Is a Person’s Right to Defend Himself More Important Than a Person’s Right to Privacy?
Is a Person’s Right to Defend Himself More Important than a Person’s Right to Privacy?
Today, the online virtual world has expanded greatly compared to where it was just a decade ago. It has made space for many social media sites such as, Facebook, Twitter, Google+, among many other sites. Thus, meaning less privacy, and more people who can potentially gain access to it. As a result, the debate about whether a defense attorney should be authorized to gain a hold of users’ profiles has been going on since the creation of social media sites. Some who are against defense attorneys gaining access to profiles argue that it offends one's privacy. While others who are for it believe it is helpful for the court to judge fairly. Defense attorneys should be authorized to gain access to social media sites because; they are an effective tool in investigating witnesses and defendants. People who are against defense attorneys gaining access to profiles on social media sites state that it offends our right to privacy to have someone searching through our accounts. Facebook and other social networking sites are used by people to connect with friends and meet new people. Postings on these sites stay on the internet and anyone who you befriend can get a hold of your profile Users voluntarily post all of their pictures and information on their accounts to share with other users of these social network sites so they cannot claim they have a right to prevent access to this information. It would be unrealistic to expect that they be considered confidential. People should know beforehand that nothing on the internet is private. The ones who are against defense attorneys getting a hold of users’ profiles also state that, sometimes it is not the user who updates posts on the account but, many cases have proven otherwise. Social media sites are an effective tool for lawyers and have many benefits through investigating witnesses and defendants. Evidence revealed from profile
Today, the online virtual world has expanded greatly compared to where it was just a decade ago. It has made space for many social media sites such as, Facebook, Twitter, Google+, among many other sites. Thus, meaning less privacy, and more people who can potentially gain access to it. As a result, the debate about whether a defense attorney should be authorized to gain a hold of users’ profiles has been going on since the creation of social media sites. Some who are against defense attorneys gaining access to profiles argue that it offends one's privacy. While others who are for it believe it is helpful for the court to judge fairly. Defense attorneys should be authorized to gain access to social media sites because; they are an effective tool in investigating witnesses and defendants. People who are against defense attorneys gaining access to profiles on social media sites state that it offends our right to privacy to have someone searching through our accounts. Facebook and other social networking sites are used by people to connect with friends and meet new people. Postings on these sites stay on the internet and anyone who you befriend can get a hold of your profile Users voluntarily post all of their pictures and information on their accounts to share with other users of these social network sites so they cannot claim they have a right to prevent access to this information. It would be unrealistic to expect that they be considered confidential. People should know beforehand that nothing on the internet is private. The ones who are against defense attorneys getting a hold of users’ profiles also state that, sometimes it is not the user who updates posts on the account but, many cases have proven otherwise. Social media sites are an effective tool for lawyers and have many benefits through investigating witnesses and defendants. Evidence revealed from profile