Preview

Kantianism: The Volkswagen Scandal Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
348 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kantianism: The Volkswagen Scandal Case
An example in everyday life that assists in my understanding of Kantianism involves taking into consideration a hospital which has three dying patients who need organ transplants. A healthy individual with no ties to any friends or family arrives to undergo a procedure in donating his organs. The doctor then has to come to a decision in order to save the dying patients over the healthy one. According to the Kantianism theory, killing the healthy patient would be using a person as a means to an end, which therefore violates the categorical imperative. Therefore, the doctor would not be morally justified in killing the patient.

The ethical philosophy of Kantianism can be directly applied to the Volkswagen (VW) scandal case study. When referring
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Multiple Ethical Selves Case Study
    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Multiple Ethical Selves Case Study

    Roles: The mechanics and Auto Sales Advisers did not know how to behave ethically in their assigned roles and did not have ethical managers to guide them. They responded to the new compensation package with greed and the intense pressures from upper management to…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Ford Pinto Case: A Dangerous Product
    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Ford Pinto Case: A Dangerous Product

    "The Ford Pinto case is mentioned in most Business Ethics texts as an example of Cost-Benefit analysis, yet in those formats any appreciation of the complexity surrounding the issues of such decisions is overly simplified. As a thorough study, this book provides material that enriches the entire idea…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ford Pinto- Ethics
    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ford Pinto- Ethics

    In early 1968, the Ford Motor Company decided to take on the foreign car competition by introducing a compact, affordable vehicle they named the Pinto. What began as the decision to enter the race for the top small car ultimately led to an unprecedented court case wherein the Ford Motor Company found itself charged with reckless homicide and was the first corporation charged with criminal conduct. In this paper, the authors delve into the tragedy of the Ford Pinto fires and the ethical standards and boundaries of the Ford Motor Company at that time.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Dillemmas in Crash
    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical Dillemmas in Crash

    It's the sense of touch. In any real city, you walk, you know? You brush past people, people bump into you. In L.A., nobody touches you. We're always behind this metal and glass. I think we miss that touch so much, that we crash into each other, just so we can feel something.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Arguments On Ethical Decision-Making
    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant's Arguments On Ethical Decision-Making

    The deontological/Kantian ethical-decision making philosophy was created by the philosopher Kant. His view on ethical-decision making is about how we morally commit an act or decide on something in the sense of obligation. Kant indicates that ethics is about acting upon our own duty, essentially doing what we ought to do. This philosophy is solely about duty. For example, one can say that “I ought to do my homework”, in this case it would be my duty do my homework in order to get a good grade. Another proposition is, following a maxim when it comes to acting on an action out of oughtness. This maxim one may have is like a policy that one will follow by, when a particular situation or event arises.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    E- Cigarettes: Legal and Ethical Controversy (Professor F. Cavico)
    • 3888 Words
    • 16 Pages

    E- Cigarettes: Legal and Ethical Controversy (Professor F. Cavico)

    CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORSHIP: I certify that I am the author of this paper and that any assistance I received in its preparation is fully acknowledge and disclosed in the paper. I have also cited any sources from which I used data, ideas of words, whether quoted directly or paraphrased. I also certify that this paper was prepared by me specifically for this course.…

    • 3888 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant Code Of Ethical Decision Making
    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant Code Of Ethical Decision Making

    In the process of decision making there are various processes that are followed by the decision makers and the stakeholders involved. In organizations, the management and the major stakeholders have the responsibility of decision making. Decisions made at an organizational level may have wide effects in the future. Therefore, it is always important for decision makers to ensure they take into consideration all the factors that may affect the decision making process (Ess, 2002). Having consultations from other professions in similar fields is one of the most fundamental principles that professionals use when caught between important decisions that have to be chosen.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Kantian Approach To Business Ethics
    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Kantian Approach To Business Ethics

    The writer here talks about a man named Kant who lived in the 18th Century and is best known for defending a version of the “respect for persons” principle which implies that any business practice that puts money on a par with people is immoral or unethical. Kant argued that the highest good was the goodwill. To act from a good will is to act from duty. Thus it is the intention behind an action rather than its consequences that makes that action good. The article goes on to focus on some of the implications of Kant’s three formulations of the fundamentals of ethics. Kant’s first formulation was that he believed every action has a maxim, we are to ask what would happen if the principle (maxim) of the action were a universal law. Would a world where everyone acted on that principle be possible? Kant uses an example where he focuses on the concept of lying promises, when adopted as a principle by everyone it is incoherent. The second formulation he focused on was to treat humanity in a person as an end and not for means merely and lastly he believes that organizations are composed of persons and given the nature of persons, organizational structures must treat the humanity in persons with dignity and respect. Kantian ethics sure had limitations, Kant had nothing to say about environmental ethics , lack of understanding on animal suffering and the biggest challenge Kantian ethics being too demanding yet kants moral philosophy has rich implications for business practice.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Carson's Argument Essay
    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Carson's Argument Essay

    In his paper, Carson points out 4 main arguments that we can derive from the recent corporate scandals (e.g. Enron, WorldCom). The arguments pointed out revolve around the flaws and inadequacy in current business approaches such as the stakeholder theory, shareholder theory and incentives system in corporations currently. In my response paper, I will make use of ethical theories such as Kantian ethics, Utilitarianism, Rawl’s theory of justice etc. to analyse the arguments made in the paper and to evaluate if some of the corporate acts mentioned in the paper are ethical.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kants Moral Thoery
    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kants Moral Thoery

    Immanuel Kant is one of the most respected and studied philosopher of all time and is known for his basic yet in-depth moral theories and the belief that morality stems not from divine command or cultural conditioning but from reasoning and human freedom. His straight forward beliefs come from his very strict Lutheran upbringing which consisted of universal rights and universal wrongs with no exceptions(. He believed his moral laws to be universal and applied to every being including God, spirits and extraterrestrials. His ethics made him a leading figure in deontology which judges people on their actions, not the consequences of their actions, as morally significant. And actions are only as good as their intent to be morally permissible.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Mindet Of Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Mindet Of Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

    However, the duty of a doctor is to help others stay alive and according to the moral law of one should not cut someone else, then the doctor would not be allowed to cut their patient in order to heal them if the consequences were not thought deciding factor. A problem with Kant’s theory is that he believed that our duties were absolute and we are obligated to obey the commands of our duties. The problem with this is when one would be in a moral dilemma, at…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant Theory and Justice
    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Kant Theory and Justice

    Immanuel Kant concerns himself with deontology, and as a deontologist, he believes that the rightness of an action depends in part on things other than the goodness of its consequences, and so, actions should be judged based on an intrinsic moral law that says whether the action is right or wrong – period. Kant introduced the Categorical Imperative which is the central philosophy of his theory of morality, and an understandable approach to this moral law. It is divided into three formulations. The first formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative states that one should “always act in such a way that the maxim of your action can be willed as a universal law of humanity”; an act is either right or wrong based on its ability to be universalized. This belief is part of the “universal law theory” and states that to determine if an action is essentially “good” or “bad,” one must essentially imagine a world in which everyone performed that same action constantly, and imagine if this would be a desirable world to live in. If not, then it is not okay to perform the action. He believes that this “universal law” lives within us; it is not something that is imposed on us from the outside. For example if one kills oneself out of self-love, it is logically contradictory because self-love refers to respect for one’s self as a rational being and rationality is based on objective (undistorted by emotion or personal bias). So, one can never justify suicide. The maxim of killing oneself cannot possibly exist as a universal law. The second formulation states that one must “treat humanity whether in thine own person or in that of any other, in every case as an end withal, never as means only.” For example, if I were to lie to a girl so that she would choose to go out with me then I, in effect, use her. Kant would say that I treated her as a means to achieve my end, and he specifically prohibits manipulating or deceiving a person for the purposes of achieving a personal end. According…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Applying Kant's Theory To The Ford Pinto Case
    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Applying Kant's Theory To The Ford Pinto Case

    Immanuel Kant would have would have certainly believed that Ford acted wrongly by not upgrading the integrity of the Pinto’s fuel system after learning about the danger of explosions in low-speed rear end collisions. Kantian deontology asserts that “nothing can possibly be conceived in the world, or even out of it, which can be called good, without qualification, except a good will.” (Kant 1). Although some human qualities are intrinsically valuable, or good for their own sake, Kant believes that these actions can become bad if the intention of the user is questionable. This intention is what ultimately determines the morality of an action, meaning “a good will is good not because of what it performs or effects, not by its aptness for the attainment of some proposed end, but simply by virtue of the volition.” (Kant 2). These “virtue of volitions” are referred to by Kant as maxims, or fundamental principles for conduct and decision making. Kant believes that in order for a maxim to be morally valid, it must be able to be universally applied to situations…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluate Kant's Categorical Imperative (25 Marks)
    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Kant's Categorical Imperative (25 Marks)

    Kant’s categorical ethics is a deontological theory of ethics, this means that the actions are either intrinsically right or intrinsically wrong, this is due to absolute law; the outcome of the situation is not important to Kant’s theory even if the outcome may be good. Kant has a deontological theory because he believes that you must stick to the moral rules and beliefs that you have no matter what the turn out. An example of this would be, Lying is wrong, the action you must take is to never lie no matter what the circumstances. His theory is categorical due to that he believes that you are doing something because it is your duty and you have to, it is based on reason alone; this links to deontological ethics because the basis is the same.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Web Porn at Work
    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Web Porn at Work

    When faced with moral issues in every facet of life, individuals often rely on normative theories for guidance in their decision-making process and its subsequent justification. In the case of Rayburn Unlimited, Al Smetana, the founding president, discovers that Craig Lindley, the associate vice-president and an old-time friend, has been using the company’s computer network extensively for web pornography. At the current juncture, Al is faced with the decision of how to resolve the situation with Craig, debating between the spectrum of upholding the firm’s commitment to integrity, the importance of the intrinsic worth of each individual, and the personal friendship with Craig. This decision by Al falls into the categorization of a moral issue due to two reasons: Firstly, it involves an analysis of harms and benefits. That is, this decision has the potential to leave individuals involved in a better or worse position after the decision is made. Secondly, throughout the decision-making process, Al utilizes moral standards, which takes priority over both the self interest of Al or Craig. With that in mind, let’s analyze the decision “What should Al do with Craig” using two popular normative theories, Utilitarianism and Kantianism.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics