Preview

Just Desserts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
895 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just Desserts
Just Deserts The very meaning of "just deserts" means just that; a reward or punishment in turn for a deed good or bad. In this response, the criminal acts and the punishment, or lack of is what the discussion will be about. For centuries there have been criminals and when caught, these criminals have had some form of punishment. As the world has progressed, in many countries the punishment no longer fits the crime. "Upon a pillory - that al the world may see, a just desert for such impiety."( www.phrases.org.uk) This is an old English phrase, origin unknown, from around 1599. Just desserts means a person receive reasonable consequences for your actions. Is our justice system set up to give reasonable consequences? It depends on the crime, in some states a drug dealer gets more time in prison than does a child molester or rapist. Just desert in this case should be that the sex offenders be sterilized then spend the next 50 years in the shoe with a 400 pound homosexual predator. What must be considered is whose motivation is it to punish those who break the law. I for one can understand the need to punish someone for their actions but what if the individual is mentally challenged and not aware of the repercussions of his or her actions? This is a small percentage of offenders, but if the person is clinically proven incompetent should the punishment fit the crime? That is a hard call to make and I would be hard pressed to make a decision in a case like that. The death penalty is the only penalty for any person who willfully takes the life of any other human being. There are those that oppose the death penalty, and in very few cases of mental illness I can see their point. Amnesty International is one of those organizations who coddle serious offenders like murderers and sexual predators, this is some of their rhetoric: "Horace Dinkins Jr. was electrocuted in Alabama on July 14, 1989. He had an IQ of 69". (Carmichael,1996) What is not stated is who gave this


References: Carmichael, April.1996 The Mercury Oregon should 'just say no ' to the death penalty / Retrieved 3 August 2006 from jcomm.uoregon.edu/~workshop/aprilcol.html "Upon a pillory Retrieved August 2006 from www.phrases.org.uk Petrito, Ronald Crime and Punishment Retrieved 3 August 2006 from www.ashbrook.org/about/staff/pestritto.html Strossen, Nadine ACLU Retrieved 3 August 2006 from www.november.org/razorwire

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In this paper, the authors examine how the death penalty argument has changed in the last 25 years in the United States. They examine six specific issues: deterrence, incapacitation, caprice and bias, cost innocence and retribution; and how public opinion has change regarding these issues. They argue that social science research is changing the way Americans view the death penalty and suggest that Americans are moving toward an eventual abolition of the death penalty.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “The Problem of Punishment,” David Boonin argues that there is no good justification for punishment. He uses the term “punishment” in place of “legal punishment.” According to Boonin (2008), punishment is “authorized reprobative retributive intentional harm” (p. 23). Punishment has to entail intentional harm, which intentionally makes the offender “worse off than she otherwise would be” (Boonin, 2008, p. 7). Also, punishment must be imposed by an authorized agent of the state in order to be legal. It must be reprobative and retributive, because it is necessary to express disapproval toward the illegal offense while only harming the person or people who committed it. It does not qualify as punishment if the punishment inflicted upon an offender…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Punishment, a necessary evil, is sometimes required to deter law violators from repeating their crime and to serve as an example to others who would also violate the law.” (Schmalleger. 2011. P.81)…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this essay i have addressed the issue of whether more states should enforce the death penalty. I have i have concentrated on ornellas argument, which concludes that the death penalty should be enforced by more states. I have stated both of her premises, which she uses to support her conclusion, and how they suffer from fallacies. I have concluded that her premises are unsuccessful in supporting the conclusion; therefore, making her entire argument unsuccessful. Lastly, i have provided an objection on Ornellas part, and showed how that was unsuccessful as…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just-Deserts Era (1995- present). This era focuses on the retribution and punishment of offenders and supports the ware-housing of the prisoners. There is little concern for rehabilitation and emphasis is on the determinate and mandatory sentencing, three strikes laws, and the death penalty (Schmalleger, 2010).…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furman V. Georgia

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The main argument in this article is that the Supreme Court has failed in their duties to regulate the death penalty. This purported failure is attributed to the Supreme Court not following their own terms and their high-profile involvement in overseeing state and federal death penalty practices (Steiker & Steiker, 1998). The authors argue that the Court’s high profile involvement is in fact creating a “False but powerful impression that the death penalty practices have, in fact, been meaningfully transformed” (Steiker & Steiker, 1998, para. 4).…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    I understand the guilty offender to be blameworthy and that desert theories in criminal justice are premised on notions of individual blameworthiness. Within the criminal law this is historically referred to as the mens rea requirement. An agent has the mental state of purpose with respect to a conduct if and only if the agent intends to engage in the conduct and understands its nature. Having a guilty mind means that the criminal knows certain things and chose (or failed to choose) certain things. The problem with proportionality is that it doesn’t properly attend to mens rea: meting out punishment proportionately leaves out differences in mens rea.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Purpose and History

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Let’s first begin with what punishment means. Punishment is the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offense. While completing my research I was able to stumble across two definitions that caught my attention. The general definition for punishment is “aversive stimulus that follows an undesirable behavior, and is intended to decrease or eliminate the occurrence of that behavior. It may be triggered either due to the performance of an undesirable act (negligence) or the non-performance of a desirable act (disobedience). Punishments take the form of presentation of an unpleasant stimulus (criticism or warning) or withdrawal of a pleasant one (employment or promotion). Threat of punishment usually also constitutes a punishment”. The definition of punishment pertaining to the law is “Confinement, fine, penalty, sanction, or loss of a privilege, property, or right, assessed and administered as deterrence or retribution by an authorized court to an entity duly convicted of violating the law of the land”. [ (Buisness Dictionary, 2013) ] Punishments must be adequate match the reasons why the crimes were committed. History shows that Cesare Beccarua who was an Italian theorist, first suggested linking crime causation to punishments in the eighteenth century. He is known as the founder of the Classical School of criminology. The classical School is the theory linking crime causation to punishment, based on offenders’ free will and…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Severely mentally ill individuals may commit horrific crimes. Many believe that these crimes deserve the death penalty; however, others believe that in certain circumstances the mentally ill should be exempt from capital punishment and believe that the punishment is too extreme for those who are not fully aware of committing their crimes. Many mentally ill individuals have been executed and some are currently on death row. All the while, this controversial issue is still being debated on.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Retribution is the theory that the mandate to pay an offender back for his or her wrongdoing (pg. 6 Cullen). Conservatives lean in favor of this approach while liberals favor what is called “just deserts.” The difference between the two is that retribution is has the goal of ensuring that the offender endures the pain they have caused. Just desert want the offender to suffer no more than the pain caused. They wish to see that justice is served but not more than that which is truly deserved. One punishment that is considered retribution rather than rehabilitative is the death penalty. The argument that this punishment is more retribution is that the offender should suffer the same harm to which his or her inflicted on the victim. They see the…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    ProCon.Org. (2009, January 1). Should the death penalty be used for retribution? Retrieved October 24, 2011, from http://deathpenatly.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001004: http://deathpenatly.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001004…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice History

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Medical Model replaces with Justice Model stating crime is a product of adaptation to societal conditions and free will not disease or poor environments. Two or more D’s were added to juvenile justice Deterrence specific and general; deserts youth should get their deserts which means they should get what they deserve.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This article provides applicable information from many sources such as a Governors, Political Science Professors, the Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center as well as the President of the United States, providing legitimacy to the…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays