Jamie Heyes: Case Study

Jamie Heyes is a good kid who was forced to either let his teammate die or to take action in a situation in the heat of the moment, and what all of us are here to bring to light is weather he wanted to kill Valdez. I can tell you for a fact not a material one that Jamie had no intent to kill, and the evidence supports this. The prosecution cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that any of its points are indisputable or differing experiences What the prosecution is trying to paint for you is that everyone in the security department couldn’t possibly act out, but on the contrary is that conflicts with many if not all the people who happen to get paid visits a little too often by guess who Mr. Demon Eyes himself. Even in the prosecution side
Keep in mind that is one handwriting expert and the other handwriting expert Gale Green that it isn’t a match. The odds for this decision is 50/50 but that isn’t close to beyond a reasonable doubt. Another thing that weighs against Jamie is that he’s an active member of a anti police brutality. Which is for some reason is frowned upon it’s because they want to stereotype him as an violent activist. He catches a lot of heat for this and would you rather have police brutally unlawfully kill people, and not speak or say anything about it is it wrong to not want people killed just because a law enforcement wants to. Would you want your mother killing anyone of harming whoever you she wanted because Jamie's mom is police. A thought that is still lingering in your head is that he killed an officer although that might be true he warned Valdez many times before he swung the bat. Also he has in his statement that he grabbed that bat for defence not for offencive properties. Not only that he closed his eyes when he swung so he couldn’t have known where it would have made