Iron's Case Analysis

America, the land of the free and the home of the brave. So much has been sacrificed since the 1700’s to be able to give America that title. Being a junior member of the Justice Department, I have evaluated such cases from Irons and Herman, along with the philosophical readings from Hume, Russell, Arendt, and Cox which date all the way back from the mid-1700’s. With the different perspectives, but ample similarities between them all, we are able to tie in present day events with certain bans and policies implemented today. Iron’s prologue starts off by noting that the Supreme Court has so much power to choose what cases it sees and a majority of cases that have been tried to be reversed, have not been. Iron’s goes on to mention that racial
In America, it is pronounced that everyone has equal rights, so who we are should not matter to a court of law. In these readings, if someone with authority decides that a certain race or religion is faulty in any way, everyone must comply with what they believe to be true, even in the worst case circumstances. Power is used in evil ways and it is seen throughout the cases involving Gordon Hirabayashi, Lloyd Barenblatt, Al- Hussayen, and al-Kidd with violation of their Constitutional rights and within the other philosophical readings. Power is taken for granted by the people who are in authority over it and used against American citizens in cruel ways. The cases were all not made morally correct and even went against Constitutional rights. History can be seen to repeat itself in the ways of evil authority and compliance of
States were disputing over the inconsistency of equal privileges because all states are different sizes and have different interests. The only thing that was wrong in the sovereignty was that it never ended peacefully. The Court had to take everyone’s needs into consideration in order to make it fair. They drew up a new constitution at the Philadelphia convention. The Constitutional Congress had a stronger justification to decide the set of laws because of all they had already accomplished. This can be related to issues in other cases such as Barenblatt’s. HUAC was the stronger party because of the experience they have had. Someone small trying to overcome HUAC did not work out. Small states opinions were not as powerful as the larger states. The Constitution created a powerful government to act on a national level and kept power separated through different branches, checks, and