Preview

Is Inequality Necessary?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
387 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Inequality Necessary?
According to Adam Ferguson and John Miller, inequality is necessary because it is a great thing. These two believe that with inequality, private property will emerge and when it does people will be creating assets for themselves. When the people are able to create assets, they have a motive to work harder to earn what they deserve. Being more efficient on a daily basis can help a person become more active and helps them accomplishes more. A person can save the resources that they have and convert it into assets of their own, thus creating their own wealth. Ferguson and Millar says that because of personal incentives, a person will not stop working after they have completed their job and received the needed amount. Instead, they will continue on to work even more to gain more in order move up the ladder in society. As social progress, it aids in the development of civilization which is the ultimate goal. I believe that inequality is necessary, because of how unfair things are, if a person is willing to work harder than another, they should have more assets for themselves.

Adam Ferguson and John Miller see inequality as something that is necessary for the development of civilization. One must work hard to achieve goals and build up more assets for themselves. Free-rider program on the other hand is similar to a free-lancer. A person, who refuses to participate in the work need to push forward, is in a way opposite to what Ferguson and Miller said about inequality. There are lazy people out there who would rather have someone else do the work for them. A group working on a project can only hope that the other members on their team will be able to do their own part. With inequality in the air, a person can only predict that the free rider program will follow. A person’s asset will only grow as big as they are pushing it to be, but without hard work and by doing mediocre job, an individual might not get too far. Mankind is always moving forward and the free

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inequality can be defined as a Disproportionate share of recourses throughout society, including wealth, education and in some countries health care.…

    • 257 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a book that is really short, less than 100 pages, the page that was not even a full size to start. But it was worth reading. Simply stated, the author, a professor of philosophy at Princeton who previously wrote a popular book called On the bullshit roundly rejects the pursuit of economic equality as morally valid goal. He characterizes the pursuit as alienating a person of yourself, by defining…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is shown in the fact that 68.7 percent of the world’s population only holds three percent of the wealth in the world and only 8.4 percent of the world’s population has 83.3 percent of the wealth of the world (Doc 6). The 68.7 percent of the world with the least amount of money often works in factories for very low wages, these factories being owned by the most wealthy. This relates to how those who get ahead have to step on others, with the wealthy exploiting the poor for their wealth.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nickel and Dimed

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two very different ideas are presented in the hierarchy of humanity, known as the theories of stratification. The first is the functionalist theory of stratification. This theory holds that, according to Emile Durkheim, "inequalities are good for society..." Certain people are designed and trained to perform certain jobs, and only those people can perform them to their full capacity. The workplace must reward the employee for good jobs and advances in specialization and training. This will induce the employee to work at his or her full potential. The second idea, which juxtaposes the first, is the conflict theory of stratification. This theory poses the idea that any form of social stratification creates a small, powerful group of individuals, and a large group of low wage, working class citizens. This theory also makes the points that, those who are in power, try to keep it, and proceed to create further disadvantages for the working class. The conflict theory in effect states that social inequalities are not good for society as they limit the ability for talented workers to realize their potential and utilize in the workforce.…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    individuals or groups lacking in these resources. In this course, we will deal with inequality as it…

    • 261 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A free- rider is a person who wants others to pay for a public good and then plan to use the good themselves; if many people act as free riders, the public good may never be provided. The problem with free-rider is when something is offered with no charge, people will demand more of it and later that create a shortage on those resources. An Example of free-riders would be health care, which requires that hospitals provide emergency care to anyone who needs it, regardless of citizenship, legal status or ability to pay, so anyone can get services whether they paid for that service or not. For public goods to be offered tax payer must first pay for the good but many people don’t pay taxes to be using the services it offers, which I can admit…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chile Income Inequality

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Education is another cause of income inequality. The more education or training you get the more you will get paid and the faster you will climb up the ladder in the company. Most companies do not hire anyone off the street, getting a successful job requires skill and education. For example, the St. Cloud Hospital will not hire a nurse unless they have a four year bachelor's degree. No matter if a nurse had thirty years of experience but no bachelor’s degree, they would hire someone with a four year degree who just got out of school any day of the…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    "How Economic Inequality Harms Societies." Richard Wilkinson:. TED Talks, July 2011. Web. 26 Feb. 2015.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What are the solutions of 17 ≤ 2x + 7 ≤ 29? Graph the solutions.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gospel of Wealth: Debate

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Carnegie believed that the inequality of wealth in society showed that the rich were superior, and worked hard to achieve their wealth. On the other hand, poor people chose not to work hard. And therefore were poor. This was the condition of a free society, where people were free to work hard to gain wealth, or free to starve.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inequality for All

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The film “Inequality for All” tries to explain; what is the current status of the distribution of wealth and that of income equality? Why this is happening and if this is a problem. Yes, as stated in the film, social inequality is inevitable. But, there is without a doubt a problem with United States distribution of wealth. One of the facts that really opened my eyes was the fact that the 400 richest Americans, together hold more wealth than the poorest 150 million Americans have together. This said, it is scary to think about how obscure was the knowledge we had on the one percent with given how much economic influence they have.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On Income Inequality

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Income inequality means that there is no equality between people. Also, there are big differences between the rich and everyone else. This problem grows year after year. Some people become poor and other become rich. The American Dream is related to income because everyone who wants to achieve the American Dream must have a great income. Rich and poor people are all human beings, but poor people have stolen money from each other because they do not have a great experience to get money. Rich people have great experience in business because they received from his or her family, also they study in great school and university. In addition, education is one of the greatest things to have the huge income. People who study in higher education will…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Income Inequality

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Over the years America’s inequality income gap has been growing, between the rich and the poor. There are many reasons why this is happening. Andrew Carnegie, John Kenneth Galbraith and Joseph Stiglitz may agree with me, but believe there are different reasons why and how it should be dealt with. I would have to say that I agree that Galbraith’s idea is what is better for America now.…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unequal income distribution between the richer and poorer individuals in a society will create inequality in resources they have access to for instance low income individuals will have access to food bank with no choice of variety, however the higher income individuals will be able to choose where they shop and they will be able to determine what level of quality the purchase.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under pure socialism, classes become indistinguishable—if not nonexistent—due to its focus on equality. Although this may be preferable to the lives of the Industrial Revolution-era lower class, it ignores the human race’s competitive nature, taking key motivations away from the people needed to spur their society’s economy. Pure capitalism, on the other hand, recognizes this need for motivation, stating that when people are given economic freedom, “the obvious and simple system of natural liberty establishes itself of its own accord” (Smith). Despite the motivation that this system provides, it only serves to worsen the class inequality still present to this day. Because capitalist societies are barely under any government economic control, the most successful people continue to be just as successful, leaving the poorest with little to no chance of class mobility. Communism, like capitalism, attempts to provide motivation for its citizens. However, since communism is based mostly upon people being “instruments of labour” working for their societies (Marx and Engels), motivation for the sake of the individual becomes almost impossible. In place of this, communism attempts to provide a more community-focused motivation, but without monetary reward, the work can begin to seem…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics