Preview

Judicial Precedent in the United Kingdom

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2119 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Judicial Precedent in the United Kingdom
University of London

Common Law Reasoning and Institutions

Essay Title: ‘Judicial precedent is best understood as a practice of the courts and not as a set of binding rules. As a practice it could be refined or changed by the courts as they wish.’ Discuss

Judicial precedent is a judgment or decision of a court which is used as an authority for reaching the same decision in subsequent cases. In English law, judgment and decisions can represent authoritative precedent (which is generally binding and must be followed) or persuasive precedent (which need not be followed). It is part of the judgment that represents the legal reasoning or ratio decidendi of a case that is binding, but only if the legal reasoning is from a superior court, and in general, from the same court in an earlier case. Accordingly, ratio decidendis of the House of Lords are binding upon the Court of Appeal and all lower courts and are normally followed by the House of Lords itself.

The doctrine of judicial Precedent did not become fully established until the second half of the nineteenth century. Until 1898 the House of Lords had the power to overrule it’s own previous decisions. One important and distinctive element of the English law is that the reasoning and decisions found in preceding cases were not simply considered as a guide. They could be considered binding on later courts. This is known as stare decisis (let the decision stand). This means that when a court makes a decision in a case, then any court, which is of equal or lower status to that court, must follow the previous decision if the case before them is similar to that of the earlier case. Thus, once a court as decided on a matter other inferior courts are bound to follow the decision. Once a point of law has been decided in a particular case, that law must applied in all future cases containing the same material facts. For example, in the case of Donughue v Stevenson (1932)



Bibliography: Elliot, Catherine, Quinn Frances. English Legal System. London: Pearson Education Limited. 2010. Geary, Adam, Morrison, Wayne, Jago, Robert. The Politics of the Common Law: Perspective, Rights, Processes, Institutions. London: Routledge-Cavendish. 2009. Holland, James, Webb, Julian. Learning Legal Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010. Martin, Elizabeth A., Law, Jonathan (eds.). A Dictionary of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2006. Slapper, Gary, Kelly, David. Q&A English Legal System 2007-2008. London: Routledge-Cavendish. 2007 Sixth Form Law, ‘Mechanics of Precedents - The Denning Story’ http://sixthformlaw.info/01_modules/mod2/2_1_1_precedent_mechanics/09_precedent_denning.htm accessed April 24, 2011 Smith, Rowan, ‘The Doctrine of Judicial Precedent (Case Law)’ http://learningat.ke7.org.uk/socialsciences/5thlesson/Law/The%20Doctrine%20of%20Judicial%20Precedent%20-student.htm accessed April 21, 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Creation of U.S. Laws

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thorpe, M. (2012). U.S. Law and the History of English Common Law. Retrieved from http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/CommonLaw.htm…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: The English Legal System – 9th Edition (2008/2009) by Catherine Elliot and Frances Quinn…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Doctrine of Precedent is a legal term to describe the practice where decisions established in previous Court rulings are legally binding on future cases which have similar circumstances and facts and must be followed. Rulings issued from a Court are binding on that level of Court and lower Courts as the court system follows a hierarchy. The binding force of the precedent depends on the hierarchy of courts, some courts have greater authority than others, a decision made by a court in the superior court will be binding on all other courts, this is the principle behind the doctrine The doctrine of precedent is in the common law system of rights and duties. The courts are bound, within prescribed limits, by prior decisions of superior courts.…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Let's say that a Court establishes that it is illegal for people to smoke or be in possession of Tobacco. The Court has clearly explained, in its decision, why it is illegal according to law to smoke Tobacco. This is Case A.Now, someone is arrested for smoking Tobacco, and is tried in Court for breach of this new law. The Judges in this case, in order to explain why they are holding the person guilty, will refer to Case A, which put down the principles concerning this offence. Case A thus becomes a precedent.A precedent is usually a decision which is so important and so well explained that it clears the fog surrounding certain issues and, in so doing, guides Courts in the future, whenever any dispute arises concerning those issues.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Precedents are a past case that is used as an example or as guidance as it has similar facts and circumstances. There are 3 types of Precedents; Original, Binding and Persuasive. They can be used instead of statutory laws in civil cases. They are created when a new case, which has never been trialled in the UK courts. An example of this was the London bombings in 2005. The rulings for this trial will now be applied to future cases, similar to this. Judges look at a previous case, which is similar and in an equal or higher court and they will then use this information to decide…

    • 1917 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Search Powers

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Slapper, Gary, and David Kelly. The English Legal System Thirteenth Edition 2012-2013. Oxon: Routledge, 2012.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, using the common law tradition, courts will hear disputes that are brought before them. In doing so, courts consider themselves bound by how other courts of superior standing have previously interpreted a law. This is known as the principle of stare decisis, or simply precedent. Precedent helps to ensure consistency and predictability in the administration of justice with in the legal system.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The theory of legal precedent has changed the face of the Criminal Justice System and Criminal Courts in many ways. Previously judges made decisions solely on what they believed, without mentioning existing cases. The decisions were only base on what they were told about the pending case, and with that information they provided a suitable conclusion. Today judges base their decisions on previous cases, to be able to justify their actions. Legal precedent is extremely beneficial to our Criminal justice system and our court system because it allows consistency, reliability and predictability within our decisions.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R Wacks, Understanding Jurisprudence, An Introduction to Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn 2009)…

    • 3997 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    But in unwritten laws, a role that a judge plays in will be in terms of case laws in which it is not locked into any statute but instead judgements that the courts have delivered. And once a case has been decided, future cases with similar fact scenarios will be bound by the earlier decision if the earlier decision is made by a higher court in the same hierarchy or a decision made from the court’s previous decision which will be the doctrine of stare decisis. Thus, a “judge-made law” on a case by case basis.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial precedent in its broad definition is the process by which judges follow previously decided cases to aid in their decision providing that the facts are sufficiently similar. The doctrine of judicial precedent seeks to provide consistency and predictability in law by virtue of the application of the principle of stare decisis which means to stand by the decided. Through the application of this maxim, judicial precedent ensures inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles which were set down in the decisions made by superior courts. The decision of a judge may fall into two parts, ratio decidendi and obiter dictum. The ratio decidendi is the reason for the decision and it is the principle of law on which a particular decision is made. When a judge has come to a decision he outlines the facts which he finds has been proved on evidence, he then applies the laws to those facts and arrives at his decision for which he gives a reason; this reason is the ratio decidendi. Therefore it is important to note that, it is not necessarily the decision which is of utmost importance in judicial precedence but the reason for arriving at the decision. The ratio decinidi is not as clear cut as it sounds though as there are a number of instances where the ruling judge does not explicitly say what the ratio decidendi is and it is sometimes left for a later judge to determine and this is an issue in and of itself as there maybe disagreements as to what the reason actually is. The obiter dictum on the other hand is speculation so to speak. This is where…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Precedent is the way that English Common Law has evolved since the time of Henry II when courts were unified into a national system, making it common throughout England. Integral to it is the Latin phrase ‘stare decisis’ which literally means ‘to stand by what has been decided’. Its meaning in the case of judicial precedent is very similar, that a Judge will go by the same ruling as a previous judge has in the same cases; providing that the precedent comes from a higher or equal court, if it is from a lower court then the precedent is only considered, but may be used. It should be noted that this was not categorically announced by judges until the 19th Century.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In English law it is normally made by the decision of a higher court, for example, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, which assumed control over the legal elements of the House of Lords in 2009. “Binding precedent relies on the legal principle of stare decisis. A stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It ensures certainty and consistency in the application of law. Existing binding precedents from past cases are applied in principle to new situations by analogy.” There are three components required for a point of precedent to work. First one is that an effective arrangement of law reporting must be accepted by the courts. There must be some balance legal certainty which results into bindness effect of the previous decisions.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicial precedent - Law

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judicial precedent is based upon the Latin maxim "stare decisis" which loosely translates into "stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established". Judicial precedent is the source of law where past decisions of the judges create law for future judges to follow, this law can be found in judgement that is binding. Ratio Decidendi is the part of the judgement that is binding. In the English legal system, higher courts bind lower courts so lower courts have to follow the past decisions of the higher courts. For example, the Supreme Court binds the court of appeal. Ratio Decidendi loosely translates as "the reason for deciding". It was described by Michael Zander as "a proposition of law which decides the case in the context of the material facts". When the binding precedent has been formed lower courts have no other choice but to follow it even if the outcome of the case can seem harsh or injustice. This is illustrated when the decision of the House of lord in Caldwell was bound on the decision by the Divisional court in Elliot v C.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    precedent

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The lowest court of law in England and Wales, which deals with less serious crimes, is the Magistrates’ Court. The courts just above a Magistrates’ Court are County Courts and Crown Courts. Positioned higher in the hierarchy is the High Court. Any parties not satisfied with a decision made by the High Court may lodge an application for leave to appeal with the Court of Appeal. The court of last resort and the highest appellate court is the Supreme Court (formerly, the House of Lords ). Decisions in the higher courts bind the lower courts. In common law legal systems, a precedent is established in a previous legal case that is either binding on or persuasive for a court or other tribunal when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts. This is called “stare decisis” or let the decision stand. It provides at least some degree of certainty. This doctrine of precedent applies to all courts including the court of appeal, whose decisions bind all lower courts. The court is also bound by its own previous decisions except in the case of two conflicting Court of Appeal decisions or a later House of Lords decision or per incuriam (Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd). Until 1966, the House of Lords in the United Kingdom was bound to follow all of its previous decisions under the principle of stare decisis, even if this may create "injustice" and "unduly restrict the proper development of the law". This principle is adopted by conservative judges like Lord Simonds. Their rationale is that judges are…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays