were violent and killers, it was sent throughout the colonies and it arouses anti-British feelings. {Document 2 & Document…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King George III did not follow Machiavelli's manual for being a good prince. Machiavelli's main lesson was "a prince must always seem to be generous, merciful, faithful, spirited, and humane." If a prince does not have those characteristics, his people will lose all support for him. King George III did not make sure people from the American Colonies saw him as a good King. King George III did not go out of his way to cover up his wrong doings. Instead, everyone knew he did not really care about the American Colonists. They knew he only cared about the land, and acquiring the largest empire. The King continually broke his own laws, contrary to Machiavelli's principles. Machiavelli once said, "a prince should always be able to come up with a reason for war". King George III didn't have a reason. He kept sending armies into the American Colonies. He transported large armies of foreign mercenaries to kill people and confiscate their land. By doing this, King George was only sabotaging himself.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King George III is an example of an individual who abused his authority. When George became Britain’s monarch, his primary objective was help Britain prosper. As the Thirteen Colonies were established over the years, George slowly began cementing his extensive authority over them as a way to make profits. He coveted obedience from the colonists and sent British troops to keep them in line. He started abusing his power when he began unreasonably taxing the colonies, leading to outraged colonists rebelling against the mother country. King George’s narrow mindset pushed him toward putting the British over the colonists and ultimately resulted…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One role King George role that was vital by King George in American Revolution was all the taxes he had put on the colonists such as such as the sugar act, stamp act, and the townshend act. The first parliament passed was known as…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clear from the start that King George is purely focused on self-interest. That is a quality of a dictator, not a leader. It is for that reason that I find the perspective of the 1776 Declaration of Independence to be the most convincing. When the authors of this document sat down to create it, they had one goal in mind, and that was to secure the rights that the colonists whole-heartedly deserved. They were stuck under Great Britain’s thumb, infected by the tyranny of King George, and beaten down by the broken system they had no choice but to answer to. They decided enough was enough, and they approached this document in the best way they knew how. The Declaration of Independence clearly explains several of the undemocratic, oppressive ways in which King George governed the colonies. The authors approached the document in a way that laid the facts out on the line clearly for all who read it to understand. There was no hidden intent or selfish desires. The colonies and the people within them simply wanted to govern themselves, and on July 4th 1776, the Declaration they composed made that dream a reality. “…these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of right out to be Free and Independent states; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved…” (Declaration of…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays