Preview

Interpreting the Perfect Electoral System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2195 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Interpreting the Perfect Electoral System
'There is no such thing as a perfect electoral system'

The idea of perfection is interpreted differently amongst everybody in the UK. The word 'Perfect' is defined as having all the necessary or typical characteristics required for a given situation. So everybody will have different thoughts on what really is a perfect electoral system. Generally, a perfect electoral system is one which has the qualities of being simple, gives a varied choice to the electorate, is fair and proportional, gives a clear outcome and is microcosmic, it represents the people more.
Firstly, it could be argued that the more proportional electoral systems are the closest to a 'perfect' electoral system because they show what/who the people of the UK really voted for. One proportional system is the Single Transferrable Vote. This system operates by representatives being elected in large multi-member constituencies, the voting is preferential and also known as 'Voting Ordinal' where the voters can vote as many times as they want. The candidates much receive a quota known as a droop quota to actually become elected and if they reach this quota any excess votes are redistributed on the basis of 2nd preferences. The calculation used to work out the quota is (total valid poll/(seats+1))+1, which some people argue is too complicated for any elections in the UK, if no candidate reaches the quota then the lowest places candidate is eliminated and the second preferences of the people that voted for them are redistributed. This system is used successfully in many UK elections, it's used in Northern Ireland for elections such as in the Assembly, for local government elections and EU parliament elections. The Republic of Ireland and Scotland both use it for Local Elections.
However there are both many advantages and disadvantages of using this electoral system. Firstly it delivers proportional outcomes and it also ensures that votes are largely of equal values. In addition, the threshold is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    An interesting point to this discussion is that many of the “pros” are argued by some to be disadvantages, and many of the “cons” are believed to be the advantages of the system by others. It could be said that the Electoral College was created for a different time in this country, but by some degree of fortune and foresight it is one of the staples of our government today.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1850 Britain was extremely far from being known as a democracy. This was due to the fact that the great reform act only extended the power of the vote from wealthy landowning men in 1832 to the wealthy middle class men. This meant that the majority of the population still were unable to vote. For a country to be democratic it entails to have certain circumstances which would include the majority of the population, every adult, having the right to vote for their country. There should also be an equal amount of seats distributed. All elections that take place should be run fairly and be restricted from intimidation and influence. Every adult should also only be entitled to one vote whereas at this time some individuals who went to university could vote in their university constituency as well as when they owned a property. It should be allowed that a person from any background is able to become an MP. By 1918 many of these circumstances had been met although not all. Although improvements had been met in Britain some aspects that would make the country fully become a democracy where not in place, therefore it can be argued that Britain was not fully a democracy by 1918.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fttp Pros And Cons

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Over the course of history since the America revolution the united states has adopted a system of voting called FTTP (Or first past the post). it is a winner takes all system with the primary goal of winning the most electoral votes. In the United States the system generalizes politics into two major parties Republican and democratic. if the united states were to adopt a proportional representation system it would benefit the country by giving a more accurate representation of voter demographic, limiting the pressure to gerrymander political boundaries. And provide an environment where third party independent candidates are not pressured by the conventional two party system.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given the votes that my MP and his competitors received, and the percentage of votes and seats that the national parties received, Canada’s electoral system is unfair and should be reformed. The electoral system is disproportionate, and with less than 50% of the vote, a given party could easily earn a majority of the seats. In turn, all the other parties are underrepresented. Another reason Canada’s electoral system should be reformed is because votes are seen as being wasted. Lastly, voters are misrepresented in the House of Commons.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Electoral College is a system created by our founding fathers when they created the Constitution. Within this process, the selection of electors hold a meeting where they vote for the President and Vice President, as well as, the counting of electoral votes by Congress. Each state is entitled an allowance of electors which is based off the number of members in its Congressional delegation. The total number of electors within the Electoral College is 538 electors, but in turn there is only 270 votes needed in order to elect the President.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The big problems of the electoral system were particularly evident in the 2000 elections: There may have been significant discrepancies between the voter decision and the electoral vote; a candidate who obtains the most vote’s nationwide, does not necessarily have to combine the most electors. Al Gore won in 2000, the absolute majority of votes, but received fewer votes in the Electoral College as his opponent George W. Bush. Another disadvantage is the focus of the candidates on states where pollsters cannot predict a clear decision (in particular, the traditional Swing States). The other states get little attention during the election campaign, often sequentially resulting in below average turnouts. The same is shared in the coastal states…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason why the first past the post system suits Britain is that it is a simple and easily understood system. Compared to systems like the alternative vote and additional member system it is far less complex. This encourages turnout as it is simply ticking a box. This encourages those who find politics and the systems surrounding it confusing to vote. Not only is it important to receive everybody’s vote but everyone is confident and sure they have voted correctly.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there are some that would say that the electoral college is what keeps our country the way it is and promotes good government(Document C). In order to truly maintain the idea that everyone is equal especially in voting the electoral college should be…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This system makes it more fair for states that do not feel as important. Citizens are more likely to vote, thus improving the results and chances of a candidate winning. This grants the less populated states to feel as though their votes are just as important as the more populated ones. Also, it is a much more accurate and organized way to count votes. The Electoral College reduces the chance of miscounts and revotes.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of reasons I believe the Electoral College isn’t a good system is because, depending on what state you live in, your vote is worth more. For instance, if you live in Wyoming, which has 3 electors and a small population, your vote is worth more. A single elector’s vote…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is important to consider the development of a new system of national elections and the issues that would result. Implementing the direct election would lead to “a host of defects that would make electoral misfires more likely and trigger a series of political and constitutional crises” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). This would be a source of instability moving forward as these changes would require changes to the current system and would need to have the agreements among several states in a subconstitutional or binding form or an amendment to the Constitution ratified by two thirds of the states. The new proposed system “risks creating a presidential election system that is neither workable nor fair” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). While it is argued that the direct election would promote fairness and representation, it would likely be the case that these factors would be reduced in this scenario. It is therefore essential to develop a coherent framework for implementing such a strategy. (Implementing direct…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    electoral college

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ELECTORAL COLLEGE : The reason why we use the electoral college in the U.S. is to decide who is going to be the next president. The presidency is not always won by popular vote. The founding fathers opted for an electoral college , because they wanted the president to be chosen by those who were well informed ,and qualified enough to have the ability to chose a president. The main argument against the electoral college is that the presidency should be won by popular vote alone. It shouldn’t be that one candidate could win the popular vote, and still lose the election. One of the pros of the electoral college is that the system persuades candidates to promote themselves in small and big cities of the battle states. Another pro of the system is if a recount was needed it could often be centered to the specific state (s) . For example in 2000 a recount was proposed in the state of Florida between Al gore and George w. Bush, if not for the electoral college the recount may have had to take place in the nation. One of the cons of the electoral college is that it has a major possibility of not representing the popular opinion , by that I mean the voting system has the hazard of a “faithless” elector a person who is pledged to vote for a specific party s candidate but votes for an other . The electoral college has preformed its function for over 200 years by ensuring that the president of the U.S. has both sufficient poplar support to govern and his support is sufficiently distributed throughout the country to enable him to govern effectively. The fact that the electoral college was originally designed to solve one set of problems but today serves to solve an entirely different set of problems is a tribute to the genius of the Founding Fathers .…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Electoral College has been successful in that it has picked many presidents over hundreds of years. Over the years their has been failures in which there has been tied Electoral College votes and the popular vote choosing a different president than the Electoral College. The Electoral College has failed to properly represent its people in the popular vote in five elections. The most recent ones have been in the 21st century occurring in 2000 and 2016. The 2000 vote was that George Bush had lost the popular vote, but won the Electoral Vote. The same thing had happened to Donald Trump this year. The two ties in history were in 1800 and 1824. These elections were forced to be brought upon the House of Representatives and voted there. Each state got one vote and the president was decided on who had more states voting for…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This system was developed for two main reasons, the first was to create a buffer between population and the election of a president, and the second was to give extra power to smaller states. The founders didn’t trust the population to make the correct choice in a direct election. This being the reason we have electors, which are men or women believed to insure only a qualified person can take office.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In America, every four years there is a presidential election that gives Americans the right to vote. The United States is a role model to other countries of the concept of giving all citizens equal share in the government and the way it is run. The Electoral College ruins the voting and creates an unfair system that is not equal. It destroys the fundamental part of democracy that gives everyone the right to vote. The Electoral College raises the question "Is the United States a republic?". With the Electoral College, it is a winner take all system which makes some votes practically useless. The founding fathers believed that most people were uneducated and would make uninformed decisions and the way news travel has changed. With this system,…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays