Preview

Iranian Nuclear Program

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1481 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Iranian Nuclear Program
Iranian Nuclear Program In the recent years, we have seen a big movement in the Middle East that has made headlines all over the world. Whether it be Egypt, Yemen, Tunisia or Libya forcing their leaders out of power in the hopes of a better democracy; to the war currently happening in Syria, the Middle East has had nothing but important and world changing events happening. However, to some, not all of these events might seem so great or safe on a regional and global scale. The current events happening in Iran, such as the nuclear research program, are to some a great threat to the world and nearby Arad countries. Iran has been a big talk in the U.N. on many subjects but I will be focusing on the Nuclear Program that is currently being researched in Iran. There are many different opinions on the subject, but I believe that Iran should be allowed to develop their nuclear program but under strict surveillance from the United Nations, Security Council and the IAEA. Iran is a sovereign state, but it is still a member of the United Nations and is bound to certain treaties or inter-governmental organisations. Also, it has been accused of supporting terrorist group, therefore it is in a great position to state that it will not use it towards supporting terrorists or maybe even using nuclear weapons towards Israel. First of all, ever since 1979, members of the international have accused the Islamic Republic of Iran having been supporting terrorist groups with support, training and ammunition. The Americans are the ones that have accused the most Iran and they state that they have “overwhelming evidence” (McConnell, 2007) and they have described Iran as being an “active state sponsor of terrorism” (unknown, 2012). The Americans released in a report about the 9/11 attacks that stated that 8 to 10 of the hijackers passed through Iran and Iranian border guards facilitated their travel. They also released a report in July 2012, which talked about the state of terrorism in


References: 3. Yoong, S. (2006, August 03). Ahmadinejad: Destroy israel, end crisis. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/03/AR2006080300629.html 4 7. Britannica. (2012). Sovereignty. In Britannica (online ed.). Retrieved from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/557065/sovereignty 8 9. Ahmadinejad, M. (2012, september 24). Interview by Piers Morgan [Video Tape Recording]. President ahmadinejad full 2012 interview with piers morgan , Youtube., Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53ldtzriCMs 10 11. Albright, D., Shire, J., & Paul, B. (2009). Is iran running out of yellowcake?. Retrieved from http://www.isisnucleariran.org/assets/pdf/Iran_Yellowcake.pdf 12
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pf con case
    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pf con case

    Subpoint A – Nuclear proliferation is an action fueled by fear and if there is increase in military force interference, that fear will be legitimized. According to the article “Why Countries Build Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century” by Zachary Keck, “Iran’s nuclear program is better explained, then, by the rise in the potential conventional threat the U.S. poses to the Iran.” As many countries are, Iran was obviously intimidated by the massive military force of the U.S. and made the decision to begin proliferating nuclear weapons. And if the U.S. uses military force as an act to prevent nuclear proliferation, that goal may not be fulfilled.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Patient Diplomacy the Best Approach to Iran’s Nuclear Program?
    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Is Patient Diplomacy the Best Approach to Iran’s Nuclear Program?

    The idea of Iran developing a nuclear weapon has undoubtedly sparked up an international debate on both sides of the isle. While many in the west debate about which actions to take to prevent the development of the bomb or if Iran is even developing the bomb other countries like Russian and China have been reluctant to criticize. From a western perspective we have to decide whether or not a patient diplomacy is the best approach to Iran’s nuclear problem or not. The consequences of attacking Iran could prove to be just as disastrous as not attacking Iran and being threatened by ban attack. In “Taking Side” two scholars on this issue debate this very question. Christopher Hemmer, from “Responding to a Nuclear Iran” and Norman Podhoretz, editor-at-large for the opinion journal “Commentary” argue on both sides of the issue. This is a general overview of the situation, a summary of each authors main points and a conclusion based on my own opinion.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Iran Hostage Crisis
    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Iran Hostage Crisis

    Imagine being held hostage for four hundred and forty four days. The thought alone is scary but this was reality for Fifty-three Americans when they was held hostage at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, Iran. This was a tough situation because America and Iran had bigger problems to deal with. Insurgency broke out and former King Reza Shah Pahlavi was forced into exile by the people of Iran. The United States backed the former King and when Pahlavi came to America looking for refuge this caused a serious situation. The United States learned that Pahlavi had cancer and made a choice to let him in for treatment. This angered the people of Iran and forced Iranian students to protest outside of the American embassy. On November 4th, 1979 the students decided to storm the Embassy creating the four hundred and forty-four day suffering. Pahlavi was forced into exile and the people of Iran welcomed Ayatollah Khomeini, a revolutionist who had been in exile. Although Khomeini did not take part in the overthrow, he indirectly supported the Iran Hostage Crisis with no intent to prevent or stop the crisis. One of the major reasons of the Iran Hostage Crisis was the fact that we were interest in oil.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Counting In Sevens Analysis
    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Counting In Sevens Analysis

    Chief among those issues, for Iran, is its nuclear program. Iranian officials have insisted its aim is peaceful and for energy purposes only, but skeptical U.S., Israeli and other officials accuse Tehran of working to develop nuclear weapons. Iran 's…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Pro nuclear war
    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Pro nuclear war

    “Everyone in the world is threatened by the existence of nuclear weapons. Has anyone the right to wield such destructive power?” (Morality of Nuclear Deterrent) Many people in the United States disagree on whether the United States should keep nuclear weapons. Mainly because of the moral factor. Yes, it is dangerous for countries to own such a powerful figure that threatens millions of people around the world, but the world is trapped by this idea of possible idea of nuclear war that just about every country has on these weapons of mass destruction and will continue to make more to show dominance over the other countries who don’t have as much. The moral factor that is sure to be constantly brought up by many people about keeping our nuclear weapons will always be discussed since the greater damage these weapons cause. For example, when the United Stated bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yes it was tactically right decision and prevented imperialism from expanding, and preventing the cause of japan gaining complete dominance over the world had to be overlooked when coming into the moral play off of the all the people who were affected by this disaster to their country. These cities where quite larger, but not to big so there…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program
    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    Before I go any farther, I want to preface my paper with a disclaimer or two. First, I personally do not believe that Iran, as it currently stands, should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. Iran’s rulers are religious extremists, and they pose a serious threat to the western world. However, I will strive to present an unbiased review of the issue. Secondly, this paper is not meant to be an exhaustive examination of the topic of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. I am a college freshman at the University of Alaska Anchorage, and I wrote this paper for my English 111 class. As such, I had a very limited time period in which I could research Iran and nuclear…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Iran Informative Speech Outline
    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Iran Informative Speech Outline

    Iran’s nuclear program and nuclear weapons have grown exponentially since 2003 threatening Middle-Eastern countries and America. Iran has had a nuclear program since the 1950’s when the U.S. helped launch it as part of the Atoms For Peace program. But since then, the program has grown with out regulation from the I.A.E.A.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why the US should invade Iran
    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why the US should invade Iran

    As some of us know, the topic on whether the United States should enter Iran has been a question our country has been asking itself for some time now. The war has been going on for many years now and many people have had enough of it. This is partially the main reason why our country cannot decide whether or not to invade Iran. After reading a few articles on this topic I have come to realize that by invading Iran, we will help not just the United States, but many other countries as well. We all know how big Iran is into terrorism. After 9/11, I personally would like to invade Iran and shut down everything they have. By invading Iran the United States can shut down some of the big terrorist groups and help our country as well as other countries from future terrorist attacks. By taking out these groups many countries would feel safer and won’t have to worry about being attacked every day. Terrorism is being seen more frequently and it’s something that needs to be stopped. My next point on why the United States should invade Iran is to stop their nuclear programs. Just one nuclear bomb can destroy and small country and wreak destruction and havoc on a larger country. The United States would benefit greatly along with many other countries if we were to invade and eliminate Iran’s nuclear facilities. We can clearly see that Iran doesn’t see eye to eye with the United States. By invading and taking out their strong point (nuclear programs), we could earn much needed respect and possibly end years of history with these countries. I feel that Iran doesn’t know the damage in which they can do with nuclear weapons. The power of these weapons can cause severe damage to any country. By invading Iran, the United States can end things for good and help our country get back on the right path. The next reason why should invade Iran is our economic issue we are facing. As we all know, war is a very costly incident for a…

    • 663 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Debate: Should Iran Have Nuclear Weapons
    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Debate: Should Iran Have Nuclear Weapons

    In order to understand the current situation, one has to first understand why a nuclear weapon in the hands of the Iranian government is so dangerous. In 2006, Ali Khamenei (Iran’s supreme leader), sent military support to Lebanon to fight the Israeli government, the USA’s closest and most trusted ally. This war was caused by the militant Hezbollah group firing rockets at the Israeli border towns as a diversion for an anti-tank missile attack on two armored Israeli Humvees patrolling the border fence. It should also be noted the the United States and many other nations have declared Hezbollah a terrorist organization. According, to a case study done by “The Christian Science Monitor,” Iran has been the world’s leading exporter of terrorism for the past 20+ years[1]. Although this is a already a fairly daunting fact, it’s even more frightening to realize that it is unlikely these ways will change in the future.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    September 11
    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    September 11

    Obama, Barack. "Speech to the Islamic." Voice of Freedom. 3rd ed. Vol. 2. New York,Ny: W.W. Norton &Company,Inc, 2011. 359-62. Print.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    United States Foreign Policy Towards Nuclear Proliferation
    • 4748 Words
    • 19 Pages

    United States Foreign Policy Towards Nuclear Proliferation

    In a joint statement made by President George W. Bush, European Council President Konstandinos Simitis and European Commissioner President Romano Prodi regarding the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) stated:…

    • 4748 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The “Cold War” of the Middle East
    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The “Cold War” of the Middle East

    Netanyahu was quoted in the Weekly Standard saying, “Where's Iran? Iran's completed the first stage. It took them many years, but they completed it and they're 70% of the way there; it is only a few months, possibly a few weeks before they get enough enriched uranium for the first bomb.”…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Should Iran's Nuclear Program?
    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Should Iran's Nuclear Program?

    This fear is not completely irrational; Iran does have a past of supporting terrorist, during 1994-1996 it provided Hamas and the Islamic Jihad with the means to attack Israel (Parsi 11) and in the early 1990’s Iran agreed to provide support for Al Qaeda actions carried out against Israel and the United States (Wilner 21). Wilner explains the fact that Iran has been sponsoring terrorism as an instrument of foreign policy. He explains that Iran does not have the military abilities to influence foreign affairs in other ways, so it attempts to do so by means of terrorism (21-22). This is supported by the fact that when Iran did try to reach out to the Unites States as explained in the previous paragraph; it was simply not taken seriously. Thus when Iran obtains a nuclear weapon the position it will acquire by doing so will be more powerful and Iran will be able to influence foreign affairs without resorting to supporting terrorist groups. Furthermore, a country would never be able to transfer a nuclear weapon without being found out by the United States and face repercussions. Additionally obtaining a nuclear weapon is a very risky and costly process, Iran would not invest in it so extensively and then give it away. But perhaps the biggest reason Iran would defer from providing terrorist groups with nuclear weapons is that Iran cannot predict what those groups would do with those weapons; thus by doing so Iran would end up putting itself at risk, and therefore, as Waltz states: “[Iran] will have every reason to maintain full control over its arsenal”…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Would a World Without Nuclear Weapons Be More or Less Secure?
    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Would a World Without Nuclear Weapons Be More or Less Secure?

    Tepperman, Jonathan. (Aug 28, 2009) “Why Obama should learn to love the Bomb” The Daily Beast.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Negative Speech: India's Role In India?
    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Negative Speech: India's Role In India?

    America is too far and even Israel is not closer than, from the country of Shi’ites, Iran, to whom President Obama is determined to sign with, the nuclear deal to lift all trade sanctions in exchange of abandoning their final trial of making nuclear arsenals. But it looks like a historical bluff. Ofcourse, the first generation centrifuges, which can’t be quickly enriched like a weapon grade material like the later two, will be blocked but Iran can still keep his one third of plutonium enrichment centrifuges at Natanz. Its heavy water facility at Arak and Underground nuclear center at Fordo will not be dismantled but will be kept under inspection, ridiculously by its own inspectors otherwise expect a hassle in allowing the UN Inspectors to make…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics