Preview

Jack Falstaff Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1194 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jack Falstaff Analysis
Falstaff: Why We Love Plump Jack
In William Shakespeare’s play Henry IV Part One, Sir John Falstaff is a fat, drunken, middle aged man with a lousy sense of honor. He becomes somewhat of a surrogate father to Prince Hal, all the while teaching the young prince his ways of partying and drinking through whatever life brings him, which does not earn him any respect along the way. Along with the immense time that the two spend together, Falstaff’s influence on Prince Hal wreaks all sorts of havoc on Hal’s relationship with his actual father, King Henry IV, leading the king to find a surrogate son himself. On top of all of this, Falstaff is very different from any of the other characters in Henry’s world, who care about honor and their public personas. Though Falstaff seems like an absolute mess, he is one of the most popular characters that Shakespeare has ever created. His appeal comes because he is a contrasting character to all of the others and is also more than just comedic relief to the audience: he comes across as a genuinely good man and, on top of that, Falstaff is relatable in the sense that he represents the good, the bad, the lazy, and more in
…show more content…
He creates a needed contrast from the other, more chivalrous characters in the play. He makes the reader laugh with his drunk, dishonorable lifestyle. He comes across as a good-natured man in the way that he makes Hal’s storyline more plausible. He really is essential to the storyline, though it may not originally seem so. Most of all, he represents the reader. There is some toned-down percentage of Falstaff in everyone, whether it be in his wit or his dishonesty or his laziness or his desire to find the easiest and most fun path out of life’s challenges. In the words of Falstaff himself, it if one was to “Banish plump Jack, [they would] banish all the world”

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the state court case verse Roger “The Dodger” Smith and Jack Merridew was a very intriguing case. I have decided that Roger “The Dodger” Smith is guilty for both accounts of murder. In addition, Jack is also guilty, for the murder of Simon, but not the murder of Piggy. Murders should never be taken lightly, even if its accidental, you must fully investigate what happened on that day.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. In the essay, Outsiders/Insiders, Joseph Boskin, history professor who taught 30 years at Boston University African American studies, director of Urban Studies and Public Program and whose devoted his time and research on the study of American Humor and its relationship to social change and historical events and author of many books of humor's peculiar lies claims that jokes have been greatly influenced by people's personal experiences in American society.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    JACK THE RIPPER ESSAY

    • 979 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To begin with, who was jack the ripper? Jack the Ripper was a serial killer that targeted prostitutes, thieves and the poor, "Jack the Ripper" terrorized the Whitechapel district in London's East End. He killed at least five prostitutes and mutilated their bodies in an unusual way, telling us that the killer had knowledge of the human anatomy. Jack the Ripper was never captured, and remains one of England's, and the worlds, most infamous criminals. This essay will help determine whether or not “Jack the Ripper” not being caught was the police’s fault.…

    • 979 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last difference between Katha Politt and Charles Colson’s essay is tone. Katha Pollitt’s essay is funnier than Charles Colson’s essay. She exposes the humorous example like “marriage is not about Adam and Eva versus Adam and Steve”. Adam and Eva is the famous human that God made, but she changes the thing that the Creator made to make it fun like Adam and Steve. People can understand that simple joke.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeare’s ‘Henry IV Part I’, presents the young Prince Henry as an ambivalent and enigmatic character who is politically cunning in his ability to read situations and respond accordingly. He is a man of the world through his association with his friend Falstaff, but by the end of the play he has also supplanted Hotspur as a soldier and a man of honour who can take astute action when it is called for. By contrast, Hotspur is very much the man of action, though Shakespeare suggests that action, when it is untempered by thought and political acumen, is a dangerous and deadly quality.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his play Henry VIII, author William Shakespeare does an incredible job of conveying the emotions of his character Wolsey, who has just received the shock of his dismissal as the King's advisor. Shakespeare's description is realistic because it reflects the range of feelings people often undergo when reeling from an unexpected disappointment. Wolsey's soliloquy reveals anger and lamentation as he struggles to come to terms with what has happened. Shakespeare portrays both the hostility and despair of Wolsey's reaction through allusion, figurative language, and an altercation in tone.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the soliloquy from Shakespeare's play, Henry VIII, Shakespeare’s use of elements represents complex Wolsey’s reaction from dismissal of the court that grows from a conceited tone that developes into one of self pity.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Henry IV—a young man who must grow up to become king, take on his responsibilities…

    • 3599 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reflecting Elizabethan moral absolutes, Shakespeare acknowledges that a capacity for deception, manipulation and the quest for power is central to the human condition and clearly delineates the complex nature of evil in the character of Richard. Shakespeare dramatically portrays Richard’s villainous intentions and motivations to the Elizabethan audience in the opening soliloquy announcing- “he is made villain” to “usurp” the throne like a symbolic “usurping boar” being physically and morally “deformed” by his craving for power. Subsequently, Richard uses his guises as a tool for deception; he is a passionate lover desperately “wooing Lady Anne” yet a conniving murderer killing her husband, also ironically appearing to be a “loyal loving brother” by eradicating “George” himself. Shakespeare then reaffirms the results of human’s corruption and insatiability for power to the Elizabethan audience as he “proves a villain” must “fall prey to his” own “subtle and treacherous”…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before Henry was King he was constantly being showered with compliments over him being an outstanding prince and that he will make a brilliant King, one of many examples of this we can see through Lord Mountjoy’s writings. He says Henry is a ‘great prince’. Another example of the monarch being spoken highly of is in the writing of a Venetian diplomat Pasqualigo, during which he not only discusses the potential Henry has as a king for example Pasqualigo describes him to be ‘a most accomplished prince’. Pasqualigo also gives us an insight on Henry’s other qualities, we discover Henry’s ability to speak multiple languages and he has a very good sense of modern fashion. Pasqualigo also briefly talks about Henry’s good looks; he even goes as far to say the Henry would make a ‘pretty women’.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jack the Ripper in the name given to an anonymous serial killer in the early 19th century connected to a series of murders in the town of Whitechapel (Bio.com). The name Jack the Ripper was coined in the middle of the line of murders, thanks to an anonymous letter that was sent to the police officers in September of 1888 (Casebook). After a couple of weeks, some journalists found out about the story and it spread like wildfire, making Jack the Ripper the first serial killer to create a worldwide panic. Jack the Ripper did a lot of things in his murderous years, he was the first serial killer to cause worldwide panic, he helped draw attention to this issues in the town of Whitechapel, and he improved the way people looked at crime scenes and the way things are done after a murder.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    advice with the sarcastic reply to do not ÒShow me the steep and thorny way to…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crucible - Danforth

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Danforth is a very authoritative character throughout the play and is often the one to regain order in times of chaos. He is a key character in the play, used by Miller to engage the audience. As he begins to believe Mary Warren that it was all lies, it gives the audience hope, and builds up the suspense leaving the audience wanting to know what will happen next.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Jack and the Beanstalk and Kate and the Beanstalk, the meaning that is supposed to come out of both of the books is very similar. In both books, they want the readers to know that good will always wins over evil. The plot contrasts some from both books. In Jack and the Beanstalk, the tall woman warned him to leave unless he wanted to be a meal, but in Kate in the Beanstalk every time Kate climbed up the beanstalk the woman asked her for help to cook for the giant. Jack stole the stuff from the giant to help his family, while Kate stole from the giant to help a girl and her mom because the giant had killed the girl’s father, which was a knight. In Kate and the Beanstalk, characters were added that was not in the folktale Jack and the…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays