Preview

Karl Marx and Max Weber Different Views on Capitialism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3000 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx and Max Weber Different Views on Capitialism
Introduction of Karl Marx and Max Weber Theories

Karl Marx and Max Weber speak about capitalism and social class. They both agree that modern methods of organization have tremendously increased the effectiveness and efficiency of production. However they both have different concept of theories. Karl Marx speaks about Alienation and Critique of Capitalism .Marx argued that this alienation of human work is precisely the defining feature of capitalism. He regards alienation as product of the evolution of division of labor, private property and the state: When these phenomena reach an advanced stage, as in capitalist society the individual experiences the entire objective world as a conglomerate of alien forces standing over and above them. Marx with Hegelian notion of alienation but developed a materialist concept. For Marx the possibility that one may give up ownership of one’s own labor, one’s capacity to transform the world- is tantamount to being alienation from ones own nature; it is a spiritual loss. Marx noted that alienation can only be overcome by revolutionary abolition of the economic system based on private property.
In his “Preface a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy”, Marx had expressed this economic dialectic by saying that it was when “ the materials productive forces of society” came into conflict with “ the existing relations of production” that historical upheavals resulted ( Marx, 1976,page 3.).
Marx critique of capitalism is that it still produce inequality, reduces family relationship, destroys small business, enslaves and reduces all human relations to commercial relations. Marx states that, for the bourgeois man, the wife is reduced to a mere instrument of production. Moreover, once the exploitation of laborer by the manufacturer has finished, then he is set upon, says Marx by other segments of the bourgeoisie the landlord, the shopkeeper, the pawn broker in bourgeois society “capital is independent and has individuality,



Bibliography: Karl Lolita, Bryan S. Tuner and others- Book Max Weber and Karl Marx and Unwin- London-1985. Michael Payne, Meenakshi Ponnuswami- Dictionary of Cultural and Critical Theory. Marke Skousen – Making of Modern Economic Lives and Ideas of the Great thinkers. M. Weber- The Protestant Ethic and The spirit of Capitalism- Unwin Hyman Limited London- 1985. History of Karl Marx and Max Weber

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparing and contrasting Marx and Weber we see that their theoretical approaches seem to be completely different at first. However, we notice subtle similarities in their theoretical approaches that makes the consequences of their arguments. Marx and Weber apply their concept of specialization…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4)Weber, Max, 1864-1920.: The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism /Max Weber ; translated by Talcott Parsons. 2nd ed. / introduction by Anthony Giddens.. London : Allen and Unwin, 1976. 292 p.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx: the German philosopher with his works the communist manifesto and capital, provide a bitter critique of capitalism.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In aversion to the issues of capitalism concerning wage labor and abuse of the laborer by the employer, Karl Marx and Frederick Engles saw the ills of society in the convention of private property. In his own words, Marx said that communism could be summed up in one sentence, “abolition of private property” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). Marx saw private property in the industrial age as the “antagonism of capital and wage labor,” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). The positive results of industry only allowed the bourgeois to obtain more capital and hire more labor. Capital, therefore, is for the bourgeois a means to accumulate labor for the individual.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the time of Marx, capitalism had yet to become a dominant economic policy across Europe. It is clear, however, that both Marx and Engels could see its expansion and growth over time. They give the reader a clear picture of the emerging capitalist economy resulting from the Industrial Revolution. It is described as “everlasting uncertainty and agitation” (Marx 17), painting a picture of the early capitalism as an unstable and fragile economic system. Both Marx and Engels seemed to associate the rapid rate of technological change and financial instability as a sign of impending social revolution.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx and Engels stood firm in their belief that the main theme of industrial capitalism was freedom. They wanted the proletarians to have the freedom to become a complete human being by recreating oneself through free choices. They accredited a high importance to the human persona and thought that making a life was separate from producing an item for another person. Marx and Engels express their concerns for the human under capitalism through Communist Manifesto. Capitalism forces individual self-advance but only in preventive and misleading ways because almost everything the bourgeois society creates will only exist to be torn down. For Marx and Engels, capitalism is approaching a massive climax where those who are being crushed by it are overcoming the people who benefit from it. Marx recognizes, however, that the working class has no way of seizing property since none of them own anything themselves, consequently they will have to tear down and destroy all private ownership which will result in class itself disappearing. In such a notion that capitalism is seen as a "runaway train," Marx and Engels dispute the next stages in this historical dialectic is for the proletarians to own the ways of production, an arrangement where there will be a transposition of society so that those who are lacking power will now have it once they distinguish their…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 27 ]. Marx, et al,: On Historical Materialism, Moscow: Progress Publisher, 1972, 1sted, P.137-138.…

    • 4590 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx and Max Weber offer two very different but valid approaches to social class in modern capitalist society. In a capitalist society the private ownership of the means of production is the dominant form of providing the things needed to survive. What distinguishes capitalism from other types of society is the emphasis on the rights of property and the individual owner’s right to employ capital, as she or he thinks fit.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx and Moore

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx perceives society made up as two classes, the powerful and exploitive higher class known as the bourgeoisie and the industrial wage earners that must earn their living by selling their labor known as the proletariat. The bourgeoisie is known as the private property owners and the proletariat works for the bourgeoisie. There is an inequality between these two classes because the bourgeoisie takes advantage of the proletariat by having them work in order to live. Marx believes that what make us human are our productive and creative abilities and when the proletariat works, they lose individual character because they are working for their lives. This causes the proletariat to be alienated while the bourgeoisie capitalist basically sits back and uses the proletariat’s work to its full advantage.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Morrison. K. 2006. Marx, Durkheim, Weber: Foundations of Modern Social Thought. London: Sage Publications Ltd.…

    • 2924 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sociology - Class

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Both sociologists have agreed that economical factors were crucial in the shaping of social class and the inequalities of society. The key difference within these two theories is that Marx believes that two groups within society are important in understanding the workings of society, his groups are divided by the ownership of the means of production (property assets). Where Weber believes there are many more important groups and strata within those groups that need to be understood. Weber realised that there was other groups that needed to be recognised, as there is important conflict within Marx’s two classes, which needs to be understood to comprehend how the society operates.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weber's Protestant Ethic

    • 6051 Words
    • 25 Pages

    The writing of Weber indicates his sensitivity to diverse cultural meanings and his ability to find an ‘ethos’ or ‘geist” i.e. a spirit is largely indicative not of repudiating Marx’s economic analysis of society, but rather of rounding off Marx’s writings whilst valuing empathy, or understanding – ‘verstehen’ – in Weber’s native German. One of the primary questions that arose, for me, was why and where does this “rounding” off of Marx with empathetic understanding of the human condition emerge from?…

    • 6051 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Max Weber

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Max Weber, a German economist and sociologist is considered to be one of the most significant classical theorists because his methods that are still being implemented into modern sociological research. Weber is best known for his essay, The Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism, as well as being highly regarded for his ideas on bureaucracy, his study on class, status and party, and for his theory of social action., Almost all of Weber's writing's have had some kind, if not, a major impact on modern sociology.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays