Julius Caesar Idealism v Realism Essay
Why do honorable people end up with a downfall for their achievements? William Shakespeare with his knowledge of human nature shows Brutus and Cassius’s behaviors as idealistic and realistic in one of his most tragic plays Julius Caesar. The main theme Shakespeare uses in the play is idealism v realism. Julius Caesar the new king of Rome possesses too much power; therefore, Cassius with his realistic views tries to lead people of Rome to decease Caesar’s leadership. Brutus, a good friend of Caesar, wants the welfare for Rome; however, the conspirators persuade Brutus to their site against powerful Caesar. Shakespeare shows several examples of Brutus being idealistic and Cassius very realistic. The example of Brutus’s idealistic side is when he declines to swear an oath. Another one is when Cassius wants to kill Antony but Brutus refuses because in his mind it is too bloody. The third mistake Brutus has done by letting Antony to speak on Caesar’s funeral. In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Shakespeare uses Brutus to show his readers that a tragic flaw can lead to a downfall.
The first conflict between Brutus and Cassius is when Brutus rejects to swear an oath. Cassius with his realistic views proposes “And let us swear our resolution” (2.1.124). Cassius wants to swear an oath to make conspirators stay true one to another and to be bound to silence by an oath. Brutus with his idealism thinks differently. He wants to believe that their plot is not about taking Caesar’s power but to serve Rome. Brutus shows himself as an idealistic person by saying: No, not an oath. If not the face of men,
The sufferance of our souls, the time’s abuse-
If these be motives weak, break off betimes,
And every man hence to his idle bed. (2.1.125-128) By refusing swearing an oath Brutus shows his idealistic personality even if that totally goes against his believes what is honorable for Rome. This...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document