Preview

Kathleen Parker Can Words Kill People Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
190 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kathleen Parker Can Words Kill People Analysis
In “Can words kill people?” (2017) Kathleen Parker (an Opinion Writer for The Washington Post) declares that while words matter, the First Amendment entitles each person to free speech. Parker reinforces her declaration by informing about the limits of free speech (“the Constitution’s protections for nearly every form of speech short of the ‘fire’-in-a-crowded-theater prohibition.”), giving an example of what should be considered free speech (Carter telling her boyfriend to kill himself but her not helping him or actually killing him), and claiming “Words do matter, but they’re not lethal.” She informs, gives an example, and makes a claim in order to illustrate why cases like Carter’s should not result in a conviction (“what she said to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. What is the most “jealously” protected kind of speech, according to the court in this case? (3 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts of the Case: The Appellant Miriam Leverington, a nurse at Memorial Hospital (Appellee 1) in Colorado Springs, was pulled over in December of 2008 by Officer Duaine Peters (Appellee 2). During the course of the stop Leverington told the police officer that she hoped he was never her patient. Officer Peters replied, "I hope not too, because maybe I'll call your supervisor and tell her you threatened me." The Police officer did in fact, within 5 days after the incident, report Leverington’s comment to Memorial Hospital. Memorial Hospital took disciplinary action against her for making the comment to the officer. They disciplined her by terminating Leverington from her job as a cardiac nurse there. Leverington sued the City (Memorial) and Officer Peters for violating her rights to free speech. Leverington claimed that the officer had been rude and that she was just trying to communicate she hoped that she never had to interact with him again. Lower courts dismissed her case stating that her first amendment rights had not been violated. The decision went to appeals.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    News.com uses emotional language to try and illicit an emotional response from the audience, the article uses many direct quotes and verbs to paint a picture of the situation. The article implies a clear bias against George Zimmerman, and clearly favours the respectfully deceased Trayvon Martin and his family. The bias is clear before the article itself even begins, the title alone (“taunts family”) implies Zimmerman shows no remorse over Martins death. This writing style continues through the article naming Zimmerman as a “wannabe cop” and pointing out inconsistencies in Zimmerman’s statements and actions.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For my presentation, I reported on the Falwell vs. Flynt lawsuit, which was based upon the extent to which Americans have freedom of expression. An important aspect of this case was the dissimilarity of the two men involved: Jerry Falwell and Larry Flynt. Jerry Falwell was an important religious leader of the time. He was a radio evangelist, leader of a religious group called the moral majority, and voted 2nd most influential person in America (the first being the president). Falwell represented a pure America, a decent society in which its members were committed to moral standards. Larry Flynt was his complete opposite. Flynt was editor of the infamous Hustler…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court keyed the famous “clear and present danger” test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech, under the first amendment. In finalizing the conviction of a man accused with disturbing the peace by handing out provocative flyers to draftees of the war, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that in certain ways, words can create a “clear and present danger” in a way that Congress may constitutionally disallow. While the decision has since been overturned, Schenck is still a major point in creating context-based balancing tests used in reviewing Freedom of Speech challenges.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Keen first writes about the Famous court case McIntyre vs Ohio which protected anonymous speech under the 1st amendment. He questions the law and argues that if the this protected speech goes beyond just being rude and instead causes someone to harm themselves or others, should this also be covered under this ruling or should some consequence come as a result of this action?…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jenkins starts his article using an analogy to emphasize society’s strong feelings between kiddie porn, Timothy McVeigh, and snuff films to get readers on his side; everyone hates McVeigh for the Oklahoma City bombing and many people hate snuff films. Therefore, Jenkins figures that if he uses examples of instances where people have strong opinions of McVeigh and snuff films in the beginning of his article, then he will be able to persuade readers throughout the rest of his writing to believe his examples he gives for his thesis.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    As Walker put it “The American Civil Liberties Union was a unique organization….In contrast, the American Civil Liberties Union adopted the policy of impartially defending civil liberties, including the principle of free speech, without reference to the content of that speech” This comes at a time when “the Supreme Court had soundly rejected all First Amendment claims.” (47)…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people interpret speech as spoken word, but what many do not realize is that it is much more than just speaking whatever, whenever they please. Freedom…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of language can create fear, hysteria, and prejudice leading to negative consequences. In both Zoot Suit and the Central Park Five, the media and the language they used led to the wrong people being convicted. The language reinforced many stereotypes that were not true and created a lot of fear of the wrong people. This…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Janet Ainsworth

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ainsworth first explains the power of words in our legal system with the concept of speech acts, which invoke certain actions or decrees upon their declaration. The action or decree invoked depends…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas V Johnson

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The first amendment grants the citizens of the United States the right to speak freely, without legal persecution. Over the past 200 years since this amendment was enacted there have been hundreds of judicial cases devoted to interpreting and refining this law. One such case, reviewed by the United States ' supreme court in 1988, was Texas v Johnson. The case involved Johnson 's conviction of desecrating a venerated object (a Texas Statute) by burning a U.S. flag (Texas V Johnson(1989)). The importance of this case rests not only in the legality of flag burning, but also in the definition of speech. This was the primary concern of the supreme court when reviewing Texas v Johnson. Does the first amendment only pertain to spoken and written words, or can it be construed to protect other forms of expression?…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The right to freedom of speech came under scrutiny in the case of John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al. versus Free Speech Coalition, et al. in 2002. In this case, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Ninth Circuit's judgment against the plaintiff’s broader definition of pornography in enacting the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996. This broader definition, the court finds it in contravention with the First Amendment. The Ninth Circuit reasoned that the definition of banning any depiction of pornographic materials, including films that Congress adds on the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 was overboard and as such violated the First Amendment. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote: "First Amendment freedoms are most in danger…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book Freedom for the Thought that we Hate, author Anthony Lewis takes a simply phrased law, the First Amendment and shows how complex freedom of speech really is once put into the real world of freedom, as we know it. He shows through his rejections of absolutism, strong support towards freedom restriction, and objective analysis of Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, that the United States press is unlike any other in the world.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays