Preview

John Rawls Theory Of Liberalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
937 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
John Rawls Theory Of Liberalism
Justice as Fairness John Rawls responds to the question of justice with his own theory of Liberalism. Liberalism utilizes a social contract as a conceptual basis from which moral reasoning can be considered just. Rawls claims that the best way to look at morality is by referring to the principles, which govern society, based on an initial situation of equality. He explains this initial situation of equality by proposing a hypothetical original position: “The guiding idea is that the principles of justice for the basic structure of society are the objet of an original agreement. They are the principles that free and rational persons would accept in an initial situation of equality as defining the fundamental terms of their association” (Rawls, 204). This original situation is distinguished by a veil of ignorance under which individual bias is removed due to the unawareness of one’s future position in society. The purpose of the original situation is to determine the principles of justice that would result from people free from the distinctions of society. Rawls uses the principles of moral justification that are established from this original position to create a procedural form of justice. In establishing this theory of “justice as fairness”, Rawls focuses on two key principles. The first principle refers to the importance of the protection of basic liberties. Rawls believes that the security liberties will be essential to those present in the original position because they are self-interest individuals. The uncertainty of one’s future holdings and position within society is a determinant of the safeguard of these liberties. Whether one will be placed in the top class or be less fortunate is undetermined. Therefore, Rawls claims that by human nature, precaution will be taken to ensure that liberties are distributed equally. This working principle of society ensures that the liberties of individuals will not be compromised. The second principle that Rawls claims

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of justice are also referred to in the article. These theories utilize concepts by John Rawls which include ideas on how to “create an environment of opportunity and access by all to the most comprehensive range of prospects” (Colin, 2012, p. 444). This theory can lead to a society where individuals are given opportunities to succeed.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A just society should be one that leads to progression and protects an individual's rights and freedoms. In this paper I will take Rawls position that we would create a more just society by creating a minimum standard of living for everyone. One of the main points presented in Nozick’s theory is that redistribution is wrong because it is unjust to steal resources that were justly earned from one person and to give it to someone else. In principle Nozick is correct that redistribution is unjust in the sense that we are taking resources from one person to give to another, however, Nozick’s view doesn’t account for the fact that people aren’t born with equal opportunity so without redistribution it results in a hierarchy that keeps increasing.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximizing Welfare Essay

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    People always sway the limitations of freedom for personal gain. “The idea that justice means respecting freedom and individual rights” has been tossed about in our courts and communities tirelessly. Part of the basis of the United States is freedom; the bill of rights lists ways in which the government must respect people’s most basic freedoms. Sandel talks about two different camps, the laissez-faire camp and the fairness camp, each arguing for freedoms but in their own way. The laissez-faire camp doesn’t believe in government or community policies, but in each person’s voluntary choices. However, the fairness camp believes “justice requires policies that remedy social and economic disadvantages” which in turn will give everyone a shot. An example of moral judgment and freedom is the first amendment in the Bill of Rights. Everyone is granted the freedom to talk about whatever they please, whether it upsets other or not. In certain situations although a right some things should not be said and knowing that difference takes moral judgment.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawls had these two ideas. One idea was that all should be equal. All should have the same rights. The second idea was if there are any inequalities, everyone should benefit from them in the society. Still to this day, philosophers stand with these ideas of Rawls.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls, using Kantian rationality, discusses ways to determine principles of social justice. He begins by making a clear distinction as to what defines the social justice used in his argument – “the way in which the major social institutions distribute fundamental rights and duties and determine the division of advantages from social cooperation”. Rawls then continues to introduce concepts such as the original position which pertains to the thought experiment he calls the veil of ignorance – the original position is a hypothetical state where members of society decide what the principles of justice are. To find the original position, the members must use the veil of ignorance in the sense of having ignorance toward class, intelligence, strength, and things alike, in order to prevent bias and in turn create a fair choice. With this in mind, Rawls sets forth to disprove utilitarianism within justice. He claims that utilitarianism is unjust for it does not respect the rights and liberties of all individuals - if slavery was beneficial to the majority, using utilitarianism logic, some would claim it is just. Rawls argues for the equality of rights; inequalities are justified only if they benefit the society as a whole. He makes a key distinction between the benefit of the majority, and the advantage of all.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Vs Nozick

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Regarding justice in a society, both John Rawls and Robert Nozick express differing opinions on the best way to reach this. Both philosophers illustrate what they feel justice to be and offer support for their ideas in their efforts to put forth the best argument. Before being able to decide on which argument is the strongest, it is best to understand the ideas each philosopher possesses in order to compare and contrast them.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the founding fathers began to draft their Declaration of Independence, the idea of equality was at the forefront and they clearly stated how “all men are created equal.” Yet, as the years went on and the nation that was founded by dissenters grew, so did their demographics. The United Sates government today is faced with years of racial, gender and class discrimination, and while they government seeks to protect equality, the nation is not egalitarian. Political theorist John Rawls, in his work, The Law of Peoples, discusses the formal, background and redistributive senses of equality and that the outcome of working with the Law of Peoples in a liberal…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory of Justice

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In A Theory of Justice, Rawls begins with the statement that, ‘‘Justice is the first virtue of social institution,’’ meaning that a good society is one structured according to principals of justice (1998). John Rawls states that when a person is covered in the veil of ignorance, a society without his/her own status known must begin in that society. They must provide a place that they could relate to for someday they may have bad luck and end up as a person on the lowest end of the ladder in society. This is one way to have a just and fair society for all to live. A place where status does not matter and no one would ever feel bad for the situation they are in.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Veil Of Ignorance

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page

    The role of the "veil of ignorance” plays in Rawls' theory of distributive justice is by eliminating bias in society making a fair way of choosing principles (Shaw & Barry, 2016). The veil is put in place so individuals from the original position would make a just decision knowing nothing of their self and their natural abilities, or their position in society. In addition the individual would know nothing of their sex, race, nationality, or individual tastes when making a decision (Shaw & Barry, 2016). Therefore, no one is at an advantage or disadvantage when making up principles in society.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The issue of distributive justice is relevant in our society due to current thoughts on economic inequality in politics. The political philosophers John Rawls and Robert Nozick have differing views when it comes to the topic of distributive justice. This analyze the positions of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, finding that Nozick’s view of distribution is preferable to Rawls’ difference principle because people deserve to keep what they earn and their earnings should not be taken away from them because that would be a violation of their personal liberties.…

    • 1823 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Vs Nozick

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both John Rawls and Robert Nozick have made major contributions to modern political philosophy. Rawls’ most successful philosophical work, “A Theory of Justice,” has helped construct both modern liberal and social democratic concepts of social justice. On the other hand, “Anarchy, State, and Utopia”, Nozick’s most successful philosophical work, constructs a form of libertarianism traditionally associated with John Locke and other philosophers prescribed to individual rights and freedoms. Evidently, both philosophers exhibit two highly distinct political philosophies. One major difference between the two philosophies is the legitimacy of governmental redistribution of wealth. As a result, Rawls and Nozick are at two opposite ends of the political…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speaking of the liberalism in more details, it is based on the firm belief in basic human liberties. Among the developers of liberalism, it is important to identify John Locke, Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham, Alexis de Tocqueville, Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill (Vincent, 2014, p. 27). While it was initially an ideology that did not approve of governmental intervention in the economic activities, in the modern world it allows a definite extent of controlling and regulating as well as contributing to the establishment of social justice. Nevertheless, the most active role of the liberals is visible when referring to the human rights and civil liberties, their defense and advocating positive actions to make the idea of social justice more real. With…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays