Preview

Kant's Metaphysics Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2117 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Metaphysics Analysis
As we delve deeper into Kant’s Metaphysics we begin to get a comprehension of how Kant believes that knowledge of the world can be possible. In this essay, I hope to explain clearly the way Kant believes that to be able to understand the world, humans’ project certain rules and regulation that objects must conform to so that they can be understood. I also intend to explain that it is through these rules and regulations that we will see two forms of human understanding that will appear with three categories, and these will filter all our experiences so that we are able to understand them. Finally, we will continue to explore Kant’s argument against traditional metaphysics. At first, we will look at Kant’s Copernican revolution of the understanding. …show more content…
As for the pure forms of intuition, Kant says that this intuition is beyond mere concept, but something that is real and experienced. To intuit something is to see it and this seeing is the knowledge that relates the object to the mind. For example, how do we experience mathematics? Let’s take the concept 7+5=12, how can we experience this concept? The numbers 7, 5, and 12 cannot be experienced but the concept of addition tells us that the 7 and 5 need to be combined and the concept of equals tells us that 12 is the outcome of the combination. But the experience of this mathematical problem is our fingers, as we count from 7 up 5 and we end at 12 the concept of the problem is made real. The experience of mathematics is our counting and the objects we use to …show more content…
Understanding is a manifold that ties everything together in an orderly network. Both the intuition and understanding are stems that grow from the same root. This root could be considered the soul and from the soul, both stems grow, but the soul is buried deeply within us and only the divine intuition (God) is able to see it. If we view the world through our hardwired glasses of space and time, then we know that this knowledge of nature is a priori, it is guaranteed, but not nature itself, nature as experienced. This nature as experienced is the understanding that goes beyond the simple intuition of objects and brings the objects into human intelligibility. This intelligibility builds the knowledge into a systematized body that we can use for future

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals starts off by saying there is only one thing that is good without qualification which is a good will. Something can only be good if it is well-matched with a good will. In fact, “a good will is” according to him, “is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only through its willing i.e., it is good in itself” (7). He states that these specific obligations of a good will are called duties and then makes three propositions about them. Kant then says that “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In rationalism, reasoning and understanding is more important than the senses to the establishment of knowledge. Sense experience is an incoming visual, aural, touch,…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 1 Assignment

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "A large part of Kant's work addresses the question 'What can we know?' The answer, if it can be stated simply, is that our knowledge is constrained to mathematics and the science of the natural, empirical world. It is impossible, Kant argues, to extend knowledge to the supersensible realm of speculative metaphysics. The reason that knowledge has these constraints, Kant…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The voyage of discovery is not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes.”…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Critique of Pure Reason Kant discusses the dispute between rationalism and empiricism. The empiricists argued that all ideas are derived from sensation, and that objects of sensation are the only proper objects of knowledge. The rationalists argued that some ideas are not derived from sensation but are instead innate to reason, and that these ideas provide one with knowledge of supersensible realities such as God. Kant argues how knowledge is devoted to the power of demonstrating the truth or falsity of an idea, and that this power is restricted to the domain of sensibility. He stated that…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model, as Wood’s revealed, one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Conception of Value, Conception of Autonomy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In ‘Can we know God by experience?’ Peter Donovan questions whether it is possible to have direct, intuitive knowledge of God. Intuition is an experiential belief characterized by its immediacy. It is direct perception or insight without any need for evidence or argument. Intuition or intuitive knowledge is the main theme of Donovan. He suggested that knowledge can be attained through intuition. Especially the claim that people who have religious experiences can gain an intuitive knowledge of God. Donovan claims that God can be known through ‘finite things’. He considers the views of 20th century theologians and philosophers who have argued that religious experiences may provide knowledge of God, through intuition.…

    • 2589 Words
    • 74 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Paper 2

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    maxim and why you could not achieve the purpose or end of the maxim in…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant argues that the human understanding of our world is perceived by our experiences and only through them can we gain knowledge. Kant’s philosophic question is rooted in the theory of understanding; in short, what can we know and how can we know it? Most of our knowledge of the world can be derived from our observation of it. As children, we see things, touch things, smell things and so on. Gradually, we understand the world in which we live in; this is the knowledge of sense-perception. For example, wind has no physical form but we can see its effects and can classify it as being part of nature. Kant, however, perceives knowledge only through our experiences. So going back to the example of wind, Kant would say we have knowledge of wind not because we…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This reading “What Is Enlightenment?”, is written by Kant. Kant claims that man does not use their own enlightenment because there are other people with higher intelligence that can make the hard decisions for them and, that, the people listening will obey. Kant supports his claim that mankind does not utilize their enlightenment because they do not have freedom, they are lazy, and cannot escape their own nonage.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Skepticism

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Metaphysics itself takes on characteristics of dogma, while its dogmatic use without critique lands us in groundless assertions, to which other assertions, equally plausible, can always be opposed, and hence is skepticism. By virtue of the above statements grounded in their procedure, and by the examples noted, defined, and categorized according to Kant himself skepticism becomes self-refuting. However, this is only the case, according to Kant’s definitions if metaphysics is looked upon as dogmatic. The bigger problem is that metaphysics as a science cannot deal with objects of reason, but of reason itself imposed upon it by its own…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Analysis

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant is a philosopher that has always stuck out because the way he approaches morality is particularly different than most other philosopher. Some would say that Kant’s philosophy works satisfactorily in a perfect world, but fails to account for how the world actually is, which is far from perfect. Even if this is true the groundwork of Kant’s work has still garnered the admiration of many philosophers that were during and after his time.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    kant

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant was a deontologist who believed that knowledge was created by the mind, not external factors; because of this he wanted to unite reason and experience. Humanity’s frail nature was the human condition according to Kant, their struggle to make moral decisions and do the right thing can only be solved by employing reason and his three maxims when decision making.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I disagree with Kant’s using the transcendental ideas for there must also be material conditions. Eventually, the material conditions are as important as the ideas. When he talked about mind formulates the concept of self how about the body. The mind cannot exist without the body. The world does not contain only the events but also the material things. Therefore the mind must have the concept of both form and matter. Thus, I support Kant there are some transcendent ideas cannot be proven as they are beyond human sense experience; we have just to believe they exist.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant constantly stressed that we have a sense of duty that follows a law like characteristic, and in turn we are all autonomy individuals. We as human beings are self- law giving, and constantly seek to harmonize our realm of ends. Our realm of ends allows us to follow a universal law which will lead us to bettering each other through rational actions. However, rationality is decided through our reason, and our reason is to create happiness in the end. Many businesses these days have autonomic power and some exercise these powers to reach a realm of ends, but some do not. Firms like those on Wall Street made irrational decisions through their autonomic powers, which lead our economic into…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays