Preview

Kant Vs Rousseau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1563 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant Vs Rousseau
There are two political theories that I combined and will implement if I were to be placed as the highest-ranking official of the country. These are the theories of Immanuel Kant and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. I chose to unite the two theories because both of them, as I was reading through its contents, had the biggest impact on me than all the other theories I researched for. The joined theories would build up my ideal state as a leader of the country so that I may be able to take the people to a better state of life, in my innocent opinion as part of this country’s youth.

First, allow me to discuss to you Immanuel Kant’s political philosophy. His approach to politics favored classical republicanism. The doctrine of Rechtsstaat is Kant’s biggest
…show more content…
It is a legal maxim that suggests that governmental decisions be made by applying known legal principles. Aristotle one quoted, “Law should govern”. It implies that every citizen is subject to the law. It stands in contrast to the idea that a ruler is above the law, for example by divine right.

Going back to Immanuel Kant’s philosophy, he also supported the separation of powers of the executive, legislative and judicative branches of government. The executive and the judicative are bound by law, while the legislative is bound by constitutional principles. Rechtsstaat also requires transparency of state acts and the requirement of providing a reason for all state acts. The doctrine also demands for a hierarchy of laws and the requirement of clarity and
…show more content…
In a country where a wealthy minority indulged themselves while hundreds of thousands suffered from severe poverty and inflation, people yearned for a basic equality, natural or government ordained. Many felt that if the general will (or the will of the people) was for change, that the current government was expected to make compromises. The First Estate of the French government was against these changes, the Second Estate was to some extent and later cast its lot in with the Third Estate. Later the idea of a utopian government changed to 'the will of the people' (although how successful this was carried out can be debated, in both France and the U.S.) Maximillien Robespierre, who played an important part in the middle to later events in the Revolution and was one of the architects of the Terror, was deeply influenced in his youth by Rousseau's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Essay On Enlightenment

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Thus a public can only attain enlightenment slowly. Perhaps a revolution can overthrow autocratic despotism and profiteering or power-grabbing oppression, but it can never truly reform a manner of thinking; instead, new prejudices, just like the old ones they replace, will serve as a leash for the great unthinking mass” (36). Kant prophesied that enlightenment will cause waves in bourgeoisie class, and it was possible through revolutions and changes that the world went over. As an illustration, a great example of the transformation could be shown from the changes of political view in France. That is, when revolution was sparked by the fierce passions of Frenchmen and issued statement of rights, demanding equality and freedom, among others. King Louis XVI was viewed as villain through the eyes of the revolutionary, where he governed France through monarchy. His rich in the palace of Versailles were seen as tyranny, and his credibility worsened as the people of French starved from scarcity. “the kernel gradually reacts on a people’s mentality, and it finally even influences the principles of government, which finds that it can profit by treating men, who are now more than machines, in accord with their dignity” (42). As Kant’s prediction, the First French Republic was formed and aimed for a better government and the desire for equality. They…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Baron de Montesquieu was a highly influential political philosopher who lived during the 17th and 18th centuries. Through observations of many different civilizations in his travels all around Europe, he was able to formulate revolutionary ideas and theories about politics and government that still affect the world to this day. In his works, Montesquieu highlighted what he believed was wrong with society at the time, explained different governmental systems and their individual characteristics, and theorized how a government could be made to be as well-functioning and efficient as possible. Overall, the works and ideas of Montesquieu, in addition to having a large effect on Europe during his time, inspired later philosophers and influenced…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the past many years, people have been trying to figure out the relationship between the government and nature of man. The theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau about the connection between nature of man and the government have been debated for many years. These three philosophers have remarkably influenced the way our system works today. Although each theory had its flaws and merits, Jean Jacques Rousseau’s theory is superior in comparison to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brandy V Hrec

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Constitution is divided into separate chapters dealing separately with the parliament, executive and the Judicature. The "pure" doctrine of separation of powers prescribes that the functions of the three arms of government be clearly and institutionally…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rousseau Vs Hobbes

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    In favor of Hobbes, he does make several valid points. His theory in regards to constant competition applies to this day, as people constantly find themselves in situations where they meet others that are of equal physical strengths and could be faced with a conflict as a result. Despite the points that Hobbes makes, his theory is overall negative, as living in a constant state of fear and paranoia is absolutely no way to live one’s life. Rousseau is very pertinent to remind others of how life was before society and technology took over. Life was extremely simple, and everyone was fairly alright with living alone and focusing on themselves and their life. If today’s society was the same as it was over a thousand years ago, almost no one would…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They had no desire to change the existing system of government in England. In the end, the English monarchy agreed to the separation. However, the French citizens, on the other hand, wanted a democratic ideology for their entire nation. They sought to change every segment of France, including the social structure, the economy, the political system, and the legal system. The existence of the feudal state in France, with an extreme difference between the classes, was a contributing factor to the chaos that occurred during this revolution. Although King Louis XVI showed some support, at times, for the people, he never wanted to give up his power or control of his country. As a result, the people were forced to use extreme measures to gain equality and try to bring France out of financial and political turmoil. Fear, suspicion, and desperation drove the revolutionaries to commit violent and fanatical acts to gain the attention for their…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Canovan argued that Hannah Arendt failed to realize that political opinions too have drawbacks. According to Arendt, different people have different opinions and claims that one political opinion can bring an enhancement on another. Based on this assumption, she adopted Kant’s notion of “judgement,” that is, “to think for the sake of general” into her political thinking. But Habermas rejected her ideas on the ground that it is “monologic.” She seems to have left no room for “rational truth” in political affairs. On the other hand, Canovan also disputed on Habermas’s insistence for fixing his attention on rational consensus. Habermas assumes that “just” society can be institutionalized if political discourse is based on ideal discourse. On this ground, Arendt also argued that Habermas’ idea of placing politics on rational consensus might lead him into a dangerous illusion. Canovan’s concern on the distinctive views of rational communication between Arendt and Habermas however leave a sarcastic remark on the latter because according to her Habermas might have to wait his whole life in…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Government gives the citizens protection and guidelines for one’s daily behavior which may often result in an individual’s well-being and contentment, because without the necessity of a government our society would be chaotic. For example, the government can protect our health from the food we intake by inspecting the restaurant to make sure the food is safe for the public. Still, we as a society do not notice the small actions the government completes to ensure we have safety. In order for the people to be pleased in the environment we live in, the government must enforce all regulations. On the other hand, Enlightenment thinking promotes liberty since one is presented with a voice in government which gives the individual the ability to ‘be free within society’, because one is capable of involving oneself in new knowledge and speaking for their stance. Additionally, the people can be free with their…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philosophy is referred to as a set of beliefs, concepts and attitudes held by an individual or a group of people. It is the study of problems in general and the prescription of solutions to problems based on critical and systemic analyses and the employment of rational argument. Philosophy through the lens of Political Science does so as mentioned above in terms of the state, the governance of the state the ethics of an individual in possession of political power. Political philosophers focus on the issues relating to the state, such as political action that need or need not be taken and the general behavior of a given individual involved in politics. With the focus set on just the state, political action and violence, two philosophers have critically analyzed politics through the three concepts listed above: Niccolo Machiavelli and Max Weber. They each have their own views, opinions and suggestions that both have similarities and differences considering the cultural and temporal inconsistency between the both of them. The fact that some of their ideas intersect is fascinating.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution - 1

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many issues that led up to the French Revolution. For example, the unfair tax burden. According to Document two, the Third Estate paid all of the government taxes. There were three estates. The 1st estate was all of the clergy; they had wealth because they collected taxes from the 3rd estate and they also owned land. They had power, food, liberty, and freedom. The 2nd estate was the rich titled nobility. They derived their wealth from land ownership, and they collected some taxes. They also had power, food, and freedom. The 3rd estate was separated into three different classes. The Bourgeoisie was the highest of the third estate; they had cash wealth since they were made up of the merchants, bankers, and artisans. The Bourgeoisie paid very high taxes, and had very little power, they had a food supply, but they had no power. The peasant farmers, and the city workers had no wealth, power, or liberty, and they had to pay taxes. The 1st and 2nd estate only took up about 3% of the population. The Bourgeoisie thought that the taxes were unfair to the entire 3rd estate. Document three explained how a peasant had 7 children, and couldn’t support her family, but she still had to pay taxes. This shows how unfair the tax burden was.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    US Constitution 1

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This book discussed the most efficient way to set up political community. Government should be of the people. – Two Treatises of Government by John Locke. This book discussed the idea that every man is created equal under God. Content of the Constitution •…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Canada's Legal System

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The principle means that individuals must recognize and accept that we need laws to regulate society (Justice Education Society, 2013). According to the Justice Education Society, Rule of Law "expresses the principle that all people are equal under the law and no one is above the law." The law is important in maintaining order within society. Laws exist in society to protect the members of society and ensure safety for…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ideas of the Enlightenment influenced the French Revolution. The third estate, or the poorest social group, held very little rights socially or politically. But some of them, such as doctors and lawyers, were educated and could read the new ideas of government from philosophers. For example, philosophers like John Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau. “The Revolution had been accomplished in the minds of men long before it was translated into fact... The middle class...was sensitive to their inferior legal position. The Revolution came from then-the middle class. The working classes were incapable of starting or controlling the Revolution. They were just beginning to learn to read.” (Document 4) The Third Estate studied these ideas; They had used ideas like Equality, Liberty, and Democracy. The Third Estate inspired The French Revolution. (ROI) These men spoke of democratic governments, with certain freedoms and natural rights. Eventually, the people of the third estate began to question their government in France, and by the standards of these philosophers, demanded change. The cahiers reflect the ideas of the Enlightenment such as democracy and equality. “That the king forced to reform the…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Virtue, without which terror is destructive; terror, without which virtue is impotent” (Zizek). Maximilien Robespierre said this in a speech when people were starting to question his judgment. He believed that to be only virtuous was difficult, and without some terror added in, the world would go into turmoil as no one would follow their leader. A leader has to be strong and forceful, and sometimes even terrifying to get their point across, or to get people to follow them. Robespierre always wanted what was best for France and was willing to do anything to get it, even if that meant causing harm to the people of France. He felt that as long as the outcome of his hard work came with the results he wanted, anything he did was justified. Despite all the horror of the Reign of Terror, Maximilien Robespierre was a virtuous man. He not only reacted to the problems in France with determination, but he created a clear program to help France in this troubled time. He also was the leader of many committees and he established many laws to further the French Revolution. Even when some of the people of France started to turn against him, he produced a program to help them, not to harm them. Robespierre always had France’s best interests at heart. He never wanted to have to use terror as a means of moving the French Revolution forwards, but he believed it had to happen for the better of France. He was a virtuous man from the beginning right up until the end and for that, he will be well remembered.…

    • 2446 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In ancient times all men lived in a state of nature until hardships and the necessity to form a civil society between one another became eminent. Jean Jacques Rousseau’s “The Social Contract,” analyses the steps and reasoning behind this transition. In Rousseau’s work he focuses on several key terms in order to define this transition clearly, they include: state of nature, social contract, civil society, general will, and the sovereign.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics