Preview

Introduction to Private Security

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Introduction to Private Security
Strayer University
SEC 300 Introduction to Private Security
Prof Ebrahim Biparva
October 26, 2011

Elements of Negligent Liability Negligence is the failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do under certain circumstances or taking action which a reasonable person would not (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/negligence). Negligence also assesses the human choice to engage in harmful conduct as proper or improper. This is because choices are deemed improper only if they breach a preexisting obligation to avoid and repair carelessly inflicted harm to others. In some instances, a statute or other law may define specific duties, such as the duty of a person to rescue another. Professionals, such as doctors and lawyers, are also required to uphold a standard of care expected in their profession. When a professional fails to uphold such a standard of care, the professional may be liable for malpractice (doctors are liable for medical malpractice and lawyers are liable for legal malpractice), which is based on the law of negligence.
There are five elements of negligent liability; the first is Duty. This is the obligation of one person to another, this flows from millennia of social customs, philosophy and religion. While serving as the glue to society duty is the thread that binds humans to one another in a community. Duty also constrains and channels behavior in a socially responsible way before the fact, and it provides a basis for judging the propriety of behavior.
The second element is Breach. This is the misconduct itself when the defendant’s improper act or omission which is normally referred to as the defendant’s breach of duty implies the preexistence of a standard of proper behavior to avoid imposing the undue risks of harm to other persons and their property.
The third element is Cause in Fact. This is most often described as the actual connection between a defendant’s negligence and



References: Internet: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/negligence Internet: http://law.hofstra.edu

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Breach of duty is defined as “the violation of a legal or moral obligation; the failure to act as the law obligates one to act; especially a fiduciary’s violation of an obligation owed to another.” Black’s Law Dictionary 214 (9th ed. 2009)…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence in this scenario includes the five essential elements of negligence, duty, breach of duty, the breach being the cause of injury, proximate, and the resulting damages (Lucas, 2008). In a case of negligence the individual or company may be held liable not only with negligence but sometimes with trespass, injury, and even mental or emotional harm (Lucas, 2008). However, the law requires these elements are proven in order to recover in a law suit against a torfeasor for negligence (Melvin,…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Long Island Railroad). Negligence is the legal term given to actions that breach the duty of care that one owes another according to the law. The court considered that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to Helen Palsgraf, and therefore no negligence was committed. The court found that the risk of the harm was unforeseeable. According to The Legal and Ethical Environment of Business, “If the risk of harm is foreseeable, then the duty exists” (2014, pg.224). The court found that the actions which occurred were not only unforeseeable in to the objective observer, but also to Helen Palsgraf. This is to say that the risk was unforeseeable to an objective or reasonably subjective person in her position. The court found that the proximity of the plaintiff to the cause of action was irrelevant. Long Island Railroad actions or inactions caused no negligence to Helen Palsgraf. Even if there was negligence toward someone else, this is not a basis for a claim by Helen…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Legt 1710 Assignment 1

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    * Jones L Introduction to Business Law 1st, 2011, C11 the Tort Law of Negligence. P342…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Omission – An Omission is where the Actus Reus is in the form of not doing something, another term is negligence.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kelly V. Movie Theater

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Movie Theater knew that restroom sink pipe was broken and did not warn Kelly, or any other patron, of the leaky sink pipe in the restroom. Theater did not warn of water in front of the restroom sinks. Their failure to warn Kelly of the dangerous condition was a breach of their duty of due care.…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are different licensing requirements and legal authority that govern private security in each state. These differences govern every aspect of behavior that private security must follow. They include training courses as well as registration. Also discussed in this essay is the legal authority of security guards over the legal authority of public law enforcement officers.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The law looks at two types of causation—actual cause and proximate cause. Often, injury and harm is the result of a chain of events. The person who is the actual cause may or may not be legally responsible. Proximate cause is that act in the natural, direct, uninterrupted sequence of events without which the injury would not have occurred. Proximate cause seeks to decide who, in that chain of events, is responsible for the harm. This can get complicated.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Factual Causation: having been proven in court of causing harm and discomfort to a person or property…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A negligent act is an unintentional but careless act which results in loss. Only a negligent act will be regarded as having breached a duty of care.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A negligent act could be unintentional but careless or intentional that results in abuse or injury. A negligent act is breaching the duty of care. If an individual has evidence that you have been negligent, you are likely to be disciplined. You could lose your job and you could have legal action taken against you. 1.1…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a care worker, we owe a duty of care to the people we support, colleagues, employer and ourselves and the public interest. Every one have a duty of care that we cannot opt out of. Peoples we care support should be treated with respect, involved in decision making about their care and treatment and able influence how the service is run. People should receive safe and appropriate care that meets their needs and support their rights. A negligent act could be unintentional but careless or intentional that results in abuse or injury. A negligent act is breaching the duty of care.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Care Policy

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The four elements necessary to prove a negligence case are duty of care, breach of that duty, injury, and causation. The first requirement in establishing negligence is for a plaintiff to prove the existence of a legal relationship between himself or herself and the defendant. Duty is defined as a legal obligation of care, performance, or observation imposed on one to safeguard the rights of others. This duty, for example, can arise from a relationship between a physician and a patient which may be as simple as a telephone conversation. Duty can also be established by contract or statute between a plaintiff and a defendant.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence Paper

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Negligence as defined by Black’s Law Dictionary (1979) and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO, 2002) is the “failure to use such care as a reasonably prudent and careful person would use under similar circumstances.” It is the predominant theory of liability in medical malpractice litigation (King, 1986) (Weld. Garmon. Bibb. 2009.).” During…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    2. Negligence is the failure of an ordinary, reasonable, and prudent person to exercise due care, resulting in harm or injury to the plaintiff. Negligence torts do not require intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the level necessary to protect others against unreasonable risks of harm. To determine if someone should be found liable for a negligence tort, a reasonable person standard is used. If the defendant 's behavior is found to be less careful than behavior a reasonable person would exhibit, that defendant can be found liable for damages.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics