Preview

Is Coriolanus Behavior Due To His Own Nature

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
404 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is Coriolanus Behavior Due To His Own Nature
Is Coriolanus’s behavior due to his upbringing or due to his own nature?
Caius Martius displays an aggressive behavior throughout the whole play. Volumnia is largely to blame. Due to the fact that by bringing Caius Martius up and implanting this idea in his head of violence and the hatred towards the plebeians. She has not only influenced his behavior but also his nature.
Volumnia praises violence. This is seen when Caius Martius is first sent to war, Virgilia does not want Caius Martius to come back covered in blood however Volumnia says, “it more becomes a man. Than gilt his trophy.” This proves that Volumnia believes if Caius Martius does not come back with wounds he has no proof of his honor. Volumia is compared to a man in the play. Another example of her violence because back their era a man was seen as fierce and powerful, this is due to the fact that the men would go off and fight in wars. The men had all the rights and the women had nothing. So by Volumnia being compared to a man it enhances her power and status. By Volumnia being the way she is Cauis Marius would have been influenced through his childhood, making him more prone to violence. Thus also influencing is own way of thinking.
…show more content…
In Cauis Marius and Volumnia’s case this is true. Thus, meaning that because Volumnia has an aggressive nature so does Cauis Maruis. His aggerisve nature is seen time and time again in the play. For example in the very beginning he lashes out at the plebeians when they protest. This shows both is aggressive nature but also his hate towards the people which is another thing he inherits from his mother. Volumnia believes that without her he wouldn’t be where he is today. This is evident when she says, “to see inherited my very wishes”. Thus showing the reader just how much influence she has over his in every

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Rape of Lucretia is a legend that was important to the Romans. It was a tragedy about a Roman matron woman who commits suicide. The story is important because it expresses the role of married women in the Roman civilization. It describes what behavior the Romans considered appropriate for a typical Roman wife. From reading this excerpt from the History of Rome, one learns that a women’s worth is based on their virtue, men considered their wives as possessions, and rape enraged the Roman population.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Coriolanus, Shakespeare to a full extent questions the value of the Roman warrior code and sees the difficulties that it causes. Firstly I discuss the warrior code that is valued and held in Rome. Secondly I analyze Coriolanus inability to infringe the warrior code entirely. Thirdly I explore the consequences this has on Roman society.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He is annoyed with the crown for their disrespect towards Pompey. Is plotting with Marullus to make sure none of the Caesars statues are decorated. He is loyal to Pompey, and not to Caesar. Pray to the gods to intermit the plague That needs must light on this ingratitude. This quote shows that Marullus thinks the commoners are ungrateful to Pompey, now that Caesar is in power.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Power is a theme that has dominated mankind since history was recorded. The assassination of Julius Caesar, ruler of the greatest empire the world has ever known, was a result of such a struggle for power. The foundations of Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' are power relationships which dominate the liaisons between characters of opposing sex, classes, and ambitions. Even in the historical context, Rome in 44 BC, the height of the Roman Republic, predisposes the play to a complex tangle of power conflicts. As the power of prominent characters builds tension, ambitions develops, and thus manipulation arises. Struggles of authority and dominance are evident between the characters in 'Julius Caesar', through Shakespeare's…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jealousy In Julius Caesar

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The character Cassius in the tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare constantly reflects palpable jealousy. In Act I Scene II, Cassius claims “I was born free as Caesar; so were you:/We both have fed as well, and we both/Endure the winter’s cold as well as he…”(Shakespeare, lines 5-7); and feels king Caesar does not deserve superiority over him. In this scene, Cassius is pointing out to Brutus that he and Cassius deserve the power to lead Rome more than Caesar. In order to prove these points, Cassius shares three stories with Brutus in his speech: one of when he and Caesar had a swimming contest; another when he saw Caesar sickly and frail after a fever; and lastly one where Caesar again is portrayed as a weak and sickly man. In the monologue by Cassius directed at Brutus, Cassius uses paradox, self-heroic word choice and similes throughout three separate stories to give examples of Caesar’s weaknesses. Cassius’ main goal becomes to portray Caesar as any other man; and to rationalize killing the king to gain power for (what he…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Greek Rule hundreds of years ago women were put to a standard and expected to maintain it through everything that they do. When any woman did anything out of the norm then they were most likely ridiculed for what they had done. In his play, Oresteia, Aeschylus highlights the implications of gender roles in Greek society with the foiling of Clytemnestra by Electra to illustrate the Greek ideals and views of woman in contrast to their men, the juxtaposition of Orestes and Clytemnestra as equal in their crime yet differing in justification and reaction by the chorus, and significance of male progression in justice as carried out through the victory of Apollo over the Euminides despite justice being carried out by a female goddess, Athena.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare identifies his conflicting perspectives with 16th Century English society by utilising the concept of everyman. Brutus represents ‘everyman’ within the drama allowing the audience to associate and relate this is shown significantly in Act 3 Scene 1. Shakespeare employs symbolism and imagery depicting a man’s lust for blood and violence “let us bathe our hands in Caesar’s blood”. An initial reading of the text would suggest Shakespeare cleverly interprets a noble act of Brutus in honouring Caesar’s death but rather exposing his attraction for brutality and bloodshed. The violent attraction which Brutus possesses is due to all men to satisfy an inner need for violence, the attraction that is displayed in Brutus demonstrates Shakespeare’s fear of a violent English society. Shakespeare employs the repetition of “noble” to create Antanaclasis. Shakespeare reverses the 21st Century meaning of noble, whilst allows the audience to view a 16th century view of nobility as a cause of tyranny and oppression. From one reading of the text, Shakespeare creates an ironic context that views Brutus a tyrannous noble in which he is a descendent from a line that destroyed the oppressive nature of the monarch. In…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romeo’s impulsive behavior influences him to make unwise decisions such as Tybalt’s death, a result of the rivalry between the Capulets and Montagues. Even though Romeo is extremely non-violent, the same cannot describe the other…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lucretia was a beautiful girl and Prince Sextus desired to have her. One night after getting drunk with his companies afterward they go home to see which one of their wife’s is the best/worst and Lucretia husband Collatinus, wins. The Prince, after meeting her, is then overcome with lust and so rapes Lucretia that night. Lucretia is ashamed of what has happened, therefore, she calls for her brother Brutus and husband Collatinus tells them happenings. Lucretia makes the men in the room for promising to avenge her and then commits suicide in front of them with a blade to her chest. Brutus and Collatinus are devastated by grief and then the anger of the loss of Lucretia. So they swear an oath to for full Lucretia dying wish, and they make everyone in the room to swear vengeance as well, because of the loss of Lucretia and indignation she suffers. They spread the word and overthrow the Kingdom, afterward the unity of the people stay and a new era was…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the initial scenes of his play, Shakespeare clearly outlines the distinct conflict of perspectives held by his main protagonists; Antony and Cassius regarding Caesar. Shakespeare’s representation of Antony incorporates that of a humble, loyal and devoted disciple of Caesar; embodied in his vow “When Caesar says, ‘Do this’, it is performed.” Antony’s obedient tone, linked with the concise manner in which he replies to Caesar, captures the utter willingness to serve “Caesar, (his) lord.” In contrast, Shakespeare exhibits Cassius’ bitterness and envy of Caesar as he influences Brutus’ inner confusion to the viewpoint he considers correct. Cassius provides an analogy further encouraging the traitorous desires; “he doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs.” Here Cassius employs a sarcastic tone to aggressively attack Caesar’s authority as a leader, “such a feeble temper should so get the start of…

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Romeo and Juliet

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    But there are a few characters who abuse and use violence excessively, a perfect example is Tybalt. Tybalt seems to enjoys fighting, he “hates the word [peace] as [he] hates hell [and] all Montagues” (1.1. 68). The majority of the violence in the play is caused by Tybalt because in every scene he is present in he tends to overreact and is always the first one with his sword drawn. In act 1 scene 5 at the Capulet party, Tybalt recognizes Romeo 's voice and within ten words is calling for his sword. Tybalt grew up during the feud and was heavily influenced by what he was being told about the Montagues so he assumes that every Montague is the same; the enemy of the Capulets and must be treated like dirt and not human beings. Tybalt’s violence towards the Montagues has grown into a vendetta. Furthermore, when Tybalt is searching for Romeo because he sent him a challenge letter for a duel to the death and he doesn’t care if Romeo answers or not he is going to duel him the next time he sees him. He finally finds Romeo and challenges him but Romeo refuses time and time again, Mercutio ends up fighting on Romeo’s behalf and is killed when Romeo tries to break up the fight. Mercutio was not related to Romeo in any way, he is just Romeo’s…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rape Of Lucrece

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Foremost, Shakespeare sheds light on the male dominance in Roman society once again through Tarquin’s thoughts, specifically: “Perchance his boast of Lucrece’ sovereignty Suggested this proud issue of a king; For by our ears our hearts oft tainted be: Perchance that envy of so rich a thing” (Shakespeare 37-42). The men in Roman society dominate both politically and socially, and for a man to possess or dominate a woman of such beauty would no doubt garner respect and envy from lesser men. In terms of rape, male dominance is very hard on the woman of society, to the point where the women feel more shame in the end for rape than the man, which Julius points out, “Fearful of losing her reputation, and injuring her husband's, she submits to Tarquin's rape. Raped in silence, silenced by her rapist, she later kills herself, thereby retreating into a permanent silence, though only after she has denounced Tarquin to husband and friends” (Julius 14). It is not fair in any way that the victim should fear judgement more than the criminal and by drawing Lucrece’s emotions and her desire to kill herself, Shakespeare attempts to communicate that this element of Roman society lacks justice. It is not just this element of Roman society that is unjust, but the sense of entitlement that men back in the day felt that lead to additional problems ,which is best described in lines 134-138 “Those that much covet are with gain so fond, For what they have not, that which they possess They scatter and unloose it from their bond, And so, by hoping more, they have but less; Or, gaining more, the profit of excess” (Shakesperae 134-138). Tarquin is a wealthy landowner and has anything he could ever want, except Lucrece, and when he could not get her at first he lusted for her even more, eventually driving himself Finto the crime he committed. This…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The gullible Roman citizens in the play believe any leader who speaks. "You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things! / O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome, / Knew you not Pompey?" (1.1.35-37). The Romans switch their loyalties at the drop of a hat, from Pompey to Caesar, to Brutus to Antony. As Cassius puts it, "And why should Caesar be a tyrant then? / Poor man! I know he would not be a wolf, / But that he sees the Romans are but sheep: / He were no lion, were not Romans hinds" (1.3.103-106). He explains that Caesar is only in power because the citizens are so easily swayed and are easy prey, like sheep. They do not question the authenticity of their leader, but follow him without question. This causes conflict to arise between potential leaders and those already in power. Greed and a hunger for power drive tyrants and noblemen alike to do the unthinkable to achieve the position of leadership.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays