A Brief Overview of President Bush’s Presidential Nominations
An analysis of the judicial nominations made by President W. Bush shows a significant belief of the president in the power of persuasion rather than depending on the expertise of institutions (Wroe, 2009). The total disregard of the American Bar Association (ABA) role in the process shows that the President was more comfortable nominating judges who would be loyal and easy to persuade. Apparently Bush was avoiding delays that could have been caused by liberal judges when it came to implementing the policies of his administration. Bush used the same strategy that had been used by President Regan who had a reputation of being highly conservative and nominating conservative judges to the judiciary (Biskupic, 2008). The role of the judiciary is the interpretation of the American constitution and a president would only risk having his policies rejected when he has judges with different ideologies in his judiciary (Ward, 2005). President Bush failed to involve the ABA, because such a move could have delayed the process and perhaps limiting the president to judges that he did not prefer. However, President Bush decided to consult with lawyers who had been on Regan’s conservative team to provide the professional advice with regard to the nominations. President Bush might have been very certain that he would run for a second term and win. The President was therefore determined to leave a long term legacy by nominating judges to the judiciary who would have an influence even after the end of his second term. Judges like “Antonin Scalia, 72, and Anthony Kennedy, 71” (Biskupic, 2008) appointed by Regan are still going strong ensuring that the legacy of President Regan will be there for a long time. President Bush’s objective seemed to be the same as Regan’s in terms of leaving a lasting legacy in the American judicial system and consequently judicial ideologies.
References
Biskupic, J. (2008, March 14). Bush 's Conservatism to Live Long in the U.S. Courts. Retrieved February 6, 2011, from USA Today: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-03-13-judges_N.htm
Ward, K. D. & Rodriguez, C. (Eds.). (2005). The Judiciary and American Democracy: Alexander Bickel, the Contermajoritan Difficulty and the Contemporary Constitutional Theory. New York: New York State University Press.
Wroe, A. & Herbert, J. (Eds.). (2009). Assessing the George W. Bush Presidency: A Tale of Two Terms. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
References: Biskupic, J. (2008, March 14). Bush 's Conservatism to Live Long in the U.S. Courts. Retrieved February 6, 2011, from USA Today: http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-03-13-judges_N.htm Ward, K. D. & Rodriguez, C. (Eds.). (2005). The Judiciary and American Democracy: Alexander Bickel, the Contermajoritan Difficulty and the Contemporary Constitutional Theory. New York: New York State University Press. Wroe, A. & Herbert, J. (Eds.). (2009). Assessing the George W. Bush Presidency: A Tale of Two Terms. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…
- 968 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Kathleen Parker gives her judgment on newly appointed supreme court justice Neil Gorsuch. Her purpose is to denounce the ‘left wing’ slander of this new ‘right wing’ judge. Parker states facts and gives reasoning to show why we should feel secure about Trump’s appointee. In the article, Kathleen Parker using contradicting descriptions of Neil Gorsuch to display his true characteristics. When recalling the Democrats reaction to Neil Gorsuch, Parker says they painted Gorsuch as a ‘cruel and bloodless beast who shrinks from the light and plays havoc with history.’ However, contrasting this view are Gorsuch true characteristics; a man who is ‘courageous in protecting the people and the constitution by adhering to the text and original intent without…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
References: Barone, M. & McCutchen, C. (2011). Almanac of American Politics 2012. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.…
- 2051 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
At no time in this century was the devotion to that principle more vigorously evoked than in 1937, when Franklin Roosevelt introduced a plan to increase the number of Justices on the Supreme Court. The conflict set off by the President's plan is more understandable when viewed in the historical context of expanding judicial power as well as in the contemporary context of pro- and anti-New Deal politics.…
- 325 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
1. The state of Florida is amongst 16 other states that selects judges through the method “appointment-retention election”. A method in which a proposing group shows names to the governor, who then makes the appointment; appointees need to win a retention vote in the next election. It is not necessarily a good system because the selection is placed in the hands of the judges or attorneys who comprise the nominating committee and the governor, with only a impression of voter input. Reorganizers argue that the plan eliminate judges from politics and saves the electorate the problem of voting on judicial candidates when they know little about their professional qualifications.…
- 318 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In this essay, Tribe and Dorf describe our nation’s Constitution as a document that continues to dynamically work to achieve a balance between governmental power and individual liberty. Founding fathers like Madison and Jefferson also look to the constitution as a distinct outline, instead of a blueprint. The amendments and bills that comprise it tend to be very vague and open to interpretation of what some definitions actually mean. This leads to a lot of disputes throughout history of what the Constitution and its words stand for.…
- 436 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Notably, it is crucial to understand that within the state of Texas, the Supreme Court, the court of criminal appeals and other district courts offer vacancies for judges whose practice of law is meant to resolve any conflict that arises in due course (Mott, 49). It is a constitutional requirement for the selection of nine judges of the Supreme Court, nine justices to preside over the court of criminal appeals and an additional 80 judges who fill the various courts of appeal across the state of Texas (Hansberger, 121). Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the Texas is counted among the two members of the union that takes part in the partisan election and re-election of judges in which case the voters have an option of casting a straight-ticket…
- 1669 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
“Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.”…
- 334 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Lasser, W. The limits of judicial power the Supreme Court in American Politics. Chapel Hill: North Carolina Press, 1988.…
- 1766 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Joan Biskupic’s novel In American Original: The Life and Constitution of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, describes Scalia’s success as an influential conservative force in the Supreme Court, which conservative lawyer, Alfred S. Regnery, bolsters, expanding on William Rehnquist’s role in establishing the groundwork allowed for a major a shift towards right in courts, in The American Spectator article, “The Good Old Days”. Regnery begins by establishing he agrees with Biskupic’s assertions that Scalia has been the “most influential member”: “changing the terms of the debate at the Court” and influencing many. Regnery, however, submits that although the degree of Scalia’s achievements hadn’t been accomplished before, Rehnquist, in fact…
- 448 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States is democratic republic where the three branches of government each has its'…
- 1946 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The subject of recusal is not the most studied issue either. Much of the literature available and some used here is related to recusal but not necessarily the primary focus. It is still relevant and clearly connects though, and this study will illustrate that. For example, much of the history and background of the study is the same for a variety of subjects written about the Supreme Court. Terms of Engagement by Clark M. Neilly III claims that the Supreme Court’s actions restrict the constitutional theory of limited government.…
- 1416 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…
- 1001 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Justices of the United States Supreme Court are strategic actors who strive to secure policy outcomes as close to their preferred outcome as possible. Accomplishing this sometimes requires justices to not always pursue their true policy preferences and sometimes it requires justices to ignore legal and policy questions. In this essay, I will analyze how justices were strategic in a few landmark supreme court cases.…
- 1622 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the primary foundations for the power which it exercises over the American judicial system is the basics of judicial review. This power consists of the ability of the Supreme Court to decide upon “review” that a piece of some form of Government action is not permitted under the Constitution and can be deemed “unconstitutional”. The Supreme Court established this idea early in its existence and was empowered as a vital institution in the American Government primarily by exercising it. Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and the validity of laws affecting the population. Judicial review should be void of all political favoring, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.…
- 473 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays