Preview

Is War Wrong Or Holy

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
366 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is War Wrong Or Holy
The issue of war pose to us a question on if war is just, wrong or holy. These three questions can be answered after critical analysis on the purpose of the war. These question gives us possible views on ‘Wrong War’ being violent and the perception of killing being wrong. This is the pacifist view. Some wars are supposed to be interested in justice and should henceforth be conducted following the just rules. Such wars are referred to as termed as ‘Just War’. ‘Holy War’ belief suggests that the Supreme Being of any religion is in a position to question, command the believers to devise a war on the antagonists of the religion and anyone who do not believe in that religion. From the Islamic consideration, the word Islam means to submit or to surrender
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    ap dbq 1
    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ap dbq 1

    While some religions, like Christianity and Islam, may have defended war in time of defense, other such as Buddhism condemned war at all accounts, as well as the Daoism. I will now go through some different religious views on war.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Just War Theory In Vietnam
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just War Theory In Vietnam

    The part of the just war theory is called jus ad bellum. There must be a just cause, right authority, proportionality, the goal of peace, with war as a last resort. A country cannot attack another country for more wealth or for more respect. They must attack on behalf of an innocent third country or group. Right authority means that war must be declared by the proper authorities and not by private companies. Proportionality means that the potential war must be assessed regarding the cost of the war and the benefits from the war. The country must also decide whether or not the potential gains outweigh the loss of human lives and the cost of the war. Next, “will the destructiveness of the proposed conflict outweigh any enhancement of other human values?” That means will the war any enhance aspects of the human life more than the violence that will occur during the war. The purpose of the war must be for peace, not solely to win glory. Finally, the war must be a last resort, meaning that all other methods for peace must be attempted before resorting to…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism
    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Outline the concepts of just war and pacifism

    The Just war theory maintains that war may be justified if fought only in certain circumstances, and only if certain restrictions are applied to the way in which war is fought. The theory that was first propounded by St Augustine of Hippo and St Ambrose of Milan ( 4th and 5th centuries AD) attempts to clarify two fundamental questions: ‘when is it right to fight?’ and ‘How should war be fought?’. Whereas Pacifists are people mainly Christians who reject the use of violence and the deliberate killing of civilians but claims that peace is intrinsically good and ought to be upheld either as a duty and that war can never be justifiable. However, Realists agree that, due to the nature of humans, force is a necessary action to be used to maintain a just and ordered society. Therefore, since the Second World War, people have turned their attention to Just War again establishing rules that can serve as guidelines to a just war- the Hague and Geneva conventions.…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Society's Argumentative Essay: The Conflict Of War
    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page

    Society's Argumentative Essay: The Conflict Of War

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jewish Persecution in First Crusade
    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jewish Persecution in First Crusade

    St. Augustine of Hippo’s work on the Just War was a vastly important document in the rationalization of the Crusades and the victimization of the Jews. “Augustine of Hippo (d. 430) was one of the most influential early Christian theologians, helping to shape medieval thinking on a wide variety of topics.”[1] Augustine in his work on the just war clearly notes that the act, the agent, and the authority for the action are all of great importance in the order of nature, that only wars of defense are justified, and also that if God commands for war, such as he did with Moses, that the war could always be justified.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Just War
    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Just War

    Force should be used when there are legitimate reasons for using it, and when it is the last resort for the government, who is responsible for civic peace. Elshtain uses Augustine to discuss justice and war. A paradox between war and peace is introduced, Elshtain uses an Augustine quote to discuss the similarity of two words that are complete polar opposites, “Peace and war had a contest in cruelty, and peace won the prize.” In history, there are many instances where evil and horrible things are done in the name of ‘peace’. Elshtain continues with the early Christian beliefs that under Jesus’ teaches forbid force in anyway, even under authority. Later, it transforms to the necessity of force to protect others. This leads to the four qualifications that Elshtain wrote to justify a war, the first is that the war must be publicly declared by a legitimate jurisdiction. The second criteria is that an unjust violence must have occurred against the government’s own people or a defenseless group. Third, the war has to be start with the proper motives. Finally, all other alternatives must be exhausted before leading to war. In the end, Elshtain includes a final criteria that must be met for a war to be ‘just’, the possibility of actually winning the conflict. If there is no chance of succeeding, the conflict should not be…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Proponents Vs Pacifists
    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Just War Proponents Vs Pacifists

    “War, what is it good for”? The lyrics to the 60’s pop song, provokes the question that Just War proponents and Pacifists have wrestled with throughout history, reaching opposite conclusions. Those in favor of Just War theory, say war is only good insofar as it is fought for the right reasons and brings about the right end. Whereas, Pacifists reject war completely, preferring peaceful means to resolve conflict. But which one is morally and ethically right? Which one should be adopted and practiced by the Nations of this World? Upon examining the logic and philosophical implications of each ethical stance, one is able to sympathize with them both, seeing their values and virtue.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Just And Unjust War Analysis
    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Just And Unjust War Analysis

    A large sector of just war theory references several moral and legal implications that must be evaluated prior to engaging in attack. The legalist paradigm, as expressed by theorist and author Michael Walzer in his book Just and Unjust Wars1, evaluates the conditions that constitute just war, and elaborates on several of the key circumstances that are required to impose just war on others. Despite its strengths, this paradigm is often evaluated as being a “strawman”, and provides only a foundation for which several other nuanced views can expand on. One fundamental idea expressed in his claims though, is the idea that “nothing but aggression can justify war”1. Through this, Walzer establishes the only moral precedent for which a counter-attack…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philosophy's Just War theory
    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philosophy's Just War theory

    (e) “The just war theory makes war fair” Discuss this statement. You should include different, supported points of view and a personal viewpoint. You must refer to Christianity in your answer. [12]…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics War
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ethics War

    The just war tradition is a collection of historical views and theories, which eventually developed the just war theory. The just war theory follows a criteria that distinguishes when a country is just to use military action against another country. This theory attempts to protect the innocent and preserve the basic human rights. The criteria which it follows, is meant to examine when the moral decision to use force arises from a conflict of prima facie obligations. The theory operates within a prima facie duty to use force as a last resort in defense of human life and values. When the moral tension arises between these prima facie obligations, they conflict with each other. The just war theory indicates that when the prima facie duty not to injure or kill others can be overridden by another prima facie duty, to act justly and always pursue justice.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Just War Theory
    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just War Theory

    Elshtain, Jean B. “What Is A Just War.” Reading The World: Ideas That Matter. 2nd ed. ED Michael Austin. New York: Norton, 2009. 303.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein: The Modern Day Prometheus
    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Frankenstein: The Modern Day Prometheus

    Human beings have been at battle with one another since prehistoric times, and people have been discussing the rights and wrongs of it for almost just as long. The purpose of war ethics is to help decide what is right or wrong, both for individuals and countries, and to contribute to debates on public policy, and ultimately to government and individual action. War ethics also lead to the creation of formal codes of war, the drafting and implementation of rules of engagement for soldiers, and in the punishment of soldiers and others for war crimes. War ethics are a highly controversial topic and many people’s opinions differ on the subject. For instance, there are individuals who believe that war is bad because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people. These people also believe that war is a fundamental wrong and an abuse of the victims’ human rights. People opposing the war may even extend further with the idea or theory of pacifism. There are several different forms of pacifism, but they all include the idea that war and violence are unjustifiable, and that conflicts should be settled in a peaceful manner. Many people believe that pacifism is more than opposition to war. They argue that it must include action to promote justice and human rights. This is where those who believe that war isn’t particularly good nor bad but believe it may be necessary and do not see it as wrong come into the picture. The people for war believe that war should be fought if there is a just cause, has been lawfully declared, the intention behind the war is good or pure, other plans of resolving issues had been tried first, there is a reasonable chance of success, and the means must be in proportion to the end that the war seeks to achieve. Many individuals for war argue that it is important to acknowledge the difference between the moralities of pacifism as it applies to an individual, and the application…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Just War Theory
    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Just War Theory

    What justifies war? Who justifies it? Why as human beings do we feel the need to fight, harm, and kill others to achieve certain goals? These questions have been pertinent to our society since the beginning of time and continue to challenge us to better understand the human psyche, and code of ethics that give Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Coast Guardsmen, and Marines credence to kill in the name of the United States of America. These ethics of war lay the foundation for that code of understanding and righteousness for when it is justifiable to pull the trigger and take the life of another, or commit an act of war.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Final
    • 2012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Final

    War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothing! Around the World everyday there is some type of war happening. War affect everyone and thousands or even millions die because of war. The problem or issue that I’m going to talk about is why war is morally wrong and can war ever be justified. This Essay will talk about many thing including the three traditions of thought that dominate the ethics of war and peace: Realism; Pacifism; and the Just War Theory. Another thing I’m going to talk about is why war should be understood as an actual intentional and widespread armed conflict between political communities. I’m also going talk where does the church stand on the topic of war. There are lots of debates on war whether it a good thing or an awful thing on the face of the earth. So the controversy behind this topic that some people believe that you can achieve a common good by going to war. By that I mean war help out the economy, For Example in 1930’s The Great Depression was happening and World War II brought jobs that caused The Great Depression to end. The Other group of people believe that going to war is completely wrong, that you will not achieve anything and make the situation worst. For Example, pretend the rebel took out the angry dictator, the country will be unsettled with no government or Constitution. Post World War II, The United Nations (UN) is an intergovernmental organization established 24 October 1945, to promote international co-operation. A replacement for the ineffective League of Nations, the organization was created following the Second World War to prevent another such conflict. Most of the time War violate human rights, For Example in World War Two there was a Jewish Genocide. Acts of genocide violate the most fundamental and broadly accepted principles of human conduct. The World Wars, and the huge losses of life and gross abuses of human rights that took place during them, were a driving force behind the development of modern human…

    • 2012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Warfare Is Wrong
    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Warfare Is Wrong

    Humanity always resolved their conflicts with one another with various weapons. The only difference is as over time, so do the methods of combat. Warfare is wrongfully defined as "the process of military struggle between two nations or groups of nations; war." (Warfare). This untrue definition induced many to wrongfully assume that only one type of warfare exists; Leading to believe it only happens on the battlefield during a war between countries. The actual definition of "warfare" doesn't imply military action or combat limited to only soldiers, yet it's defined as a direct act of aggression that ends with individuals emotionally or physically scarred.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics