To start off, Kant's moral theory is deontological because it emphasize the concept of duty. According to Kant, the right actions should only develop from pure motives and from a sense of duty. In other words, that action should conform to moral laws and done from motivation of good will. Good will is what Kant defined as a one's intention to follow the moral law to ensure that all actions arise from the only purpose of doing what is right. Any motivations that influence the action would make that action morally worthless. In addition, the basis of deontological view is that an action cannot be considered right because of the positive consequences that follows, but rather the action itself has to be correct in itself. For example, if your neighbor's house was on fire and you decided to go in to rescue, your only intention should be to save the people inside and no other reasons beyond that. The action you choose to perform should be universal that everyone should be made to follow that action because it is a universal norm. The nature of morality is to do one’s duty even when we are not inclined to do it, and not …show more content…
The strength of the moral theory is that it allows one to self evaluate their behaviors and their true intentions before carrying out their actions. Most of the time, we are not aware of the unconscious intentions that is hidden underneath our actions. With Kant's moral theory, we can carefully analyze whether our actions are dedicated wholeheartedly for the good of others. The weakness within Kant's moral theory is that duties are not ranked in order of most to least important. This can result in immoral dilemmas as well as tragic outcomes when obeying the particular duty. As an example, we can refer back to a eerie and remorseful times during the Holocaust. If you were in the shoes of a family who was hiding a Jewish family in their home to protect their lives, and a German soldiers arrived all of the sudden to question, you are faced with a dilemma between obeying your duty by telling the truth or to tell a lie in order to protect the Jewish family. Therefore, the duty of telling the truth would result in an unjust consequence and it proves that no set of rules can control the different possibilities and events that occurs throughout