Preview

Just War and Pacifism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
932 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just War and Pacifism
Ulzhan Mukasheva
09/11/13
Religious Studies
Just War and Pacifism

(I) Examine the view that some wars can be justified. (21) What is just war? It’s the act of war that must be justified because of the considerable losses which war entails. Pacifism? The pacifist will pursue every other option a prior to resorting to war. War actually has some advantages and can be justified; mainly it establishes peace. It stimulates the economy e.g. weapon development, employment, reparations, rebuilding. War raises consciousness of civil and human rights. It also advances technology and medicine. The Just War theory was developed my Augustine during the 3rd century and Aquinas during 13th century. This theory responded to the need for Christians to fight for the defense of the empire, but without compromising Christian principles, following Constantine’s conversion to Christianity. There are three categories: jus ad bellum (conditions for going to war), jus in bello (conditions during war), and jus post bellum (conditions for ending war). Jus ad bellum has to have a just cause e.g. liberation from oppression, to restore peace, protect the innocent, and self defense. Last resort which means after all peaceful methods of negotiation, sanctions; isolation; have failed. The legitimate authority has to approve e.g. the elected or recognized government of the land; religious authority if appropriate; military government that is the legitimate authority. A just intention should be present, a just outcome as means e.g. not to take a nation’s wealth is the process of lecturing peace. There should be a comparison of justice on both sides; in principle both sides should have a just cause and a just intention. A reasonable likelihood of success, do not commit a nation to an unwinnable war that will lead to increasing suffering. Also, the level of weaponry should be proportionate to the offense e.g. conflict becoming a country for a dispute over trade. Jus in Bello, the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Tim O'Brien on Injustice

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The unclearness and uncertainty of war is something that penetrates deep into life and it is something that affects every facet of every day. Justice is the pursuit of right, the elevation of goodness, and the elimination of evil; however, such lucid definitions often lack substance when stood up to the tests of reality. Injustice is the denial of rights and the lack of morality for the embracement of barbarism. When looking for injustices in the world, what most readily comes to mind are violent crimes? Murder, theft, and rape are domestic injustices commonly recognized, but injustices, like reality, exist in perception. Therefore, to deem someone or something unjust, first agreement upon its definition must be established. When the United States declared her independence, we perceived the unjust indignities to be clear; however, to the militant king, the refusal to pay his taxes was injustice and the nullification of his law was the warrant for war. When such implied meanings come in to play, one has to determine what is just. In order to eliminate war, first all nations must outline the true meaning of “injustice” and find suitable solutions for reparation. The most diligent participant of war is the injustice done upon both sides, the backing of both by god, and the misconception that both will prevail due to their side being right and just. These differing views of injustice and justice are what cause the eventual degradation of war. (JRSOT) Tim O’Brien takes account of the injustices of war when he refers to opposing…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Using this framework, war can only be waged by a sovereign political actor, which the U.S. fulfills due to its position as a nation. The U.S. also fulfills the Right Intention tenet of Jus Ad Bellum since it is fighting a war to restore the peace due to the unpredictable nature of ISIS. Similarly, the fulfills the Just Cause tenet of Jus Ad Bellum since the war would be fought in self-defense and against a known threat to the international system (ISIS). Moreover, the US has tried to avoid direct war with ISIS, but this attack warrants retaliation, thus fulfilling the last resort tenet of Jus Ad Bellum, since war was a last resort. Since the United States can circumscribe the war to specific regions, the damages caused by the war will not outweigh the benefits brought by victory, fulfilling the proportionality tenet of Jus Ad Bellum. Similarly, since the U.S. knows it can defeat ISIS and suppress Assad and thus establish a lasting peace in Syria it fulfills the tenet of creating a lasting peace through the…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    POL.355.Final.Paper

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Just War Theory evolves from three ideas; jus ad bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum. Jus ad bellum means justice for war, that is what the motive behind going into war is? This first part concentrates on the reasons why states use war as a means in which to achieve a justifiable end. Jus in bello means justice in war, deals with the means used in the actual war which is normally the soldiers’ responsibility. The last idea used in just war theory is Jus post bellum which means justice after war; this involves the consequences of war.…

    • 2412 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first three conditions necessary for a just war were listed by Aquinas which included right authority, just cause and just intention. These and…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that they are incompatible as Just War is just trying to make a war seem just by putting in the seven principles but at the end of the day they are just killing. Where as pacifism is a principle against this completely. However, there are four types of pacifism and to an extent you could argue that some of these fit the Just War theory.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Force should be used when there are legitimate reasons for using it, and when it is the last resort for the government, who is responsible for civic peace. Elshtain uses Augustine to discuss justice and war. A paradox between war and peace is introduced, Elshtain uses an Augustine quote to discuss the similarity of two words that are complete polar opposites, “Peace and war had a contest in cruelty, and peace won the prize.” In history, there are many instances where evil and horrible things are done in the name of ‘peace’. Elshtain continues with the early Christian beliefs that under Jesus’ teaches forbid force in anyway, even under authority. Later, it transforms to the necessity of force to protect others. This leads to the four qualifications that Elshtain wrote to justify a war, the first is that the war must be publicly declared by a legitimate jurisdiction. The second criteria is that an unjust violence must have occurred against the government’s own people or a defenseless group. Third, the war has to be start with the proper motives. Finally, all other alternatives must be exhausted before leading to war. In the end, Elshtain includes a final criteria that must be met for a war to be ‘just’, the possibility of actually winning the conflict. If there is no chance of succeeding, the conflict should not be…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to maintain justification for your cause, the State must have the right end goal in mind, because revenge for revenge sake, causes you to become malicious like your adversary if not more so. Moreover, since Aquinas viewed all states ideally as being keepers of peace, if one engages in a just war, the end goal must be to ensure and enable sustainable peace within and between the two nations (Reichberg…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages

    When is war acceptable? That is the question that the Just War theory (jus bellum iustum) attempts to answer. Guided by an evolving set of criteria, this tradition attempts to provide a framework by which the both the reasons for a war and the combatants' behavior may be judged to be ethical and morally justifiable. This theory or doctrine, has roots in both philosophical and historical contexts, having been shaped by conventions and rules observed through ages of war as well as the thoughts of philosophers of those same ages. These principles are divided into two parts: 'the right to go to war' (jus ad bellum), which concerns itself with whether it is justifiable…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just War Pacifism

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Human beings have been fighting with each other since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it. The Ethics of War begins by assuming that war is a bad thing, and should be avoided if possible, but there can be situations when war may be catastrophic. War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong. The purpose of war ethics is to help decide what is right or wrong, both for individuals and countries, and to contribute to debates on public policy, and ultimately to government and individual action.…

    • 2476 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Just War

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The power to wage war is the power to wage war successfully” (Evans Hughes, Charles). In 1846 the United States and Mexico went to war against each other over disagreements mainly regarding the area of Texas. Mexico claimed the war was to protect its territorial integrity while the United States claimed the war was an act of self defense. In the Just War Theory actions and intentions of warring nations are upheld to a standard of justification. This Theory attempts to provide parameters of acceptable behavior when declaring and waging war. It also provides examples of offenses often committed in war. When examining the events leading up to the war, it becomes clear that the United States was acting in accordance with the principles put forth in the Just War Theory. The participation of the United States in the Mexican-American war was just because war was declared as a last resort, the war was fought on behalf of a just cause, and the war was declared by a legitimate authority.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics War

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the just war theory there are two principles which must be followed when a country considers entering a war. The first is the jus ad bellum which defines rules and obligations to be satisfied just before going to war. The first condition states that a country enters a war only if there is a just cause. Mainly, the just causes are protecting innocent life, preserving necessary decent conditions to the humans and also to secure basic human rights. It is justified to defend another nation that is itself the victim of aggression. A war must only be declared by a competent authority entrusted with the common…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article “Just War Tradition” also refer to as Just War Theory is related to war because it explains the principles and morals behind on taking war as a last resort solution only if the options don't meet the requirements. Also, in the case of war was to happen they discussed on when and where warfare is appropriate to be taken place. Including that, the Just War Tradition was originally discovered by the Christians and their based it on their philosophy. Then theorist Saint Augustine made who made other factions to their philosophy for a better outcome. As years passed another theorist named Michael Walzer stepped in but this time around modernize the principles. The government must apply two principles the first principle is Jus ad Bellum…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final

    • 2012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing! Around the World everyday there is some type of war happening. War affect everyone and thousands or even millions die because of war. The problem or issue that I’m going to talk about is why war is morally wrong and can war ever be justified. This Essay will talk about many thing including the three traditions of thought that dominate the ethics of war and peace: Realism; Pacifism; and the Just War Theory. Another thing I’m going to talk about is why war should be understood as an actual intentional and widespread armed conflict between political communities. I’m also going talk where does the church stand on the topic of war. There are lots of debates on war whether it a good thing or an awful thing on the face of the earth. So the controversy behind this topic that some people believe that you can achieve a common good by going to war. By that I mean war help out the economy, For Example in 1930’s The Great Depression was happening and World War II brought jobs that caused The Great Depression to end. The Other group of people believe that going to war is completely wrong, that you will not achieve anything and make the situation worst. For Example, pretend the rebel took out the angry dictator, the country will be unsettled with no government or Constitution. Post World War II, The United Nations (UN) is an intergovernmental organization established 24 October 1945, to promote international co-operation. A replacement for the ineffective League of Nations, the organization was created following the Second World War to prevent another such conflict. Most of the time War violate human rights, For Example in World War Two there was a Jewish Genocide. Acts of genocide violate the most fundamental and broadly accepted principles of human conduct. The World Wars, and the huge losses of life and gross abuses of human rights that took place during them, were a driving force behind the development of modern human…

    • 2012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Just War Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just authority is that you must have a justified reason on why you went to war such as a legitimate political or legal reason on why you went to war . The next guideline on going to a just war is last resort. To be able to go to war, and have a just war it must be the last resort that cold have been taken when all the peaceful options are not working. For a war to be considered a just war you must have legitmate authority meaning that you must have authority from the government, not an outside individual or group to be able to be considered a just war. You must have good intentions on why you are going to war. The main objective of a just war must be to re-establish peace or order enable for it to be considered a just war. You must have a probability of success, you cannot enter the war with hopelessness and no chanch of success. You must have Proportionality for the war for the war to consider an just war. The nations involved in the war must avoid disproportionate military action and only use the amount of force absolutely necessary. The last thing you must have in a just war is Civilian Casualties. You must be able to distinguish between the militia and…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics