Preview

James Hardie - Auditing and Assurance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
James Hardie - Auditing and Assurance
During October 2009 the Australian Securities and Investment Commission took action against executives and directors of the Centro Proprieties Group and Centro Retail Group. The executives included the former chief executive officer and the former chief financial officer as well as directors from the board of Centro. The ASIC was proceeding with the case on the basis that they assumed that the aforementioned had breached their statutory duty of care and diligence owed to the Centro entities and had therefore breached ss 180(1), 601FD(1) and 344(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The directors had approved financial information for Centro for the year ending 30 June 2007. The financial statement originally classified $1.5 billion in debt as non-current liabilities when it was in fact current liabilities. The statements also failed to disclose $1.75 billion in guarantees. The statements also failed to disclose $600 million of short-term liabilities that had been classified as no current liabilities. Management of Centro and their external auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers failed to detect any errors in the financial statements.
On June 27 2011, the court handed down its findings. The court decided that the directors and executives of Centro were in breach of their duties when they signed off on the misleading financial statements.

In 2007 the ASIC commenced legal proceedings against former directors and officers of James Hardie Industries Limited. In 2001 the company approved a foundation that would be used to compensate victims of asbestos. James Hardie announced that the foundation would have enough funds to cover legitimate claims. The company had taken advice from PricewaterhouseCoopers based on 50 years of claims from victims and prepared a cash flow model in order to ensure sufficient funds were available. It later became obvious that the foundation was well underfunded by a figure well in excess of $1 billion.
The initial decision handed down by Gzell J

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts of the Case: Micro Enhancement International (MEI) was a software development company that was on the about to have an IPO. They hired Coopers and Lybrand as the auditor. The IPO for MEI was delayed because Coopers and Lybrand were resisting some of MEI’s recognized revenue and were threating to add a “going concern” to the audit. In the end Coopers and Lybrand allowed MEI to recognize the revenue and took away the “going concern” qualification. By the time the issue was settled MEI had lost the underwriter for the IPO and then went bankrupt shortly after. MEI sued Coopers and Lybrand for multiple things, but then wanted to add a breach of fiduciary duty. MEI’s CEO Staples said that, “he trusted Coopers and that Coopers had agreed to do the audit to do the Audit and to serve as MEI’s business advisor…” The judge denied this request and MEI appealed.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to the factual allegations, Plaintiffs’ grievances arose out of a 2013 reorganization of the “Covis enterprise”. Plaintiffs argue that, before the reorganization, they held valuable profits interests in Covis Holdings LP (“CLP”). But, as part of the reorganization hey exchanged those interests for less valuable profits interests in Covis US Holdings, LLC (“C-US”), in reliance on Defendants’ actions.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Whittington, R., & Pany, K. (2012). Principles of auditing and other assurance services (18th ed., p. 48). New York, NY: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4. A client changed its depreciation method for production equipment from the straight-line method to the units-of-production method based on hours of utilization. The auditor concurs with the change.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 5.1

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Description: Smith is the Chairman of Cardillo Travel Agency, he just involved into a case that whether to sign the affidavit with United Airlines. Because he inspected that there is something wrong with the affidavit concerning Cardillo’s stockholders’ equity, so that he refused to sign affidavit. Just for this reason, he was kicked out from his position. Moreover, the other two of his executives Rognlien and Lawrence, just approved the $203,000 adjusting entry recorded link to Airlines-Cardillo transaction. Afterward, Helen Shepherd, an auditor of Touch Ross, found the mistake that the money cannot be recorded for the payment to Cardillo was refundable under certain conditions and thus not immediately as revenue, so she questioned Rognlien and Lawrence, but they still insisted the entry of the money has been properly recorded. And one year later, R and L just dismissed the Touch Ross accounting firm and hire KMG as their public accounting firm. After the turnover of KMG, they just founded this matter too, and resigned as the independent audit firm.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary of The Auditor

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Auditor by James K. Loebbecke tells a story about the life and career of an auditor named Jack Butler. The book shows Jack’s career from his education all the way to his promotion to partner. Loebbecke designed this story about Jack as a teaching tool to give students an understanding about the life of an auditor.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Asic

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    4 HIHC made an undocumented $10 million payment to a company controlled by Adler, PEE. Around the time of the payment, PEE became a trustee of a unit trust controlled by the Adler Corporation and two others. Units in the Trust were issued to HIHC at a price of $10 million. Adler Corporation had an existing entitlement to 10% of the Trust’s distributable income, while HIHC acquired a 90% entitlement. The $10 million payment was made in a way to ensure it would not come to the attention of the directors of HIH, apart from Adler, Williams and to a lesser degree Fodera. Using the $10 million payment shares in HIH were then purchased over two weeks. The stock market was given the impression that the purchase of shares were made by Adler or family interests associated with Adler. A further part of the $10 million payment was used to purchase various venture capital unlisted investments from Adler Corporation at cost. It was contended that Mr Adler breached his duties as a director or officer of HIH or HIHC under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act). ASIC sought declarations that various alleged contraventions of the Act had been committed by the three personal defendants. Mr Adler was a non-executive director of HIH. Mr Adler was sued as a non-executive director of HIH and as an alleged officer (non-executive) of its wholly owned subsidiary HIHC. Mr Adler denied he was a director or officer of HIHC. ASIC relied on evidence that as a director of HIH, HIHC’s holding company, Mr Adler was a person who ‘participated in the making of decisions that affected the whole or a substantial party of the business of HIHC’. ASIC also stated that Mr Adler’s participation in investment decisions fell within the category of decisions…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study for Enron

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Based on information given, there was intent or knowledge of wrongdoing which constitutes part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused. It is very difficult to argue 'no knowledge' of a 1.2 billion dollar write down. In a public company, it is the CEO's responsibility to report any and all information that details the health of the company, immediately. Any sign of trouble needs to be reported to the SEC and shareholders as soon as it is found. An organizational restructuring around the same time of several hundred million dollars being reported at a loss sounds too convenient to claim ignorance.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    CBA Scandal and FOFA Reforms

    • 4747 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Through “extensive surveillance” on the conduct of CBA’s financial planning activities between 2007 and 2008, ASIC uncovered evidence which supported claims that the standards of CBA’s operations were “unacceptable”. (Williams, 2013)…

    • 4747 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The report by Examiner Anton R. Valukas identifies what he says are Lehman Brothers’ non-culpable errors of bad judgment and areas where there is “sufficient credible evidence to support a finding by a trier of fact” (for example, a judge or jury). Not exactly a…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A brief summary of the case is, Health Management, Inc., a pharmaceutical distributor had a way of calculating their Allowance of doubtful accounts in a way that was not understood by Securities and Exchange Commission and misunderstood by the financial analysts. This caused the financial analysts to put the post earnings per share at $.74 when it was really $.54. Clifford Hotte, the CEO, was told of the $.20 difference by Drew Bergman, the CFO, and told him he refused to take the hit, because the stock would drop. He had Drew Bergman figure out a way to fix it so they would be on target with what the financial analysts predicted. To fix it Drew Bergman overstated the year-end inventory by $1.8 million along with a couple other small adjustments. The main reason they got away with it is because Drew Bergman used to work for the Auditing Company and therefore knew the company’s procedures. Drew Bergman did this by making false papers and had people lie saying a driver left Pittsburgh facility on April 28, with $1.3 million of drugs, two days before the end of the fiscal year. The truck then arrived after the inventory count in New York and another transfer of more than $500,000 going from New York to Pittsburgh, not using the UPS as usual. Finally they used the false papers and people to claim they forgot to count these drugs and therefore boosted their end of year inventory by $1.8 million.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    week 5 auditing paper

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Internal and external users of financial information require assurance that reports filed are accurate and transparent. Increasingly, both investors and legislators are requiring accountability from executives and financial officers. For this reason, auditing and assurance services must sign-off or attest to the credibility and reliability of written assertions. Creditors rely on the accuracy of financial reports when calculating the risk and interest rate of loans. Investors and employees need reliable information when allocating their precious resources. Governmental agencies require transparency and compliance to insure the public is not being victimized by fraud. Do increased auditing requirements guarantee that there will never be fraud? No! Increased auditing does not promise to prevent fraud, but it does assure us that due diligence is exercised to a reasonable degree in the examination of documents and compliance. Moreover, the benefits of assurance that come from auditing inspire businesses and the economy to thrive. Consequently, the attestation portions of financial reports are a requirement for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as well. Likewise, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) itself must consider and factor in these variables when conducting their audits, since depreciation for tax purposes is not usually identical to the depreciation used in financial reporting. Auditing is a process that takes place when an auditor gathers unprejudiced evidence regarding the reliability and integrity of financial statements, compliance, and operational information provided by an organization. Audits can be performed by different people. Independent auditors, such as CPAs, and governmental auditors, or employees working for federal, state, or local government entities. There are different types of auditors who are not directly employed by the organization being audited. Internal auditors, however, are employed by the organization and go on to perform…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ladislas Nay Fraud

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The accounting firm failed to comply with the General Standards rule 201, which states that agencies must exercise due professional care, professional competence, planning and supervision and having sufficient relevant data. In order for Nay to keep himself from being detected of committing fraud he had established a “mail rule,” where no one was allowed to open or touch any letters that was for him or sent to him. Auditors relied on internal evidence as their source of evidence on documents provided in order to base their opinion. Nay’s illegal act caused financial statements to be materially misstated and external auditors were not aware of his illegal acts. This type of ineffective internal control risk would have been detected by auditors if only they did their job correctly. An audit team’s responsibility is to design procedures to provide reasonable assurance that material frauds that might misstate the financial statements are detected. This would have raised a red flag and they would have approached Nay with a professional skepticism. They would have requested all documents as evidence, in order to validate whether what he was saying and stating in fact was true. Auditors would have traced all documents to test whether all events are recorded, which would have established a state of completeness. However, due to false documents, the auditors would have found Ladislas Nays of committing fraud. The courts felt differently and dismissed the case stating there was no substantive evidence to support the allegation. Investors were unhappy with this and decided to appeal this, the SEC became involved and also stated that the investors were entitled to documents that were of true statements, and the duty of the auditor is to provide this. The courts felt the auditor’s…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper will provide examples for each type of service, which is auditing, assurance and attestation. These are very important services when it comes to the auditing process. There are certain individuals and organizations that may request these services. Also, the standards that apply to each service and who establishes those standards will be further discussed. These services are important to ensure profitability and future success for the business.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Audit & Assurance

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The purpose of Part 1 is to perform preliminary analytical procedures. You have been asked to focus your attention on two purposes of analytical procedures:…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays