Preview

John Stuart Mill: The Dangers Of Intuitionism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
310 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Stuart Mill: The Dangers Of Intuitionism
knowledge,” (CW, I.233) or, as he also calls it, “intuitionism,” which was espoused in different ways by Kant, Reid, and their followers in Britain (e.g. Whewell and Hamilton). Though there are many differences among intuitionist thinkers, one “grand doctrine” that Mill suggests they all affirm is the view that “the constitution of the mind is the key to the constitution of external nature—that the laws of the human intellect have a necessary correspondence with the objective laws of the universe, such that these may be inferred from those.” (CW, XI.343). The intuitionist doctrine conceives of nature as being largely or wholly constituted by the mind rather than more or less imperfectly observed by it. One of the great dangers presented by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another theorist, John Stewart Mill (1869) also had similar views and ideas to Wollstonecraft ,and Wheeler, and suggests that “women need to become equal to men legally in order that they became equal socially” (Michelle, 2005). This statement is similar to the other theorist’s ideas in the late eighteenth century, and expresses a common interest for change in society. Mill outlines that gender inequality should not exist in society, as “men and women are natural equals and have the same natural rights”, so women should be disregarded in society, based on their gender (Michelle, 2005). Overall Wollstonecraft, Wheeler, and Mill, all share similar views towards gender inequality and expresses the need for change in society to be compatible with…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Intuition – Is the idea that principles of right and wrong have been built into a person’s conscience and the he or she will know what is right by listening to that “little voice “within.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With rule utilitarianism you first have to agree to the general rule then after you apply it to specific cases.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Through democratization a political culture arises that opens the doors to all who wish to participate but it is your duty to willingly offer up your opinions on how we should be governed. John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor Mill address the great opportunities that emerge and challenge the customs that hold us back.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From John Stuart Mill’s perspective, Mill can perceive this controversy in a few ways, but for the sake of this argument, we will focus on his main idea of liberalism to further critique Harper’s assertions. Mill’s principle of liberalism can be seen with dealings of society as the sole end for which mankind is authorized, as individuals and collectively, to not interfere with the liberty of action of their fellow citizens, and to subject themselves to the law in order for this protections, which is exercised through coercion and fear. In Mill’s perspective, religion and religious clothing is acceptable insofar that it doesn’t harm another person or the state, morally and physically. But to Harper this can be seen as harm to the values of…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What part does happiness play in determining the morality of an act in a situation? Can a concept that ties morality to the search of happiness truly be rational? What of the opposite? Is it possible to view every situation with objectivity, never taking into account an emotion (like happiness)? The questions above concern themselves with the part of the central tenets of the ethical views of two very important philosophers, respectfully: John Mill and Immanuel Kant. The ethical theories that these two philosophers laid out clash with each other in fundamental ways, from how reason was defined, to the role that “happiness” played in determining the ethical choice in a moral dilemma. In the following pages, I will attempt to present and discuss the theories of Kant and Mill, pointing out what I perceive as weakness in said theories, as well as the possible strengths of each system.…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Define the sociological perspective or imagination, cite its components, and explain how they were defended by C. Wright Mills.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Derk Pereboom offers a "hard incompatibilism" that makes both free will as well as moral responsibility incompatible with determinism, John Stuart Mill thinks the opposite. One of the main distinctions that he is making herein is that civil or social liberty entail about the nature as well as limits of power upon which can be legitimately be part of the community or than can be exercised by an individual or society (Pereboom, 2014). In his part John Stuart Mill argues that; social liberty may be related with “hard determinism” however this does not mean that determinism is true. John Stuart Mill categorically states that determinism is not incompatible with moral responsibility (Pereboom, 2014).…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When you look at torture and the idea of torture you also have to look at what both a just and unjust act is. Both Aristotle and Mill discuss justice and injustice along with just and unjust acts. So in order to determine if it is ever permissible to torture another person according to Mill and Aristotle, you have to first look at both of their definitions of justice and if the act is just or unjust.…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Striving towards the achievement of happiness is what most people do, they make it their one most admired goal in life. John Stuart Mill, in Chapter V “A Crisis in My Mental Health. One Stage Onward.” of his autobiography, claims that if we yearn for happiness and make it our ultimate goal, it will automatically become unachievable. If we divert our attention toward something other than our own happiness, achieving it will become effortless. The journey through the enjoyments of life are what gives us happiness, but if we make it our goal we have failed.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    intuitions act in their natural way. Nature is everything that humanity is constructed out of and…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Two conclusions emerge fairly decisively from the cursory analysis presented above: first, that the doctor should not even consider performing the sperm retrieval procedure before Mr. M is medically diagnosed as brain dead; and second, that even then he ought to consider it only if the mother were to provide specific proof not only of Mr. M's prior consent to undergo the procedure, but also of his intent to transfer the harvested sperm into his mother's possession for the purposes of selecting an inseminating a surrogate on his behalf in the event of his death.…

    • 1631 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism, Mill discusses the concept of utilitarianism, defined as, “The doctrine that actions are right if they are useful of for the benefit of a majority.” Mill elaborates on this idea and within the second chapter of his essay, addresses many misconceptions towards this view. Addressing the given quote, one misconception made is that utilitarianism degrades the meaning of life. Some people oppose this view because they think that it is wrong to say that there is no better end than pleasure and freedom from pain. Mill replies to this by saying that there are different qualities of pleasure. He professes about a higher quality pleasure being one which you would choose above another pleasure even if it meant pain…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Research Method

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “If we ignore supernatural inspiration, intuition is based on two things: experience and intelligence. The more experience I have with you, the more likely I am to encounter repetition of activities and situations that help me learn about you. The smarter I am, the more I can abstract from those experiences to find connections and patterns among them.”…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays