Does the Darwinian theory of natural selection show that there is no such thing as purpose in nature, or does it show that there are purposes and they are perfectly natural causal processes (Rosenberg, 2005)? When considering this question posed by Rosenberg (2005), I tend to agree with the latter contention, believing that, in the course of things, changes occur which make creatures better suited for their environments and these traits are passed on to future generations leading to their eventual dominance and the extinction of traits or even species that do not have the fortune of experiencing such happy accidents. It is not, in my estimation, a conscious process, but one driven by purpose with traits possessed of greater utility persisting for longer periods in the natural world.
References
Rosenberg, A. (2005). Philosophy of science: A contemporary introduction (Second ed.). New York, New York, USA: Routledge.
References: Rosenberg, A. (2005). Philosophy of science: A contemporary introduction (Second ed.). New York, New York, USA: Routledge.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Bibliography: Chalmers, A. (1976). What is this thing called science?. 1st ed. St. Lucia, Q.: University of Queensland…
- 1148 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There are many different species in the world which, according to Darwin, all came from one source, e.g. a bacteria or organism. Within each species, natural variation occurs, therefore the individual beings within the specie look different from one another. These differences are caused by genetic makeup (50% from your mum, 50% from your dad). There are some genes like down-syndrome that get switched on when combined with other genes. Some genes can also undergo mutation- a random change (e.g. being born with six fingers, instead of five). Most mutations are harmful, for example Siamese twins joined by the brain, but some like the cheetah’s spots are good, they make it easier for the cat to camouflage better. This mutation increased survival fitness; therefore it got passed on and became a permanent feature. The other cheetah’s without spot started dying out, as they could not camouflage as well as the spotted one, and got caught when stalking their prey. Evolution is the process of natural selection according to Darwin; it enables us to find mutations which help us survive. In addition to natural selection, Darwin also suggested that species evolve through sexual selection. Darwin suggested that animals would evolve through time and end up with physical and behavioural characteristics that allow them to survive efficiently and compete effectively with rivals. For example, the peacock’s tail appears to reduce its chance of survival as it attracts predators and hinders its flight. But the tail is what helps it survive, as it attracts the females, the brighter, colourful and bigger the tail is; the more chance of mating it has. An example of sexual selection in humans is hairlessness. Although the loss of hair may have enabled us to keep cool in the hot weather by sweating, lack of hair meant we had to adapt to…
- 2152 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Bibliography: Pg153: Nietzsche 's philosophy of science: reflecting science on the ground of art and life - Babette E. Babich…
- 2567 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Bibliography: Sosa, Ernest [1980]: “The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence Versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge.” In Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. 5: Studies in Epistemology. Minneapolis MN: University of Minneapolis Press: 3–25. Stace, W.T. [1967]: “Science and the Physical World.” In Man Against Darkness and Other Essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Tye, Michael [2009]: “A New Look at the Speckled Hen.” In Analysis 60, April: 258–63. Yolton, John W. [1970]: Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…
- 57372 Words
- 230 Pages
Best Essays -
(2009). ‘The bright sparks who illuminate the history of science’ The Times, 30 November 2009, p. 18.…
- 1217 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
By juxtaposing the antithetical concepts of “certainty” and “uncertainty,” and by emphasizing the exceptional burdens of the latter, Barry compels his readers to acknowledge the courage that is required of any successful scientists and, indeed, to appreciate the unnatural skills that a scientist must possess in order to “overcome significant obstacles.” He effectively argues that uncertainty, though a weakness, is a cross that all scientists must bear and that, in order to become a successful scientist at all, one must first recognize that weakness and then persevere in spite of it. To the casual observer, venturing into the unknown might seem the more courageous feat of the scientists, but, as the allusion to Bernard’s quote reveals, the most courageous feat, and what science endeavors to teach most of all, is “to doubt” – that is, to be uncertain and to work with the discomfort of that uncertainty.…
- 712 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hunter, Cornelius, Science’s Blind Spot: The Unseen Religion of Scientific Naturalism, Ada, MI: Brazos Press, 2007.…
- 2863 Words
- 12 Pages
Best Essays -
Scientific objectivity, according to Louise Antony and Thomas Kuhn, is fundamentally unattainable because of the human epistemological condition. The open-mindedness, or freedom from existing notions, that pervades almost all definitions of “objectivity” is inherently uncharacteristic of the human mind, and Antony explains that scientific reluctance to entertain new, controversial hypotheses is one manifestation of this innate mental road-block. When scientists view data that contradicts the central principles of their discipline, scientists react by questioning the data, not the principles. Antony argues, however, that adhering to accepted axioms, such as the idea that atoms are the fundamental constituents of all matter, enables scientific progress. Without the basic framework, or paradigm, that views atoms as the basic units of all chemical elements, chemistry would never have developed and, needless to say, advanced.…
- 526 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Barry begins the excerpt by conceptualizing certainty in the minds of scientists. The passage begins with “A scientist must accept the fact that all of his or her work, even beliefs, may break apart upon the sharp edge of a single laboratory finding.” He continues by stating that "certainty creates strength... uncertainty creates weakness" (1-3). By using syntax and parallel structure the author indicates that mental inquiry and understanding of the subject in question is a necessity for the scientist. This contrast of certainty lays the framework for the succeeding paragraphs. The second and third paragraphs build on this assumption by putting forth the basic qualities and describing the difficulties of a scientist and their work. He continues to explain scientists in a metaphor as ones merely existing on the frontier or precipice of technology, taking experimental steps into the unknown which may lead to their downfall. Barry describes the innovation of the scientist as “seeing through the looking glass into a world that seems entirely different”. However, he cautions the formulation of new theories by saying that “science teaches us to…
- 862 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A Skeptic way of life simply lived could be demonstrated. There is not always a need to engage in discourse on this matter. There is the possibility that discourse is imperfect and as such demonstrating my means of ‘doing’ can often be a better philosophical device. Philosophy not only becomes an explicit form of reasoning, communication or discourse; but implicit too. It is a wonder that still to today, the field of philosophy as practiced in universities is not yet an exposition of this wide definition, but rather even, a contained form of explicitness.…
- 1465 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The modern forms of the logic theory of scientific discovery have abandoned the discovery model of pure logic, and search after the discovery logic in a broad sense. Both the retrospective inference which Hanson initiated and the inductive which Maclauin elucidated deserve serious attention among them [1]. Their common charateristics are to resort to the irrational factors, at the same time, they are unable to expound the process of emergence of the new ideas. In addition, the rationality of discovery is summed up into "the algorithm" or "the patterns of discovery" is still put forward, and it holds that it is according to the overeconomical principle that the discovery of the scientific…
- 2604 Words
- 11 Pages
Better Essays -
Malachowski, Al(1993) 'Methodological scepticism, metaphysics and meaning ', International Journal of Philosophical Studies,1:2,302 — 312…
- 1299 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The role of language as a vehicle of thought makes way for human thinking to be as multifaceted and diverse as it is. This is for the reason that with language, one can describe the past or speculate about the future and so deliberate and plan in the light of one’s beliefs about how things stand. To cement this view, language enables one to imagine counterfactual objects, events, and states of affairs. In this connection, it is intimately related to intentionality, the feature of all human thoughts whereby they are essentially about, or directed toward, things outside themselves. If, as is the case, language allows one to share information and to communicate beliefs and speculations, attitudes and emotions, then, it creates the human social world, uniting people into a common history and a common life-experience. In the end, what we see is that language is an instrument of understanding and knowledge.…
- 4995 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Klemke, E.D., R. Hollinger, D. Rudge, A. (Eds) Klein, and A. (David) Klein (1998), Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science: Prometheus Books.…
- 1407 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The demarcation problem in the philosophy of science is about how to distinguish between science and nonscience, and more specifically, between science and pseudoscience (a theory or method doubtfully or mistakenly held to be scientific). The debate continues after over a century of dialogue among philosophers of science and scientists in various fields, and despite broad agreement on the basics of scientific method.…
- 2129 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays