Preview

Kant and Descartes

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1016 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant and Descartes
Liz Johnson
December 12, 2012

Kant and Descartes
“Idealism is the assertion there are none but thinking thing beings. All other things, which we believe are perceived in intuitions, are nothing but presentations in the thinking things, to which no object external to them in fact corresponds. Everything we see is just a construction of the mind.” (Prolegomena). Idealism maintains that there are no objects in the world, only minds. According to idealism, the existence of outer objects is uncertain and ambiguous. Idealism is the group of philosophies asserting that actuality is fundamentally mental, or otherwise intangible. Kant holds the belief that objects only exist as perceptions is fundamentally idealist. The argument begins by making the point: our senses never enable us to experience things in themselves, but only know their appearances. This idea depicts space and time as empty forums to determine how things appear. Kant discusses how math consists of synthetic a priori cognitions, or the ability to provide new information that is necessarily true, and its relation to geometry. Kant believes there is some form of pure intuition innate within us. This innate intuition is what allows us to identify different notions without reference to sense experience.
In the opinion of Kant, the possibility of mathematics rests upon the possibility of “synthetic propositions a priori”. (Prolegomena). There is a priori certainty of geometry. A priori knowledge or justification is independent of all experience. A priori judgments are based upon reason alone, independently of all sensory experience, and therefore are applicable with universality. According to Kant, “Geometry is based upon the pure intuition of space.” (Prolegomena). We cannot have any perceptions of objects if not in space and time. Kant declares, “it must first exhibit its concepts in intuition, and do so a priori, in an intuition that is not empirical, but pure.” (Prolegomena).

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the approaches of ethics which bases morality on foundational principle of obligations or duties is called Deontology (Fieser, 2015). Deontological ethics is concerned on the action being morally right because of some characteristic of the action itself, not because the consequences or the outcome of the action is good (Brittanica.com, 2015). For instance, lying is morally wrong but if a person has to commit a lie in order to save the life of someone, the action of that person would still be wrong although that action may produce a good outcome (BBC.co.uk, 2014). The theories of Immanuel Kant and Sir William David Ross are widely known in the field of deontological…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Vs Kant

    • 49 Words
    • 1 Page

    The existence of God has be scrutinized and drafted anew countless times. Philosophers René Descartes and Immanuel Kant were no different. Each respectively had their own rationale to the existence of God. This paper will argue in favor of Kant’s objections to Descartes’ a priori justification of God’s existence.…

    • 49 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a philosopher that focused on religion and science. He often had ideas that religion was explained by science. He believed for someone to have room in their mind for faith, they needed to have less room in their mind for other things. If someone is uneducated and is interested in fires or hurting people, then they will have no room in their mind for faith and that is why they do not believe.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates and Descartes

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To say that a man is defined by what he does in his life is an understatement when you think of two of the greatest philosophers ever. Each man was very respected while they were living but when you have hundreds or thousands of people still talking about you after your death there is something very special to say about that. Socrates and Rene Descartes spent their life looking for the truth. They looked for the perfect answer to every question because both of them wanted the answers no one could have an answer too. Although these men were alive at very different times, they had the same ideas about life.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant and Thomas Aquinas were two great philosophers who developed arguments for the existence of God and taught ways of critically assessing the natural world. They both believed that we all are born the same and learn through experience. You must first experience something in order to gain knowledge by experiencing it first. This meant that people could not be certain about something until they “saw” it first. They both believed in “free will” and that everyone could make their own choices but god had a plan that was ultimately the best. Another similarity between Kant and Aquinas was their schooling and their profession after school. They both went through extensive schooling and ultimately became teachers. The biggest difference in the two was their belief in god. Kant believed in god but did not believe there was a way to prove his existence. Aquinas spent his life trying to prove there was a way to prove his existence.. Aquinas would make logical examples that make you understand where he was coming from. “One of Thomas Aquinas’ examples begins with the idea that someone decides to build a house with deep foundations and solid supports. Obviously, that person would begin by digging the foundation, but at some point, he or she would have to stop the digging process in order to actually erect the house. This implies that the hole for the supports would have to end somewhere in the earth. Likewise, creation must be traced back to a specific point that governs and explains existence.” The most simple principle of Mills idea on utilitarianism is the greatest happiness principle, an action is right as long as it is maximizing utility. Everybody’s happiness is equal in a sense and counts as much as anyone else’s. There are some things that we are forbidden to do to other people regardless of whether the loss of that individual’s utility would be made up by increases in other people’s utility. Utility is defines as happiness, but we all have our own…

    • 503 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It all started when John Locke was born in 1632 in Wrington. Locke spent his childhood in the West Country and was later on sent to Westminster School in London. He was very well of there to the point he earned a place at the Christ Church in Oxford and remained there from 1652 to 1667. After completing his undergraduate degree, he developed an essay on the Law of Nature. In 1667, Locke left Oxford for London to become a tutor for the family of Anthony Ashley Cooper. In London, he continued to study his interest in medicine and natural philosophy. The most important period of Locke’s life was when he began the project that would bring his work to a new level, The Essay Concerning Human Understanding. This project took him about 20 years to finished and the first two draft came out in 1671. In 1689, Locke finally came back to England after escaping from political persecution published both the Essay and the Two Treatises. Shortly after he fled to live somewhere else and met a notable philosopher named Ralph Cusworth, and became friends for many years. Later in the years, Locke devoted his attention to theology and his major work was in The Reasonableness of Christianity, which was later on published in 1965. Before his death, Locke wrote a work on Pauline Epistles and sadly the work was unfinished but was published posthumously. In 1704, his health took a turn for the worst and he died on October 28, 1704 while Damaris was…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    René Descartes is generally considered the father of modern philosophy. He was the first major figure in the philosophical movement known as rationalism, a method of understanding the world based on the use of reason as the means to attain knowledge (Palmer, 2011). Along with empiricism, which stresses the use of sense perception rather than pure reason, rationalism was one of the main intellectual currents of the Enlightenment, a cultural movement spanning the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries that revolutionized the Western world (Palmer, 2011). In tandem with men like John Locke, John Hobbes, and Voltaire, Descartes spurred society to re-examine its traditions and institutions, leading to massive social upheaval. Both the American and French Revolutions were based on Enlightenment theories, and the ways we approach science, math, philosophy, and the idea of the self were radically transformed during the period.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes and Locke

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most important branches in philosophy, is Epistemology, which means, theory of knowledge. So far, philosophers have made many attempts to discover the source of knowledge, the standards or criteria by which we can judge the reliability of knowledge. We tend to be satisfied with think what we know about almost everything, even though sometimes we are shocked to discover that something that we thought it was sure and certain, is instead proved dubious and not sure. For example, suppose that one person that you know and trust tells you that the moon landing in 1969 is only a lie, and the pictures and film were made in a laboratory. We might distrust our friend maybe or think that in fact there were no prove of this, or even distrust yourself. Off course you will start to search information regarding that specific fact, and start looking for an evidence that will lead you to the truth. That’s why I think that the most fertile source of knowledge is the history of human opinions. Knowledge, in fact, is the relationship between a person and the world. While most philosopher agree with this basic definition, most all of them disagree about the fundamental nature of that relationship. There are many cases that prove that people have attempted to impose their believes on others, being in the end punished because thought to be crazy. One of those is Galileo Galilei, he was sure in fact that the sun was not revolving around earth, but instead the earth revolves around the sun. Also the early Greek philosopher Anaxagoras was exiled from Athens because he was saying the moon was a rock. There have been many martyrs that have been punished only because they challenged the infallible wisdom of the rulers in their society. Philosopher are concerned in determine the basis of all knowledge, and agree upon standards in judging these claims. Two famous philosophers argued about this theory, John…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Immanuel Kant

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant believed in utilitarianism, which is the moral philosophy that says we should act in such ways as to make the greatest number of people happy as possible. This is why he introduced the categorical imperative. As a moral law, it is a command that is unqualified and not dependent on any conditions or qualifications. In short, it tells us to act in such a way that we would want everyone else to act the same way.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s philosophical views of human nature and the ethical systems that govern human actions are primarily summed up in his composition of the "Categorical Imperative.” By his own logic, Kant attempted to describe the mechanics of nature and the morality of mankind. As Mitchell states:…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the idea of human nature and reasons; we can indeed perceive a modern philosophy and ethics, by monitoring a reflection of insightful philosophers of Thomas Hobbes and Immanuel Kant. In this regard, however, Hobbes and Kant’s are differing in so many ways as they have entirely different perspective on the issue of morality and pragmatism. This disparity can be viewed, by how Kant's view morality in more of a rationalistic way, while Hobbes being more empirical on the topic of ethics.Therefore, they both took a person-centered approach to a given issue, as Kant’s philosophy is concerned with the moral law an unwritten rule to govern individual actions, yet Hobbes theory emphasis more on ethical egoism, by mentioning human nature based mostly…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant the Sublime

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Lyotard’s reading Lessons on the Analytic of the Sublime, he explains how critical thought exists within an infinite amount of creativity with no principles but in search of them. Lyotard understands the Kantian sublime as a way to comply with the standards that critically analyze postmodernism using deconstruction. Kant differentiated the sublime between the vastness and greatness and the dynamic sublime. The vastness sublime is so great we can’t just use our senses like we normally do; it requires us to heighten our senses beyond comprehension. The dynamic sublime is the way in which rationalizes things and his perceptions.…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Vs Kant

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page

    Article 1 states that “No treaty of peace shall be held valid in which there is a tacitly reserved matter for a future war” because that would essentially be a contract made in bad faith where it is supposedto be signed in good faith, Bona Fides, and would furthermore violate the concept of a “peace treaty” supposed to remove the causes of future wars.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Idealism believes in refined wisdom. It is based on the view that reality is a world within a person's mind. It believes that truth is in the consistency of ideas and that goodness is an ideal state to strive to attain.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8-Idealism: A philosophical concept according to which things, exist only through our thoughts and ideas.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays